Radiography students´ experience using e-learning module in the subject nuclear medicine
Radiografstudenters erfaring ved bruk av en nettbasert studiemodul i emnet nukleærmedisin. Hvordan kan nettbaserte studiemoduler bidra til motivasjon og aktivitet?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4706Abstract
Bachelor's degree in radiography is a high-tech health education. The subject nuclear medicine has been characterized by traditional and passive teaching methods with demotivated and inactive radiography students. As a tool to promote student activity, motivation, and learning, we developed and applied a new digital online teaching module in the subject nuclear medicine. In this study, we seek answers to how different learning resources, activities and especially how an online teaching module affect the student's motivation, activity level and learning outcomes. We used an evaluation to obtain quantitative data from the radiography students' assessments and to elaborate answers related to the questionnaire we conducted a group interview. The online modules were described as motivating, activating, and provided better learning outcomes. Moreover, exam-relevant tests, feedbacks, as well as structure and information were perceived as important factors for motivation, activity and learning outcomes. Our main findings suggest that use of an online module should be designed in a pedagogic and a didactic way that promotes the cognitive and social aspect of learning in relation to the topic.
References
Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Amhag, L. (2017). Mobile-Assisted Seamless Learning Activities in Higher Distance Education v6 n3 p70-81 2017.
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K. & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
Bjørndal, A. & Hofoss, D. (2004). Statistikk for helse- og sosialfagene (2. utg. utg.). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
Bookallil, C. & Rolfe, J. (2016). University-Based Enabling Program Outcomes: Comparing Distance Education and Internal Study.
Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices AU - Koseoglu, Suzan. Distance Education, 39(4), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412452728
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J. & Kruger, J. (2003). Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
Education, E. U. H. L. G. o. t. M. o. H. (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions (9789279303609). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Hentet fra http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/high-level-group-on-the-modernisation-of-higher-education-pbNC0113156/
Hattie, J., Gurung, R. A. R. & Landrum, R. E. (2015). The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G. & Aston, R. (2015). Students' Everyday Engagement with Digital Technology in University: Exploring Patterns of Use and "Usefulness" v37 n3 p308-319 2015.
Humber, J. F. (2018). Student Engagement in Online Courses: A Grounded Theory Case Study Ed.D. Dissertation, The University of Alabama.
Imsen, G. (2005). Elevens verden : innføring i pedagogisk psykologi (4. utg. utg.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Jacobsen, D. I. (2015). Hvordan gjennomføre undersøkelser? : innføring i samfunnsvitenskapelig metode (3. utg. utg.). Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
Komulainen, T. M., Lindstrøm, C. & Sandtrø, T. A. (2015). Erfaringer med studentaktive læringsformer i teknologirikt undervisningsrom. Uniped, 38(04), 364-372. Hentet fra http://www.idunn.no/uniped/2015/04/erfaringer_med_studentaktive_laeringsformer_i_teknologirikt_
Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S., Anderssen, T. M. & Rygge, J. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju (3. utg., 2. oppl. utg.). Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
Ladstein, S. & Toft, G. O. (2013). Maur eller penger: Hvorfor velge og gjennomføre et nettstudium i naturfag? Uniped, 36(01), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.3402/uniped.v36i1.20955 ER
Larionova, V., Brown, K., Bystrova, T. & Sinitsyn, E. (2018). Russian perspectives of online learning technologies in higher education: An empirical study of a MOOC. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918763420
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C. & Roediger Iii, H. L. (2008). Test‐enhanced learning in medical education. Medical Education, 42(10), 959-966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x
Løvås, G. G. (2013). Statistikk for universiteter og høgskoler (3. utg. utg.). Oslo: Universitetsforl.
Laaser, W. & Toloza, E. A. (2019). The Changing Role of the Educational Video in Higher Distance Education v18 n2 p264-276 Apr 2017.
Meyer, M. E. (2014). E-Læring som pedagogisk virkemiddel for innlæring av anatomi, fysiologi og biokjemi i sykepleierutdanningen. Uniped, 37(01), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.3402/uniped.v37.22706
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the Evidence that Active Learning Works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Pettersen, R. C. (2005). Kvalitetslæring i høgere utdanning : innføring i problem- og praksisbasert didaktikk. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
Phillips, D. C., Soltis, J. F. & Plyhn, E. (2000). Læring : teorier og prinsipper for læring. Oslo: Abstrakt forl.
Powers, K. L., Brooks, P. J., Galazyn, M. & Donnelly, S. (2016). Testing the Efficacy of MyPsychLab to Replace Traditional Instruction in a Hybrid Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716636514
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Ringdal, K. (2018). Enhet og mangfold : samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning og kvantitativ metode (4. utg. utg.). Bergen: Fagbokforl.
Raaheim, A. (2016). Eksamensrevolusjonen : råd og tips om eksamen og alternative vurderingsformer. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
Schneider, M. & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Scott, F., Sarah, L. E., Miles, M., Michelle, K. S., Nnadozie, O., Hannah, J. & Mary Pat, W. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Shelton, C. C., Warren, A. E. & Archambault, L. M. (2016). Exploring the Use of Interactive Digital Storytelling Video: Promoting Student Engagement and Learning in a University Hybrid Course. TechTrends, 60(5), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0082-z
Thingnes, E. R., Stalsberg, R. & Sitter, B. (2015). Er forelesninga effektiv, interessant og meningsfull? - Oppfatninger om og betydningen av forelesninger som undervisningsform. Uniped, 38(04), 390-397. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1893-8981-2015-04-16
Yuhanna, I. ., Alexander, A. ., & Kachik, A. . (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of Online Learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 1(2), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i2.54
Ørnes, H., Gaard, H., Refsnes, S.I., Kristiansen, T og Wilhelmsen, J. (2015). Digital tilstand i høyere utdanning 2014.Norgesuniversitetets skriftserie 1/2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kurt Jonny Johansen, Richard Fjellaksel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
