Optimizing Real-Time Advanced Ultrasound Supervision in a University Setting
A technical feasibility study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5703Keywords:
Tele-ultrasound, telemedicine, ultrasound training, smartphone-supervisionAbstract
Introduction: Ultrasound-based diagnosis requires great expertise for reliability and accuracy, thus practical training is vital. Digital training can offer students the possibility of practical training in their local setups. However, there are critical issues that remote educators must address, particularly in advanced ultrasound training. The present study was therefore aiming at developing a suitable technical setup for supervision and education in tele-ultrasound that can be applied to a variety of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic areas.
Methods: Using an action research approach including four cycles of action, we tested four technical setups with different software and hardware components across four ultrasound courses. Based on evaluation forms, written reflections, and two focus group interviews from the four cycles of action, respectively, we modified the setups to improve the technical solution for the next cycle.
Results: The initial set-up was using commercial video call apps via mobile phones. Although no additional equipment or expertise was required, it was precluded by the poor image quality and motion blur resulting from capturing the ultrasound image on the smartphone. Nevertheless, this solution is viable when quick clarifications are needed. Additional stabilization support in the second set-up did not provide satisfactory image quality. The best technical solution was found in the third set-up, using a frame grabber and Reacts, which allows simultaneous live streaming of the ultrasound screen image and two web cameras. However, the cumbersome software interface, the need for an expensive user license, and problems with the internet connection reduced the acceptability of this setup. The optimal setup in cycle four, was a reasonable frame grabber, and Zoom, which is free, has a simple user interface and can stream live audio-visual ultrasound data from the probe and user simultaneously. Its annotation function is also beneficial in supervision.
Conclusion: Through an action research approach including four cycles of action and thorough, subsequent evaluations, we found that a videoconferencing platform, such as Zoom, a computer, and a frame grabber connected to the ultrasound scanner was the optimal solution as this set-up is simple and affordable and is facilitating a good video-transmitted learning situation for students and supervisors. This technical set-up could therefore be suitable for a wide range of remote ultrasound courses.
References
Constantinescu EC, Nicolau C, Săftoiu A (2018) Recent developments in tele-ultrasonography. Curr Health Sci J 44(2):101-6. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.44.02.01
Dietrich CF, Goudie A, Chiorean L, Cui XW, Gilja OH, Dong Y, et al. (2017) Point of care ultrasound: A WFUMB position paper. Ultrasound Med Biol 43(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.021
Nicholls D, Sweet L, Hyett J (2014) Psychomotor skills in medical ultrasound imaging: An analysis of the core skill set. J Ultrasound Med 33(8):1349-52. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.8.1349
Bowra J, Dawson M, Goudie A, Mallin M (2015) Sounding out the future of ultrasound education. Ultrasound 23(1):48-52. doi:10.1177/1742271X14563
Milde FK (1988) The function of feedback in psychomotor-skill learning. West J Nurs Res 10(4):425-34. doi:10.1177/019394598801000406
Schmidt RA (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 82(4):225-60. doi:10.1037/h0076770
Drake AE, Hy J, MacDougall GA, Holmes B, Icken L, Schrock JW, et al. (2021) Innovations with tele-ultrasound in education sonography: The use of tele-ultrasound to train novice scanners. Ultrasound J 13(1):6. doi:10.1186/s13089-021-00210-0
Wagner M, Shen-Wagner J, Zhang KX, Flynn T, Bergman K (2018) Point-of-care ultrasound applications in the outpatient clinic. South Med J 111(7):404-10. doi:10.14423/smj.0000000000000835
Zwank MD, Gordon BD, Truman SM (2017) Refining the Wild Wild West of Point-of-care ultrasound at an academic community hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 14(12):1574-7.e3. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.002
Hashim A, Tahir MJ, Ullah I, Asghar MS, Siddiqi H, Yousaf Z (2021) The utility of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS). Ann Med Surg (Lond) 71:102982. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102982
Poland S, Frey JA, Khobrani A, Ondrejka JE, Ruhlin MU, George RL, et al. (2018) Telepresent focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination training versus traditional training for medical students: A simulation-based pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 37(8):1985-92. doi:10.1002/jum.14551
Sagor R (2000) Guiding school improvement with action research. ACSD, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
Hung YT, Wu CF, Liang TH, Chou SS, Chen GL, Wu PN, et al. (2019) Developing a decision-aid website for breast cancer surgery: An action research approach. J Med Internet Res 21(2):e10404. doi: 10.2196/10404
Malterud K. (2012) Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health.40(8):795-805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030
Prosch H, Radzina M, Dietrich CF, Nielsen MB, Baumann S, Ewertsen C, et al. (2020) Ultrasound curricula of student education in Europe: Summary of the experience. Ultrasound Int Open 6(1):E25-e33. doi: 10.1055/a-1183-3009
Aslaksen A, Pedersen R Marthinsen PB, Kløw NE (2011) Teleradiologi i Norge. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 131(9-10):931. Available via https://tidsskriftet.no/sites/default/files/pdf2011--931.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2023
Britton N, Miller MA, Safadi S, Siegel A, Levine AR, McCurdy MT (2019) Tele-Ultrasound in resource-limited settings: A systematic review. Front Public Health 7:244. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00244
Otterlei T, Fjørtoft KG (2017) Bredbåndshastigheten i Norge nidoblet på åtte år. Available via https://www.ssb.no/teknologi-og-innovasjon/artikler-og-publikasjoner/bredbandshastigheten-i-norge-nidoblet-de-siste-atte-arene. Accessed 15 May 2023.
Soni NJ, Boyd JS, Mints G, Proud KC, Jensen TP, Liu G, et al. (2021) Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultrasound J 13(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13089-021-00242-6
McBeth P, Crawford I, Tiruta C, Xiao Z, Zhu GQ, Shuster M, et al. (2013) Help is in your pocket: The potential accuracy of smartphone- and laptop-based remotely guided resuscitative telesonography. Telemed J E Health 19(12):924-30. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0034
Ferreira AC, O'Mahony E, Oliani AH, Araujo Júnior E, da Silva Costa F (2015) Teleultrasound: historical perspective and clinical application. Int J Telemed Appl. 2015:306259. doi:10.1155/2015/306259
Recker F, Höhne E, Damjanovic D, Schäfer VS (2022) Ultrasound in telemedicine: A brief overview. Applied Sciences 12(3):958. doi:10.3390/app12030958
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nina Hanger, Lydia Johnsen, Ruth Stoklund Thomsen, Ragna Stalsberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).