Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays
Radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529Keywords:
Radiography students, Chest X-rays, Abnormality detection, TrainingAbstract
Introduction Chest X-rays are the most frequently requested X-ray imaging in English hospitals. This study aimed to assess final year UK radiography student’s confidence and ability in image interpretation of chest X-rays.
Methods Thirty-three diagnostic radiography students were invited to assess their confidence and ability in interpreting chest x-rays from a bank of n=10 cases using multiple choice answers. Data analysis included 2x2 contingency tables, Kappa for inter-rater reliability, a Likert scale of confidence for each case, and questions to assess individual interpretation skills and ways to increase the learning of the subject.
Results Twenty-three students participated in the study. The pooled accuracy achieved was 61% (95% CI 38.4-77.7; k=0.22). The degree of confidence and ability varied depending upon the student and the conditions observed. High confidence was noted with COVID-19 (n=12/23; 52%), lung metastasis (n=14/23; 61%), and pneumothorax (n=13/23; 57%). Low confidence was noted with conditions of consolidation (n=8/23; 35%), haemothorax (n=8/23; 35%), and surgical emphysema (n=8/23; 35%). From the sample n=11 (48%), participants stated they felt they had the knowledge to interpret chest X-rays required for a newly qualified radiographer.
Conclusion The results demonstrated final year radiography student’s confidence and ability in image interpretation of chest X-rays. Student feedback indicated a preference for learning support through university lectures, online study resources, and time spent with reporting radiographers on clinical practice to improve ability and confidence in interpreting chest X-rays.
References
National Health Service England. Diagnostic Imaging Dataset for February 2021. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/06/Provisional-Monthly-Diagnostic-Imaging-Dataset-Statistics-2021-06-17.pdf
National Health Service England. Diagnostic Imaging Dataset for February 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/06/Provisional-Monthly-Diagnostic-Imaging-Dataset-Statistics-2018-06-21.pdf
Albahli S, Yar GN. Fast and Accurate Detection of COVID-19 Along With 14 Other Chest Pathologies Using a Multi-Level Classification: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e23693. https://doi.org/10.2196/23693
Henostroza G, Harris JB, Kancheya N, Nhandu V, Musopole R, Krüüner A, Chileshe C, Dunn IJ, Reid SE. Chest radiograph reading and recording system: evaluation in frontline clinicians in Zambia. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1460-z
Society of Radiographers. Preliminary Clinical Evaluation and Clinical Reporting by Radiographers: Policy and Practice Guidance. 2013. https://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/preliminary-clinical-evaluation-and-clinical-reporting-radiographers-policy-and-practice-guidance
Kranz R, Cosson P. Anatomical and/or pathological predictors for the “incorrect” classification of red dot markers on wrist radiographs taken following trauma. Brit J Radiol 2015;88(1046):20140503. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140503
Hazell L, Motto J, Chipeya L. The influence of image interpretation training on the accuracy of abnormality detection and written comments on musculoskeletal radiographs by South African radiographers. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 2015;46(3):302-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.03.002
Health and Care Professions Council. The standard of proficiency for radiographers. 2013. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-proficiency/radiographers/
McLaughlin L, Bond R, Hughes C, McConnell J, McFadden S. Computing eye gaze metrics for the automatic assessment of radiographer performance during X-ray image interpretation. International journal of medical informatics. 2017 Sep 1;105:11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.03.001
McLaughlin L, McConnell J, McFadden S, Bond R, Hughes C. Methods employed for chest radiograph interpretation education for radiographers: A systematic review of the literature. Radiography 2017;23(4):350-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.07.013
Toomey RJ, Chen M, Davies K, Fernandes K, Olav S, Heitmann MS, Molehe MM, Dorota P, Pettka JA. Does training have an impact on radiography students’ approach to chest X-ray image quality assessment?. OPTIMAX 2018. 2019:113. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carst-Buissink/publication/331994287_O_P_TI_M_A_X_2_0_18_a_focus_on_Education_in_Radiology/links/5c9a4c09299bf1116949895a/O-P-TI-M-A-X-2-0-18-a-focus-on-Education-in-Radiology.pdf#page=113
Wright C, Reeves P. Image interpretation performance: A longitudinal study from novice to professional. Radiography 2017;23(1):e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2016.08.006
Jeffrey DR, Goddard PR, Callaway MP, Greenwood R. Chest radiograph interpretation by medical students. Clin Radiol 2003;58(6):478-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00113-2
Ball V, Chiu CS, Lian YP, Lingeswaran L. Final year physiotherapy student’s reliability in chest X-ray interpretation. Physiother Theor Pr 2018;34(1):54-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1360423
Murphy A, Ekpo E, Steffens T, Neep MJ. Radiographic image interpretation by Australian radiographers: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 2019;66(4):269-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.356
Google. Google Forms online platform 2021. https://docs.google.com/forms/u/0/
Royal College of Radiologists. Final Examination for the Fellowship in Clinical Radiology. Part A: Specimen Questions. 2021. https://www.rcr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/SpecimenSBAQuestions-CR2A.pdf
McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica. 2012 Oct 15;22(3):276-82. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Warrens MJ. New interpretations of Cohen’s Kappa. Journal of Mathematics 2014. pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/203907
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar 1:159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Darling-Hammond L, Flook L, Cook-Harvey C, Barron B, Osher D. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci 2020;24(2):97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Ekpo EU, Egbe NO, Akpan BE. Radiographers' performance in chest X-ray interpretation: the Nigerian experience. Brit J Radiol 2015;88(1051):20150023. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150023
Stevens BJ, White N. Newly qualified radiographers' perceptions of their abnormality detection abilities and the associated training they received at undergraduate level. Radiography. 2018 Aug 1;24(3):219-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.01.004
Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of continuing professional development. 2018. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-continuing-professional-development
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Paul Lockwood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
