Keywords:Housing First, Scaling-up, Social Innovation, Homelessness, Institutional Change, Drivers and Barriers
There has been an increased interest in Housing First services in Sweden over the past few years. The model was first developed in New York by the organization Pathways to Housing. The growing interest in Housing First as a response to ending long-term homelessness is seen not only in the US and Canada, but also in Europe. One reason for this is the mass of evidence showing high housing retention rates with Housing First services as compared with traditional services. This article aims to analyse the drivers and barriers that hinder or facilitate the scaling up of Housing First pilots. The research question is: Is it possible to incorporate lessons learned from the Housing First pilot into the existing system of homelessness services? In other words: Is it possible to put new wine into old bottles?
This is an ongoing research project on Housing First services in Sweden, with the specific focus on the Housing First pilot in the city of Helsingborg. The empirical material consists of in-depth interviews and focus group interviews with project managers, support workers and other stakeholders. The main results show that leadership is essential and a key driver for the scaling-up process. Another driver is the importance of repeating the vision and goals of the idea to keep the story alive. A third key driver is that the staff has identified the Housing First approach as a relative advantage and believes in the idea. The main barrier to the scaling-up process lies in the structures that maintain and surround the social housing programme.
Arnold, K. R. (2004). Homelessness, citizenship, and identity: The uncanniness of late modernity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Barnett, J., Vasileiou, K., Djemil, F., Brooks, L., & Young, T. (2011). Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 342–342. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-342
Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016a). Social innovation: A sympathetic and critical interpretation. In: T. Brandsen, A. Evers, S. Cattacin, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8_1
Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. Brandsen, (2016b). The good, the bad and the ugly in social innovation. In: T. Brandsen, A. Evers, S. Cattacin, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social Innovations in the urban context. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8_25
Clarke, S., & Stevens, E. (2008). Sustainable leadership in small rural schools: Selected Australian vignettes. Journal of Educational Change 10(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9076-8
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. C. (1998). Home, home ownership, and the search for ontological security. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.00088
Essén, A., & Lindblad, S. (2013). Innovation as emergence in healthcare: Unpacking change from within. Social Science & Medicine, 93, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.035
Felton, B. J. (2003). Innovation and implementation in mental health services for homeless adults: A case study. Community Mental Health Journal, 39(4), 309–322.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Godin, B. (2012). Social innovation: Utopias of innovation from c.1830 to the present. Project on the intellectual history of innovation. Working Paper No. 11. Retrieved from http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/SocialInnovation_2012.pdf
Greenhalgh, T., Macfarlane F., Barton‐Sweeney, C., & Woodard, F. (2012). If we build it, will it stay? A case study of the sustainability of whole-system change in London. Milbank Quarterly, 90(3), 516–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00673.x
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008) Institutional entrepreneurship. In: R. Greenwood (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n8
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present, Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Iriss (2016). Innovation and improvement. Retrieved from http://www.iriss.org.uk/about/innovation
Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Riverhead Books.
Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe: Some reflections on processes at stake and actors involved. In: Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315244433-1
Klein, J-L. (2013). Introduction: Social innovation at the crossroads between science, economy and society. In: F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809993
Knutagård, M. (2009). Skälens fångar. Hemlöshetsarbetets organisering, kategoriseringar och förklaringar. [Prisoners of reasons: organization, categorizations and explanations of work with the homeless]. Dissertation. Malmö: Égalité.
Knutagård, M. (2015). Bostad först som strategi eller strategisk strimma [Housing First as Strategy or Strategic Streak], Alkohol & Narkotika (4), 12–15.
Knutagård, M., & Kristiansen, K. (2013). Not by the Book: The Emergence and Translation of Housing First in Sweden. European Journal of Homelessness, 7(1), 93–115.
Knutagård, M. & Kristiansen, K. (2016). Scaling Up Housing First Pilots – Drivers and Barriers. Paper presented at the Third ISA Forum of Sociology, The Futures We Want: Global Sociology and the Struggles for a Better World, Vienna, Austria, July 10–14, 2016.
