Estonian and Finnish teachers’ experiences of textile craft purposes in basic education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4632Emneord (Nøkkelord):
Estonian craft education, Finnish craft education, adolescents, craft teachersSammendrag
This study investigates the purpose of craft education and how this purpose manifests according to Estonian and Finnish textile craft teachers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight teachers. The interview transcriptions were analysed using a qualitative content analysis method, resulting in seven main categories that revealed how the purpose of learning crafts manifests in compulsory basic education. According to the teachers, besides enhancing learning practical skills and how to use hands more skilfully, consistent craft making also enhances students’ versatile thinking; generates holistic practices; nurtures confidence, perseverance and sense of responsibility; shapes mature ways of expressing feelings; develops personal authenticity; and promotes social connectedness.
Referanser
Aktas, B. M. (2021). You have one new message: Knitting intimacy for connecting opinions, people and the world. FormAkademisk,14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4174
Borgen, J. S., & Hjardemaal, F. R. (2017). From general transfer to deep learning as argument for practical aesthetic school subjects? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(3), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1352439
Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L., & Suleiman, A. (2018). Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature, 554, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25770
Driscoll, R. (2013). Postscript: Rehabilitating the hand: Reflections of a haptic artist. In Z. Radman (Ed.), Hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental (pp. 421–427). MIT Press.
Fancourt, D., & Finn, S. (2019). Health Evidence Network (HEN). Synthesis Report 67. What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329834/9789289054553-eng.pdf
Flick, U. (2008). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208826
Galletta, A. (2012). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814732939.001.0001
Gaul, D., & Issartel, J. (2015). Fine motor skill proficiency in typically developing children: On or off the maturation track? Human Movement Science, 46, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.12.011
Grönman, S., & Lindfors, E. (2021). The process models of design thinking: A literature review and consideration from the perspective of craft, design and technology education. Techne Series – Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 28(2), 110–118. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/4352
Huotilainen, M., Rankanen, M., Groth, C., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Mäkelä, M. (2018). Why our brains love arts and crafts: Implications of creative practices on psychophysical well-being. FormAkademisk, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1908
Illum, B., & Johansson, M. (2012). Transforming physical materials into artefacts: Learning in the school’s practice of Sloyd. Techne Series – Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 19(1). https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/393
Jensen, E. (2001). Arts with the brain in mind. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Johansson, M. (2019). Materiella och immateriella resurser - hållbar utveckling i och genom slöjd. [Material and immaterial resources - sustainable development in and through slöjd subject] Nordic Studies in Education, 39(3), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2019-03-04
Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 121–123). Sage Publications.
Kleemeier, R. (1954). Age changes in psychomotor capacity and productivity. The Journal of Business, 27(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1086/294019
Kokko, S., Eronen, L., & Sormunen, K. (2015). Crafting maths: Exploring mathematics learning through crafts. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 20(2), 22–31.
Kokko, S., & Dillon, P. (2016). Engaging trainee teachers with crafts and cultural heritage. International Journal of Education through Art, 12(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.12.1.21_1
Kokko, S., Kouhia, A., & Kangas, K. (2020). Finnish craft education in turbulence. Techne Series – Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 27(1), 1–19. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/3562
Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). InterViews. Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. SAGE.
Lind, E. (2005). Ajatud tööõpetuse õpetamisega seonduvad probleemid [Timeless problems related to the tuition of craft]. In E. Lind (Ed.), Craft and home economics nowadays (pp. 94−107). Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Lind, E. (2012). The content and aims of handicraft as a subject in Estonian general education schools pursuant to social requirements. CFMAE JOURNAL Creativity, Musicality and Wellbeing, 87−99.
