Narrativ strategi : Nettundervisning i kunst og håndverk

Ellen Kathrine Baskår

doi:10.7577/formakademisk.3545

Authors

Ellen Kathrine Baskår University of Southeast Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3545

Keywords:

teacher education, arts and crafts, online teaching, narrative strategy

Abstract

The subject of arts and crafts in teacher education, when taught online in real time and not face-to-face, has different prerequisites for the creation of motivation, engagement and participation in student groups. The form of instruction also needs to be different from that used in traditional classroom teaching to create and maintain good communication with the students and follow up on their academic work and learning. This article presents a study that used pedagogical action research as a method to examine teaching in two different student groups. Specifically, a narrative strategy was used. A narrative strategy, in this context, is an appropriate use of narrative in order to improve the subject-didactic arrangement in and around online education. I started the academic year by presenting the students with various challenges and possible solutions related to my own artistic development work with the aim of developing a common platform as a starting point for motivation for, participation in and communication about creative work. Observations of the different phases of the teaching process showed that the students developed their academic communication skills and their understanding of how learning relates to creative work. I find reason to link these positive experiences to the application of narrative strategy and discuss this strategy in relation to Bruner’s and Bandura’s theories of discovery learning and modelling.

Author Biography

Ellen Kathrine Baskår, University of Southeast Norway

Department of Visual and Performing Arts Education

Associate professor in Arts and Crafts

References

Aukrust, V. (1997). Introduksjon til Utdanningskultur og læring. In J. Bruner (Ed.), Utdanningskultur og læring [Educational culture and learning].Ad Notam Gyldendal.

Austring, B.D & Sørensen, M. (2006). Æstetik og Læring. Grundbog om æstetiske læreprocesser [Aesthetics and Learning. Basic book on aesthetic learning processes]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.

Austring, B.D & Sørensen, M. (2019). Æstetiske læreprocesser i skolen [Aesthetic learning processes in school]. In (Eds.) K. H. Karlsen & G. B. Bjørnstad (red.), Skaperglede, engasjement og utforskertrang. Nye perspektiver på estetiske & tverrfaglige undervisningsmetoder i pedagogisk virksomhet [Creative joy, commitment and a desire to explore. New perspectives on aesthetic & interdisciplinary teaching methods in educational activities](ss. 259-277). Universitetsforlaget.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In: M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1962 (pp. 211–274). University of Nebraska Press.

Baskår, E. (2006). Når det tekstile møter det digitale. Undersøkelser gjennom eget og studenters skapende arbeid [When textile meets digital. Investigations through own and students' creative work](Masteroppgave). Høgskolen i Telemark, Notodden.

Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. (1970). Om å lære [About learning].Dreyers forlag.

Bruner, J. (1997): Utdanningskultur og læring [Educational culture and learning]. Ad Notam Gyldendal.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press.

Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Educational Knowledge and Action Research. Falmer Press.

Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Macmillan.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The Design and Evaluation of School Programs, On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd. ed.). Macmillan.

Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Open University Press.

Engh, R., Dobson, S. & Høihilder, E. K. (2007). Vurdering for læring [Assessment for learning]. Høyskoleforlaget.

Fossland, T. (2015). Digitale læringsformer i høyere utdanning [Digital forms of learning in higher education]. Universitetsforlaget.

Fossland, T. & Ramberg, K. R. (2016). Kvalitetskjeden i høyere utdanning – en guide for digital kompetanse og undervisningskvalitet [The quality chain in higher education – a guide for digital competence and teaching quality]. (Norgesuniversitetets skriftserie 1/2016). Norgesuniversitetet. https://diku.no/content/download/1136/file/1-2016-guide-for-digital-kompetanse-og.pdf

Groth, C. (2017). Making sense through hands. Design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition [Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University, Helsinki]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-60-7130-5

Gulliksen, M. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Routledge

Hiim, H. (2010). Pedagogisk aksjonsforskning. Eksempler, prinsipper og kunnskapsfilosofisk grunnlag. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Hiim, H. (2013). Praksisbasert yrkesutdanning. Hvordan utvikle relevant yrkesutdanning for elever og arbeidsliv? [Practice-based vocational education. How to develop relevant vocational education for students and working life?]. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds) Handbook of Action Research. (pp. 91–102). Sage.

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2010a). Nasjonale retningslinjer for grunnskolelærerutdanningen 1.-7.trinn. [National guidelines for primary school teacher training grades 1-7].

https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/rundskriv/2010/retningslinjer_grunnskolelaererutdanningen_1_7_trinn.pdf

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2010b). Nasjonale retningslinjer for grunnskolelærerutdanningen 5.-10. trinn. [National guidelines for primary school teacher training grades 5-10]. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/rundskriv/2010/retningslinjer_grunnskolelaererutdanningen_5_10_trinn.pdf

Kunnskapsdepartementet (2019) Læreplan i kunst og håndverk (KHV01-02) Fastsatt som forskrift. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet 2020. [Curriculum in art and crafts (KHV01-02) Established as a regulation. The Curriculum Agency for the Knowledge Promotion 2020]. https://www.udir.no/lk20/khv01-02?lang=nob

Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2017). Overordnet del – verdier og prinsipper for grunnopplæringen. [Core curriculum – values and principles forprimary and secondary education]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/verdier-og-prinsipper-for grunnopplaringen/id2570003/

Kähler, C. F. (2012). Det kompetente selv: en introduktion til Albert Banduras teori om selvkompetence og kontrol. [The competent self: an introduction to Albert Bandura's theory of self-competence and control]. Frydenlund.

Lerdahl, E. (2007). Slagkraft: Håndbok i idèutvikling [Impact: Handbook in idea development]. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Meld. St. 16 (2016-2017). Kultur for kvalitet i høyere utdanning [Quality Culture in Higher Education]. Kunnskapsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-16-20162017/id2536007/.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). Kroppens fenomenologi [The Phenomenology of Perception]. Pax.

Molander, A. & Smeby, J.-C. (Eds.). (2013). Profesjonsstudier II. [Professional studies II]. Universitetsforlaget.

Postholm, M.B. & Moen, T. (2018). Forsknings- og utviklingsarbeid i skolen. En metodebok for lærere, studenter og forskere [Research and development work in school. A method book for teachers, students and researchers](2nd ed.) Universitetsforlaget.

Riis, K. (2016). Designkundskabens DNA: Udforskning af designkundskab gennem designprocessen Mit DNA [The DNA of Design Knowledge](Doctoral dissertation, Det humanistiske fakultet, Institutt for filosofi og religionsvitenskap, NTNU, Trondheim). http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2393093

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Guilford.

Universitetet i Oslo. (2014). Ramnebryllup i kråkelund. [Raven wedding in crow grove] [Dokumentasjonsprosjektet]. https://www.dokpro.uio.no/ballader/tekster_html/f/f068_003.html

Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2016). Kunst og håndverk – fagets egenart [Art and crafts – the specialty of the subject.]. https://www.udir.no/laring-ogtrivsel/lareplanverket/fag/kunst-og-handverk/kunst-og-handverk---fagets-egenart/

Vedeler, L. (2000). Observasjonsforskning i pedagogiske fag; en innføring i bruk av metoder [Observational research in educational subjects; an introduction to the use of methods]. Gyldendal Akademisk.

Whitehead, J. & McNiff, J. (2006). Action research: living theory. Sage.

Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 61(1-2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671