Kristiansen, A. (2013). Utvärdering av Bostad först-projektet i Helsingborg. Slutrapport. [Evaluation of the Housing First project in Helsingborg. Final report]. Helsingborg: Socialförvaltningen, Helsingborgs stad.
Kristiansen, A., & Espmarker, A. (2012). Sen är det ju mycket det här att man får vara ärlig också och det är man ju inte van vid... Bostad först ur de boendes perspektiv. [Then it is a lot of this that you can be honest too, and you are not used to that ... Housing first from the perspective of the residents]. Lund: Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet, Working paper serien 2012:4. https://doi.org/10.2307/40144653
Lind, H., & Lundström, S. (2007). Bostäder på marknadens villkor [Housing on the conditions of the market]. Stockholm: SNS.
Lindbom, A. (2001). Dismantling Swedish housing policy, Governance, 14(4), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00171
Martinelli, F. (2012). Social innovation or social exclusion? Innovating social services in the context of a retrenching welfare state. In: H. W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_11
Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2015.01.10
Milat, A. J., King, L., Bauman, A. E., & Redman, S. (2012). The concept of scalability: Increasing the scale and potential adoption of health promotion interventions into policy and practice. Health Promotion International, 28(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar097
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: Intuition, precept, concept, theory and practice. In: F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809993.00011
NBHW (2017). Hemlöshet 2017: omfattning och karaktär. [Homelessness 2017: Extent and Character]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.
Padgett, D. K. (2007) There’s no place like (a) home: Ontological security among persons with serious mental illness in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1925–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.011
Padgett, D. K., Henwood, B., & Tsemberis, S. (2016). Housing first: Ending homelessness, transforming systems, and changing lives. New York: Oxford Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199989805.001.0001
Pleace, N. (2016). Housing First Guide Europe. Retrieved from http://housingfirstguide.eu/website/
Pleace, N., Culhane, D., Granfelt, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). The Finnish Homelessness Strategy – An International Review. REPORTS OF THE MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT 3en | 2015.
Radley, A., Hodgetts, D., & Cullen, A. (2005). Visualizing homelessness: A study in photography and estrangement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.825
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Rønning, R., Knutagård, M., Heule, C. & Swärd, H. (2013). Innovationer i välfärden - möjligheter och begränsningar. [Innovations in welfare - possibilities and limitations]. Stockholm: Liber.
Rønning, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). Innovation in Social Welfare and Human Services. New York: Routledge.
Sahlin, I. (2005). The staircase of transition. Survival through failure. Innovation, 18(2), 115–135.
Sahlin, I. (2015). Searching for a homeless strategy in Sweden. European Journal of Homelessness, 9(2), 161–186.
Salveron, M., Arney, F., & Scott, D. (2006). Sowing the seeds of innovation: Ideas for child and family services. Family Matters, 73, 38–45.
Sievanen, L., Leslie, H. M., Wondolleck, J. M., Yaffee, S. L., McLeod, K. L., & Campbell, L. M. (2011). Linking top-down and bottom-up processes through the new U.S. National Ocean Policy. Conservation Letters, 4(4), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00178.x
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In: W. Streeck, & K. A. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287070170020602
Talukder, M., & A. Quazi (2011). The impact of social influence on individuals’ adoption of innovation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 21(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2011.564483
Tsemberis, S. (2015) Housing First: The pathways model to end homelessness for people with mental health and substance use disorders. Revised and updated for the DSM-5 edition. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
What Works Scotland Evidence Review (2015). Scaling-up innovations. Retrieved from http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/WWS-EB-evidence-review-Scaling-Up-Innovations-June-2015.pdf https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229488-2-en
Wibeck, V. (2010). Fokusgrupper: om fokuserade gruppintervjuer som undersökningsmetod. [Focus groups: on focused group interviews as a research method] 2., uppdaterade och utök. uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Mook, C. (2005). The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: Creating the conditions for youth–adult partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20044
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).