Lind, E., & Veeber, E. (2015). The attainment of the ideas of handicraft and home economics syllabus in school reality. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP), 8, 122–129. https://llufb.llu.lv/conference/REEP/2015/Latvia-Univ-Agricult-REEP-2015proceedings.pdf
Lindfors, E. (2012). Design learning in basic education in the Nordic countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.552
Marjanen, P. (2012). Koulukäsityö vuosina 1866-2003: Kodin hyvinvointiin kasvattavista tavoitteista kohti elämänhallinnan taitoja [The school crafts in 1866-2003: Changed targets from educating for the wellbeing of the home to life skills]. (Publication No. 344) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku]. https://www.utupub.fi/handle/10024/83445
Marjanen, P., & Metsärinne, M. (2019). The development of craft education in Finnish schools. Nordic Journal of Educational History, 6(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.36368/njedh.v6i1.124
Mathison, S. (2005). Encyclopaedia of evaluation. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950558
McGinn, C. (2015). Prehension. The hand and the emergence of humanity. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10204.001.0001
Murrihy, M., Bailey, M., & Roodenburg, J. (2017). Psychomotor ability and short-term memory, and reading and mathematics achievement in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(5), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx033
Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
Ojala, M., Karppinen, S., Syrjäläinen, E., & Kokko, S. (2021). Teachers' pedagogical tact in craft-art learning situations: Pathic perceiving, acting and interacting. FormAkademisk, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4822
Oltedal, E., Gamlem, S. M., Kleivenes, O. M., Ryslett, K., & Vasset, T. (2016). Teachers’ assessment experiences and perceptions in the practical-aesthetic subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(6), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066431
Paas, K., & Palojoki, P. (2018). Aims and challenges of handicraft and home economics education in Estonia. Consumer Studies, 43(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12509
Porko-Hudd, M., Pöllänen, S., & Lindfors, E. (2018). Common and holistic crafts education in Finland. Techne Series – Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 25(3), 26–38. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/3025
Pöllänen, S. (2009). Contextualizing craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01619.x
Pöllänen, S., & Urdzina-Deruma, M. (2017). Future-oriented reform of craft education. The cases of Finland and Latvia. In E. Kimonen & R. Nevalainen (Eds.), Reforming teaching and teacher education: Bright prospects for active schools (pp. 117–144). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_5
Pärli, M. (2019, May 17). Tööõpetus poistele, käsitöö tüdrukutele - koolid rikuvad soopõhise tundidesse jagamisega seadust [Wood and metal crafts for boys, textile crafts for girls - schools break the law by dividing students into gender-based craft classes]. Eesti Rahvusringhääling. https://www.err.ee/939991/tooopetus-poistele-kasitoo-tudrukutele-koolid-rikuvad-soopohise-tundidesse-jagamisega-seadust
Rönkkö, M.-L., Mommo, S., & Aerila, J.-A. (2016). The teachers’ views on the significance of the design and craft teaching in Finland. Design and Technology Education, 21(2), 49–58.
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
Schiro, M. (2012). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Sage.
Steinberg, L. D. (2015). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books.
Syrjäläinen, E. (2003). Käsityön opettajan pedagogisen tiedon lähteeltä: Persoonalliset toimintatavat ja periaatteet käsityön opetuksen kontekstissa [On the source of a craft teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Personal procedures and principles in craft teaching context] (Publication No. 12) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Helsinki. Department of Home Economics and Craft Science.
Taar, J. (2017). Interthinking in Estonian home economics education. (Publication No. 16) [Doctoral dissertation,]. University of Helsinki. Unigrafia.
Taar. J., & Koppel, K. (2021). Random survival or conscious development: Estonian handicraft and home economics teachers’ experiences during distance education. International Journal of Home Economics, 14(2), 134–142.
Vabariigi Valitsus. (2014). Põhikooli riiklik õppekava [National curriculum for basic schools]. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014020
Vannini, P., & Franzese, A. (2008). The authenticity of self: Conceptualization, personal experience, and practice. Sociology Compass, 2, 1621–1637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00151.x
Veeber, E., Syrjäläinen, E., & Lind, E. (2015). A discussion of the necessity of craft education in the 21st century. Techne Series – Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 22(1). https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/875
Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Understanding self-regulation: An introduction. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 1–9). Guilford Press.
WHO (2014). Health for the world’s adolescents: A second chance in the second decade. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/files/1612_MNCAH_HWA_Executive_Summary.pdf
Yliverronen, V., Rönkkö, M.-L., & Kangas, K. (2021). Learning everyday technologies through playful experimenting and cooperative making in pre-primary education. FormAkademisk, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4198
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2023 Eva Veeber, Erja Syrjäläinen, Sirpa Kokko
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Forfatteren(e) beholder sin opphavs- og kopieringsrett til eget manuskript, men gir tidsskriftet varig rett til 1) å fremføre manuskriptet for offentligheten i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, og 2) å registreres og siteres som første publisering av manuskriptet.
- Forfatteren må selv forvalte sine økonomiske kopieringsrettigheter overfor eventuell tredjepart.
- Tidsskriftet gir ingen økonomisk eller annen kompensasjon for innsendte bidrag, medmindre det er gjort særskilt avtale om dette med forfatteren(e).
- Tidsskriftet plikter å arkivere manuskriptet (inklusive metadata) i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, i minst ett dertil egnet åpent tilgjengelig langtidsarkiv for digitalt materiell, som for eksempel i de norske universitetenes institusjonsarkiv innen rammen av NORA-samarbeidet.
- Lesere av tidsskriftet kan ta utskrift av de fremførte manuskriptene under samme betingelser som gjelder ved kopiering av fysiske eksemplar. Dette innebærer at masseframstilling av fysiske eksemplar, eller framstilling av eksemplar for kommersielle formål, ikke er tillatt uten etter avtale med forfatteren(e).
Cited by
