Ripple Effects of Reporting Radiographers in Diagnostic Imaging Departments in Norway – An Interview Study

Ringvirkninger av beskrivende radiografer ved bildediagnostisk avdeling


  • Lise Lundanes Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk, Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, NTNU – Norges teknisk naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim, Norge
  • Ellisiv Sivertsen Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk, Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, NTNU – Norges teknisk naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim, Norge
  • Sigrid Veiby Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk, Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, NTNU – Norges teknisk naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim, Norge
  • Beathe Sitter NTNU



reporting radiographer, task allocation, X-ray, image interpretation, diagnostic imaging


Introduction: Reporting radiographers comprise a small occupational group in Norway. This is contrary to England, where they produce a significant proportion of the radiology reports. The system originates from the 1990s, and many previous studies have shown that reporting radiographers provide work of high quality. There are however few published studies on other effects from having reporting radiographers in diagnostic imaging departments. The purpose of this study was to find ripple effects experienced by reporting radiographers and radiographers in departments with a reporting radiographer.
Methods: This study has a qualitative design. In-depth interviews were done with three reporting radiographers and three radiographers who worked together with reporting radiographers. The interview subjects worked at five different Norwegian hospitals. The interviews took place digitally, and the audio recordings were transcribed before analysis through systematic text condensation.
Results: The analysis showed that radiographers experienced the reporting radiographers as easily accessible, and helpful with questions related to radiographic laboratory work. The reporting radiographers were used a lot for internal teaching in the department and felt that they increased awareness of their own and others' knowledge. They are also being used as a resource outside their own department.
Conclusion: Reporting radiographers have led to increased awareness of level of own knowledge among reporting radiographers and radiographers in the department. The reporting radiographers are acting like a missing link between the radiographers and the radiologists. Besides, their availability leads to more professional discussion and collaboration across different professions and departments.



Riksrevisjonen. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av bruken av poliklinisk bildediagnostikk. 2017 2017.

Helsedirektoratet. Uønskede hendelser ved radiologisk bildediagnostikk. 2017.

Helsedirektoratet. Strategi for rasjonell bruk av bildediagnostikk. 2019.


Kvamme R. Utviklingsprosjekt: Bruk av beskrivende radiografer i tolkning og rapportering av skjelettbilder ved Sykehuset i Vestfold HF. Nasjonalt topplederprogram; 2011 02.11.2011.

Berntsen A, Kjelle E, Myklebust AM. Reporting radiographers in Norway - A qualitative interview study. Radiography. 2023;29:6,

OsloMet. Videreutdanning for radiografer - tolkning og beskrivelse av skjelettrøntgenbilder 2023. Available from:

Woznitza N. Radiographer reporting. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61(2):66-8,

Culpan G, Culpan AM, Docherty P, Denton E. Radiographer reporting: A literature review to support cancer workforce planning in England. Radiography (Lond). 2019;25(2):155-63,

Brown N, Leschke P. Evaluating the true clinical utility of the red dot system in radiograph interpretation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(5):510-3,

Price RC. Radiographer reporting: Origins, demise and revival of plain film reporting. Radiography. 2001;7(2):13,

Thom SE. Does advanced practice in radiography benefit the healthcare system? A literature review. Radiography (Lond). 2018;24(1):84-9,

Clinical_radiology_UK_workforce. Clinical radiology UK workforce census 2020 report. UK: The royal college of Radiologists; 2020.

Wood K. How is the reporting radiographer role portrayed in published studies? A scoping review. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(1):215-21,

Cain G, Pittock LJ, Piper K, Venumbaka MR, Bodoceanu M. Agreement in the reporting of General Practitioner requested musculoskeletal radiographs: Reporting radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(2):288-95,

Buskov L, Abild A, Christensen A, Holm O, Hansen C, Christensen H. Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: a comparative plain film-reading performance study. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(1):55-8,

Bachmann R, Ingebrigtsen RL, Holm O, Christensen AF, Kurt EY, Hvolris JJ, et al. Comparison of reporting radiographers' and medical doctors' performance in reporting radiographs of the appendicular skeleton, referred by the emergency department. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(4):1099-104,

Cook AP, Oliver T, Ramsay L. Radiographer Reporting: Discussion and Australian workplace trial. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 2013;51(2):27,

Nol J, Isouard G, Mirecki J. Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation. J Digit Imaging. 2006;19(2):159-66,

Hagen G, Bronn R, Kristian Hol P, Neple BL, Lauritzen PM, Brogger HM, et al. Beskrivende radiografer er ikke løsningen. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2016;136(12-13):1068-9, doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0451.

Vigeland E, Hager AM. La radiografer beskrive røntgenbilder! Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2016;136(7):600,

Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning : en innføring. 3. utg. ed. Oslo: Universitetsforl.; 2011.

Cuthbertson LM. Skeletal trauma reporting; perceptions and experiences of radiographer practitioners exposed to the reporting role. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(1):35-41,

Snaith B, Milner RC, Harris MA. Beyond image interpretation: Capturing the impact of radiographer advanced practice through activity diaries. Radiography. 2016;22(4):6,

Cardiff Uo. Radiographic Reporting (PgCert). Available from:

Williams I, Baird M, Schneider M. Experiences of radiographers working alone in remote locations: A Far North Queensland non-participant observational study. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(4):e284-e9,

Norsk radiografforbund, Yrkesetiske retningslinjer for radiografer, (2021),

Helsepersonellkommisjonen. Tid for handling. Personellet i en bærekraftig helse- og omsorgstjeneste Norge: Norges offentlige utredninger, Helsedepartementet; 2023 02.02.2023.

Lekve K, Olsen DS, Fevolden AM. Glidende overgang. Flaskehalser og oppgavedeling i bildediagnostikk. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning; 2013.

Helle J. Jobbglidning – trussel eller mulighet? Overlegen. 2012;1(1):2,

van Schalkwyk MC, Bourek A, Kringos DS, Siciliani L, Barry MM, De Maeseneer J, et al. The best person (or machine) for the job: Rethinking task shifting in healthcare. Health Policy. 2020;124(12):1379-86,

Norsk_radiologisk_forening. Beskrivende radiografer: Den norske legeforening; 2016. Available from:

Kvilhaugsvik B, Husøy G. Må samarbeide mer på tvers. Sykepleien. 2017;105(3):4,

Helsedirektoratet. Oppfølging av personer med store og sammensatte behov. 2017.



How to Cite

Lundanes, L., Sivertsen, E., Veiby, S., & Sitter, B. (2023). Ripple Effects of Reporting Radiographers in Diagnostic Imaging Departments in Norway – An Interview Study: Ringvirkninger av beskrivende radiografer ved bildediagnostisk avdeling. Radiography Open, 9(1), 27–42.




Cited by