Conceptualising public sector innovation: Introducing the lens of the epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3684Keywords:
public sector innovation, conceptualization, innovation theory, Network governance, public valueAbstract
Innovation is a relatively new concept in the public sector, and there is currently no broad agreement regarding how to understand and conceptualise it. This article assumes that a central role for research is to critically scrutinise and discuss what research does—or could do—when applying the concept of public sector innovation, especially because innovation has become a powerful organising metaphor for policy and practice. The article initiates a meta-conceptual inquiry and discussion of public sector innovation as a research concept, suggesting a method of conceptual clarification for future research by breaking the concept down into different dimensions. Methodologically, the article conducts a meta-conceptual analysis and inquiry into research positions and discussions in public sector innovation, thus reflecting the academic activity/enterprise of conceptualising. By discussing selected literature from the public sector innovation field, three conceptual dimensions emerge: epistemological, pragmatic and normative dimensions. These dimensions refer to questions about what kind of knowledge the concept of public sector innovation represents, what its pragmatic or practical implications are and which normative or value dimensions the concept implies. Finally, the concluding discussion highlights questions for research(ers) to address in future reflections on the conceptualisation of public sector innovation.
References
Special issue Nordic Journal of Social Research: Public Sector Innovation– Conceptual and Methodological Implications
Guest editors:
Associate Professor Ann Karin Tennås Holmen, University of Stavanger, Annkarin.holmen@uis.no
Postdoctoral Fellow Maria Røhnebæk, Innland Norway University of applied science, Maria.Rohnebak@inn.no
References:
Agger, A., Damgaard, B., Krogh A. H., & Sørensen, E. (2015). Introduction. In A. Agger, B. Damgaard, A. H. Krogh & E. Sørensen (Eds.), Collaborative governance and public innovation in Northern Europe (pp. 3-22). Bentham e-books. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681080130115010004
Albury, D. (2005). Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 51-56.
Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. Routledge.
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgnsd
Becheikh, N., Halilem, N., Jbilou, J., Mosconi, E., Hammami, H., & Landry, R. (2007). Conceptualization and determinants of innovation in the public sector: A systematic review [Paper presented]. 14th Reser International Conference on service Competitiveness and Cohesion, Tampera, Finland, September 2007.
Benington, J. (2011). From private choice to public value. In J. Benington & M. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 31-51). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8_2
Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington & M. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 1-30). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8_1
Bekkers, V., Tummers, L., & Voorberg, W. (2013). From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector: A literature review of relevant drivers and barriers [Paper presented]. EGPA 2013 Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15-33.
Brown, L., & Osborne, S. (2013). Risk and innovation. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.707681
Buchheim, L., Krieger, A., & Arndt, S. (2020). Innovation types in public sector organizations: A systematic review of the literature. Management Review Quarterly, 70, 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00174-5
Callon, M. (2010). Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2010.494119
Chen, J., Walker, R., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: A typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674-1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874
Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(1), 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477
Copp, D. (2001). Morality, normativity and society. Oxford University Press.
Crosby, B. C., 't Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495-522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun021
Dancy, J. (2002). Editor's introduction. In J. Dancy (Ed.), Normativity (pp. vii-xv). Blackwell Publishers.
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
Du Gay, P., & Vikkelsø, S. (2017). For formal organization: The past in the present and future of organization theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198705123.001.0001
Eriksen, E. O. (1999). Kommunikativ ledelse - om styring av offentlige organisasjoner. Fagbokforlaget.
Etymonline.com. (n.d.). Concept. In Etymonline.com. https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=concept
Fuglsang, L., & Rønning, R. (2014). Introduction: Framing innovation in public service sectors: A contextual approach. In L. Fuglsang, R. Rønning, & B. Enquist (Eds.), Framing innovation in public sector services (pp. 1-17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885612
Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011). The balance between bricolage and innovation: Management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.504302
Gieske, H., van Buuren, A., & Bekkers, V. (2016). Conceptualizing public innovative capacity: A framework for assessment. The Innovation Journal, 21(1), 1-25.
Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: The history of a category. Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 1. INRS.
Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315855608
Goodman, R. B. (1995). Introduction. In R. B. Goodman (Ed.), Pragmatism: A contemporary reader (pp. 1-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061502-1
Gow, J. I. (2014). Public sector innovation theory revisited. The Innovation Journal, 19(2), 1-22.
Haag, S. (2003). Klassisk og senere pragmatisme. In P. Lübke (Ed.), Engelsk og Amerikansk Filosofi: Videnskab og Sprog (pp. 529-543). Politikens Forlag.
Hansen, A. V., & Madsen, S. (2019). Theorizing in organization studies - Insights from key thinkers. Edward Elgar.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27-34.
Hartley, J. (2011). Public value through innovation and improvement. In J. Bennington & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 171-184). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8_10
Hartley, J. (2014). New development: Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation. Public Money and Management, 34(3), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.908034
Hartley, J. (2016). Organisational and governance aspects of diffusing public innovation. In J. Torfing & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance (pp. 95-113). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105337.005
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
Hartley, J, Alford, J., Knies, E., & Douglas, S. (2017). Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review, 19(5), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192166
Kattel, R., Cepilovs, A., Drechsler, W., Kalvet, T., Lember, V., & Tônurist, P. (2014). Can we measure public sector innovation? A literature review. LIPSE Project Working Paper No. 2. www.lipse.org
King, C. S., & Martinelli, A. S. (2005). Introduction - Innovations in citizen engagement and empowerment: Beyond boundaries. The Innovation Journal, 10(1), 1-8.
Langergaard, L. L., Rasmussen, S. B., & Sørensen, A. (2006). Viden, Videnskab og Virkelighed. Samfundslitteratur.
Langergaard, L. L. (2011). Innovating the 'publicness' of the public sector? A critical, philosophical discussion of public sector innovation [Doctoral thesis, Roskilde University].
Langergaard, L. L. (2019). Social innovation learning from critical social entrepreneurship studies: How are they critical and why do we need them? In S. Carney, S. Banerjee, & L. Hulgård (Eds.), People centered social innovation: Global perspectives on an emerging paradigm (pp. 17-41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351121026-2
Moltesen, J., & Dahlerup, S. (2008). Dekoblingspolitik: Visioner og initiativer i den danske regerings innovationspolitik. Forlaget Politiske Studier.
Moore, M. H. (2005). Break-through innovations and continuous improvement: Two different models of innovative processes in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 43-50.
Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
Moore, M. H. (2014). Public value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12198
Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit.
OPSI (Observatory for Public Sector Innovation) (2020). Public Sector Innovation Scan of Denmark. Retrieved at (22.11.2021): https://www.coi.dk/media/53245/public-sector-innovation-scan-denmark_017.pdf
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public service delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x
O'Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x
Paulsen, M. (2011). Innovationsbegrebets dialektik i en uddannelseskontekst - en strid mellem forskellige innovationsforståelser. In M. Paulsen & S. H. Klausen (Eds.), Innovation og læring - filosofiske og kritiske perspektiver (pp. 13-48). Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Pollitt, C. (2011). Innovation in the public sector: An introductory overview. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector (pp. 23-28). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520_2
Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2017). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What's next? Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122
Sannerstedt, A. (2003). Implementering - hur politiske beslut genomförs i praktiken. In B. Rothstein (Ed.), Politik som organisation: Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem (pp. 18-48). SNS Förlag.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The theory of economic development. Transaction Publishers.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011a). Samarbejdsdreven innovation i den offentlige sektor. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Samarbejdsdrevet innovation - i den offentlige sektor (pp. 19-37). Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011b). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration and Society, 43(8), 842-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711418768
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
Swedberg, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: The view of the young Schumpeter. In C. Steyaert & D. Hjort (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as social change (pp. 21-34). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847204424.00010
Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248
Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367-1384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01942.x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Luise Li Langergaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
