Pictures on Walls – how Visual Manifestations define Muslim Spaces in Norwegian Homes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3916Keywords:
visual and religious identity, secular-religious, organization, diasporaAbstract
The aim of this article is to investigate how Norwegian Muslim families cope with dilemmas created by contradictory traditions, such as Islamic and Western traditions, and to explore how they construct their visual and religious identity living in diaspora. The article is based on research that includes interviews with twenty young informants. The informants explain that they and their families classify pictures into two main categories: Religious calligraphic pictures are treated according to customs and rituals in the home. When it comes to figurative pictures with secular focus, the situation is different. Some figurative pictures, especially photographic portraits, generate conflicts in the families. There are different points of views regarding such pictures in Islam. The photographic portrait is often perceived as an agent in its own right, it is considered to inspire the beholder’s imagination and to have a disturbing influence if situated in places of prayer. Many pray at home, and some organization of the homely space is required.
References
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2003). The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam. Elfarouq Foundation. (Opprinnelig utgitt 1960)
Bal, M. (2003). Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture. Journal of Visual Culture 2(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/147041290300200101 https://doi.org/10.1177/147041290300200101
Bourdieu, P. (1995). Distinksjonen. En sosiologisk kritikk av dømmekraften. Pax.
Brekketo, B. (2013). Taswir i norsk kontekst. En undersøkelse av hvordan unge norskpakistanske muslimer forholder seg til visuell kommunikasjon med figurative uttrykk. (Doktoravhandling). Universitetet i Bergen.
Brekketo, B. (2014). Taswir – perspektiver frå en meningsutveksling om figurativ fremstilling i sunni-islam. FormAkademisk – Forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk, 7(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.899 https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.899
Didi-Huberman, G. (2005). Confronting Images: Questioning the Ends of a Certain History of Art. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Elkins, J. (2007). Art History as a Global Discipline. I J. Elkins (Ed.), Is Art History Global? (pp. 3-24). Routledge.
Freedberg, D. (1989). The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226259031.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226259031.001.0001
Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press.
Giddens, A. (1997). Modernitet og selvidentitet. Selvet og samfundet under senmoderniteten. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Grabar, O. (2005). Early Islamic Art, 650-1100: Constructing the Study of Islamic Art. Ashgate Publishing Company.
Grabar, O. (2006). Islamic Art and Beyond. Ashgate Publishing Company.
Gruber, C. (2009). Between Logos (Kalima) and Light (Nür): Representations of the Prophet Muhammad in Islamic Painting. Muqarnas: An Annual on the Visual Cultures of the Islamic World, 26(1), 229-263. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993_02601011 https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993_02601011
Jacobsen, C. M. (2006). Staying on the Straight Path: Religious Identities and Practices among Young Muslims in Norway. (Doktoravhandling). Universitetet i Bergen.
Kesner, L. (2007). Is a Truly Global History Possible? I J. Elkins (Ed.), Is Art History Global? (pp. 81-112). Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1986). Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Opprinnelig publisert 1962)
Mirza, Y. (2005). Abraham as an Iconoclast: Understanding the Destruction of ‘Images’ through Qur’anic Exegesis. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 16(4), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410500250222 https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410500250222
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2003). The Obscure Object of Visual Culture. Responses to Mieke Bal’s ‘Visual Essentialism and the Object of Visual Culture’. Journal of Visual Culture 2(2), 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129030022010 https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129030022010
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2008 [1995]). What is Visual Culture? In J. Morra & M. Smith (Eds.), What is Visual Culture Studies? (bind 1, pp. 298-312). Routledge.
Morgan, D. 2005. The Sacred Gaze: Religious Visual Culture in Theory and Practice. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938304 https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938304
Moxey, K. (2008). Visual Studies and the Iconic Turn. Journal of Visual Culture 7(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412908091934 https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412908091934
Naguib, S.-A. (2002). The Northern Way: Muslim Communities in Norway. I Y. Y. Haddad & J. I. Smith (Eds.), Muslim Minorities in the West: Visible and Invisible (pp. 161-175). Altamira Press.
Østberg, S. (2003). Muslim i Norge. Universitetsforlaget.
Qureshi, R. B. (1996). Transcending Space: Recitation and Community among South Asian Muslims in Canada. I B. D. Metcalf (Ed.), Making Muslim Space in North America and Europe (pp. 46-65). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917439-006 https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917439-006
Ramadan, T. (2004 [1999]). At være europæisk muslim: Islamske kilder i en europæisk sammenheng. Forlaget Hovedland.
Rogan, B. & Naguib S.-A. (2011). Materiell kultur og forskning på tvers. En introduksjon. I S.-A. Naguib & B. Rogan (Red.), Materiell kultur & kulturens materialitet (ss. 9-19). Novus Forlag.
Rolness, K. (1995). Med smak skal hjemmet bygges. Aschehoug.
Shakir, A. M. A.-R. (1998). The Islamic Ruling Concerning At-Tasweer. Zakee Muwwakkil’s Books & Articles.
Thorbjørnsrud, B. (2004). Motstand mot slør/motstand med slør. I N. Høstmælingen (Red.), Hijab i Norge (ss. 36-52). Abstrakt forlag.
Vogt, K. (2004). Historien om et hodeplagg. I N. Høstmælingen (Red.), Hijab i Norge (ss. 23-36). Abstrakt forlag.
Ziehe, T. (1989). Kulturanalyser. Ungdom, utbildning, modernitet. Symposion Forlag.
Aase, T. H. (1997). Tolkning av kategorier. Observasjon, begrep og kategori. I E. Fossåskaret, O. L. Fuglestad & T. H. Aase (Reds.), Metodisk feltarbeid: Produksjon og tolkning av kvalitative data (ss. 143-167). Universitetsforlaget.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Birte Brekketo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.