https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/issue/feed 2025-03-28T09:05:34+01:00 Albertina Rusandu albertina.rusandu@ntnu.no Open Journal Systems <p><strong><em>Radiography Open</em></strong> is an open access scientific journal that publishes scientific original articles, review articles, and case studies, within a broad understanding of radiography. In addition, <strong><em>Radiography Open</em></strong> publishes columns that underpin evidence-based practice within radiography.</p> https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/6179 2025-02-12T10:59:26+01:00 Malene Roland Vils Pedersen malene12@mail.tele.dk Sheldon Bailey Sheldon.Bailey@rdpolytech.ca Randi Johansen Reidunsdatter randi.j.reidunsdatter@ntnu.no

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p>Continuing Medical Education (CME) papers is a method for healthcare professionals to gain new knowledge, learn new technologies and procedures and keep up with advances in their respective fields. Healthcare professionals have a lifelong responsibility to learn throughout their professional career.<br />CME papers generally outline a specific case, topic, or challenge in the medical field. They often conclude with an individual assessment, such as a 10-question multiple-choice exam, to test the learners understanding of the material.<br />Unfortunately, radiographers, nurses and other medical healthcare professionals working in the Nordic countries do not have abundant access to Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programs, which are designed to help professionals to engage and enhance skills, knowledge and abilities. Even without formal CPD programs, radiographers must stay updated to maintain high professional standards. Nordic healthcare professionals can still benefit from reading and writing CME papers and participate in CME assessments.<br />CPD are widely used in many other European countries such as UK and Ireland. Therefore, CME papers can be a way to facilitate new qualifications or knowledge.</p>

2025-03-28T00:00:00+01:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Malene Roland Vils Pedersen, Sheldon Bailey, Randi Johansen Reidunsdatter https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/radopen/article/view/6140 2025-02-10T13:49:50+01:00 Karen Brage kabr2@ucl.dk Susanne Holm suho@ucl.dk Svea Deppe Mørup svea.deppe.moerup@rsyd.dk Malene Roland Vils Pedersen malene12@mail.tele.dk

<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Denmark sonographers, undergo profound training and have a notable presence in clinical practice. Understanding the factors behind their limited research engagement is important. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing sonographers' research involvement, focusing on motivational elements and barriers. Our investigation was structured around three key research questions: a) What motivates sonographers to engage in research? b) What obstacles hinder their involvement? c) How can we enhance the participation of sonographers in research in Denmark?</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had an explorative inductive qualitative approach. The data collection method was a focus group session with sonographers from the National Sonographers Network.</p> <p>The focus group session followed a structured guide and was verbatim transcribed. Thematic analysis by coding and identifying themes was performed individually by three authors. Subsequently, Social Cognitive Theory was incorporated as a framework for further analysis.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding motivations for engaging in research, the themes were Impact on Practice and Personal Interest. In terms of obstacles to research involvement, the themes included Challenges in Staffing and Time Management, Low Priority and Interest, Limited Research Experience and Practical Skills, and Insufficient Support. Regarding enhancements for participation, the themes were Management and Communications and Networks.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Sonographers in Danish public radiology departments demonstrate a high interest in research, driven by personal and clinical practice impacts. Their intrinsic motivation fosters idea generation and collaboration in research. Key barriers include heavy workloads and limited research skills. Cultivating a supportive, research-friendly environment is important for meaningful participation. Enhancing management and colleague support can bridge existing gaps and encourage active research engagement.</p>

2025-05-07T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Karen Brage, Susanne Holm, Svea Deppe Mørup, Malene Roland Vils Pedersen