Craft as Performed Knowledge
Embodied Practice and the Preservation of Craft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.6351Keywords:
Performative, craft, embodied knowledge, society, preservationAbstract
Craft knowledge extends beyond technical skill, encompassing embodied action, sensory awareness, and cultural transmission. This article challenges conventional approaches to preserving craft, such as archiving and documentation, by proposing that craft is fundamentally performative and must be conserved as such. Here, ‘performative’ does not refer to theatrical performance or performance art but to knowledge that is enacted through doing. It is important to distinguish between the performative, as the lived performance of craft knowledge, and performance art, the conservation theory of which centrally informs our discussion. Thus, we understand the performed and performative as modes of learning and continuity embedded in bodily practice. Drawing on the central outputs of the European Union’s Craft Hub Project – based on qualitative and participant observation – and on theories of performance and contemporary art conservation, we argue that craft practices are best maintained through active transmission, mentorship, and communal ‘making’. We highlight how preservation approaches developed for performance and time-based media art can inform new models for supporting craft as a living, evolving process. By framing performance as both the medium (the manner in which knowledge is expressed) and the method (how it endures), this work calls for a reorientation of cultural and institutional frameworks to ensure the continuity of craft knowledge.
References
Adamson, G. (2007). Thinking through craft. Berg.
Adamson, G. (2010). The craft reader. Berg.
Brookfield Craft Center. (n.d.). About Brookfield Craft. https://www.brookfieldcraft.org/
Craft Hub. (2024). About the project. https://www.crafthub.eu/about/
Crawford, M. (2009). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. Penguin.
Domínguez Rubio, F. (2014). Preserving the unpreservable: Docile and unruly objects at MoMA. Theory and Society, 43(6), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9233-4
Financial Times. (2024). Government ‘should consider French philanthropy model’ to boost arts funding. https://www.artsprofessional.co.uk/news/government-should-consider-french-philanthropy-model-to-boost-arts-funding
Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connecting: The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
Kaimal, G., Ray, K., & Muniz, J. (2017). Reduction of cortisol levels and participants' responses following art making. Art Therapy, 34(2), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2016.1166832
Kenning, G. (2015). “Fiddling with Threads”: Craft-based Textile Activities and Positive Well-being. TEXTILE, 13(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.2752/175183515x14235680035304
Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600213001
Laurenson, P. (2022). Introduction: Tony Conrad, Ten Years Alive on the Infinite Plain. In Reshaping the collectible: When artworks live in the museum. Tate. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/reshaping-the-collectible/introduction-tony-conrad-ten-years-alive-on-the-infinite-plain
Laurenson, P. (2025). The affective turn and the management of conservation within the museum. Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 48(3), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2025.2547671
Lepecki, A. (2010). The body as archive: Will to reenact and the afterlives of dances. Dance Research Journal, 42(2), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767700001029
Lucie-Smith, E. (1981). The story of craft: The craftsman’s role in society. Phaidon.
Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399687
Marchand, T. H. J. (2010). Making knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body and environment. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16(S1), S1–S21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x
Marçal, H. (2022). Ecologies of memory in the conservation of Ten Years Alive on the Infinite Plain. In Reshaping the Collectible: When artworks live in the museum. Tate. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/reshaping-the-collectible/conrad-ecologies-memory
Metcalf, B. (1997). Craft and art, culture and biology. In P. Dormer (Ed.), The culture of craft: Status and future (pp. 67–77). Manchester University Press.
Niedderer, K., & Townsend, K. (2014). Designing craft research: Joining emotion and knowledge. The Design Journal, 17(4), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480221
Nimkulrat, N., & Groth, C. (Eds.). (2024). Craft and design practice from an embodied perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003328018
Our Creative Future. (2023). Regional Arts Commission of St. Louis. https://racstl.org/wp-content/uploads/Regional-Arts-Commission-of-St.-Louis-Arts-A-Creative-Vision-for-St.-Louis.pdf.
Penland School of Craft. (n.d.). About us. https://penland.org/about-us/
Polanyi, M. (1966, 2009). The tacit dimension. Doubleday Anchor/University of Chicago Press.
Pöllänen, S. (2015). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being: Textile craft makers' descriptions of their leisure activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950351
Risatti, H. (2007). A theory of craft: Function and aesthetic expression. University of North Carolina Press.
Schneider, R. (2001). Performance remains. Performance Research, 6(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2001.10871792
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press.
Smithsonian Folklife. (2023). Models of craft education: Creativity in between. https://folklife.si.edu/magazine/models-of-craft-education-creativity-in-between
Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390404-001
The Sloyd Experience. (2023). Program overview. https://www.sloydexperience.org/program
Townsend, K., & Niedderer, K. (2020). Designing craft research for health and wellbeing. In K. Niedderer, S. Clune, & G. Ludden (Eds.), Design for behaviour change: Theories and practices of designing for change. Routledge.
Zhan, X., & Walker, S. (2019). Craft as leverage for sustainable design transformation: A theoretical foundation. The Design Journal, 22(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1613040
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Robert Wiley, Rita Macedo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
The material will be published OpenAccess with a Creative Commons 4.0 License which allows anyone to read, share and adapt the content, even commercially under the licence terms:
This work needs to be appropriately attributed/credited, a link must be provided to the CC-BY 4.0 licence, and changes made need to be indicated in a reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests that the licensor endorses you or your use.
Cited by
