Crafting research communication in building history

Interactive article

Forfattere

  • Gunnar Almevik University of Gothenburg, Department of Conservation
  • Jonathan Westin University of Gothenburg, Centre for Digital Humanities

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4404

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

Virtual reality, non-traditional research output (NTRO), virtual diorama, Hemse stave church

Sammendrag

This research is presented through an interactive application. A virtual reconstruction based on the remains from a medieval stave church is used as a case study to re-establish the historic building as a tangible place and assemblage. Augmented by virtual reality, the research focuses on the sensuous aspects of the stave church as a whole—where architecture, artefacts, light, and materials interact—through the movements of approaching, entering, and dwelling. The research output is a virtual reconstruction, or a virtual diorama, that “re-members” the stave church elements and re-contextualises contemporaneous religious artefacts that have been dismembered and diffused in various exhibitions and deposits. The contribution in this research is methodological, seeking to test and provide a case to discuss how non-traditional research outcome can be crafted to elicit the sensuous aspects of research and still attend to the rigor of science. We seek to methodologise the digital artefact as a research output but also as a means for testing hypothesis and observing the effects when enacting the environment. The connection to the craft sciences concerns both the empirical material, the wooden stave church as a crafted object, and the exploration of an interactive application as a research output or hermeneutic device in the research process. 

Forfatterbiografier

Gunnar Almevik, University of Gothenburg, Department of Conservation

PhD, Professor

Jonathan Westin, University of Gothenburg, Centre for Digital Humanities

PhD, Research Coordinator

Referanser

Almevik, G. & Westin, J. (2020). Entering Hemse. Enacting the Assemblage of a 12th-Century Gotlandic Stave Church. In G. Tagesson, P. Cornell, M. Gardiner, L. Tomas & K. Weikert (Ed.), For My Descendants and Myself, a Nice and Pleasant Abode’ – Agency, Micro-history and Built Environment (pp. 13-28). Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddckrm.5

Almevik, G., Pärmsten, B. & Sjöholm, M. (2020). Mellan Hemse och Mästermyr. META Historisk arkeologisk tidskrift. (1), 31-54.

Almevik, G. (2019). Historiskt laboratorium. Digitala modeller och rekonstruktioner av medeltida kyrkorum. In Kungliga Vitterhetsakademiens årsbok 2019 (pp. 139-156). Kungl. Vitterhetsakademien.

Almevik, G. (2017). Perusing space-time in medieval sacred architecture: Paths, bundles, and constraints in Endre church during a fifteenth-century mass. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 99(3), 360–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2017.1408027

Almevik, G. & Westin, J. (2017). Hemse stave church revisited. Lund Archaeological Review, 23, 7–26. https://journals.lub.lu.se/lar/article/view/21645

Bailey, J.O., Bailenson, J.N. & Casasanto, D. (2016). When does virtual embodiment change our minds? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00263

Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics of Cognitive Science, 2(4), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x

Gibson, J. (2015). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press. (Original work published 1979)

Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford University Press.

Harris, O.J.T. & Cipolla, C.N. (2017). Archaeological Theory in the New Millennium: Introducing Current Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713250

Hägerstrand, T. (2009). Tillvaroväven. Forskningsrådet Formas.

Ingold, T. (2002). The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466025

Kolb, D. (2006). Real Places in Virtual Spaces. Nordic Journal of Architectural research, 19(3), 69–77.

Kus, S., (1992). Towards an archaeology of body and soul. In C. Gardin & C. Peebles (eds), Representations in Archaeology (pp. 168–77). Indiana University Press.

Landzelius, M. (1999). Dis[re]membering Spaces: Swedish Modernism in Law Courts Controversy. [Doctoral Diss.] Department of Conservation, Gothenburg Univ.

De Rue, J., G. Plets, G. Verhoeven, P. De Smedt, M. Bats, B. Cherretté, W. De Maeyer, J. Deconynck, D. Herremans, P. Laloo, M. Van Meirvenne & W. De Clercq (2013). Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40(2), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040

Ryle, G. (1945–1946.) Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 46, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/46.1.1

Tarlow, S. (2000). Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 41(5), 713–46. https://doi.org/10.1086/317404

Varela, F., E. Thompson & E. Rosch (1992). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001

Westin, J. & Almevik, G. (2017). A virtual diorama: Mapping archives in situ at places of cultural significance. Nordisk Museologi, (2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.5617/nm.6343

Westin, J. (2014). Inking a past: Visualization as a shedding of uncertainty. Visual Anthropology Review, 30(2),139–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12044

Zopf, R., Polito, V. & Moore, J. (2017). Revisiting the link between body and agency: Visual movement congruency enhances intentional binding but is not body-specific. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18492-7

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2021-05-10

Hvordan referere

Almevik, G., & Westin, J. . (2021). Crafting research communication in building history: Interactive article. FormAkademisk - Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4404

Cited by