A quality improvement project addressing motion artefact on CTPAs in a district general hospital setting: A complete cycle resulting in changed practice.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5931Keywords:
computed tomography pulmonary angiogram, Pulmonary Embolism, pulmonary CT angiography, quality improvement, breath holding, motion artefact, ArtefactAbstract
Introduction: A still breath hold from the patient is one of the key requirements for a diagnostic computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). It is important for the timely identification and treatment of patients with life threatening pulmonary emboli (PEs). Motion artefact on CTPA can cause blurring, double borders, shading and streaking in the lungs, which can either obscure PEs or create artefact that mimics PEs. This risks patient harm from delayed diagnoses, missed PEs, false positives and extra radiation and contrast exposure due to repeat studies.
Methods: We devised local standards and methodology for assessing the presence and degree of motion artefact on CTs. The study consisted of initial data collection, implementation of changes to clinical practice, and subsequent repeat data collection 3 months after implementation of interventions. For each data collection round, 100 consecutive inpatient and emergency CTPAs performed in a UK District General Hospital were retrospectively identified and images reviewed to categorise each as having either: ‘no significant’, ‘minor’ or ‘major’ motion artefact. There were no exclusions. Interventions after initial data collection included a multidisciplinary meeting with radiographers, department assistants, and radiologists to devise changes to workflow and practices to build in 'rehearsal' of a breath-hold and explanation of breathing instructions with patients before scanning. A prompting phrase for this was added to our CTPA scanning protocol.
Results: Initial results demonstrated that 50% of CTPA showed either minor or major motion artefact, while 50% showed no significant motion artefact. For 2% with minor motion, a clinical reason for why this was unavoidable was provided. Therefore 52% of studies met the proposed local standards. In total, 45% of CTPA were assessed to have minor motion and 5% had major motion artefact (non-diagnostic). 18% of CTPA were positive for PE. Following implementation of changes to practice, repeat data collection demonstrated that 67% of CTPA showed no significant motion artefact. 3% with minor motion provided a clinical reason why this was unavoidable. Therefore 70% of studies met the proposed standard. The increase in compliance with local standards was statistically significant (p=0.00906).
Conclusion: Our interventions improved compliance with local standards from 52% to 70%. We recommend rehearsal of breath-holding with patients before CTPA scans as a quick and easy way to improve the diagnostic quality of scans. A prompting phrase within the CTPA scanning protocol has proven effective.
References
Hayes SA, Soff GA, Zabor EC, Moskowitz CS, Liu CC, Ginsberg MS. Clinical consequences of an indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram in cancer patients. Clinical Imaging. 2014 Sept;38(5):637–40. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.04.015
Schönfeld T, Seitz P, Krieghoff C, Ponorac S, Wötzel A, Olthoff S, et al. High-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with ultra-low contrast medium volume for the detection of pulmonary embolism: A comparison with standard CTPA. European Radiology. 2023 Sept 1;34(3):1921–31. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10101-8
Li YJ, Lau KK, Ardley N, Lau T. Efficacy of ‘breath holding at ease’ during ct pulmonary angiography in the improvement of contrast enhancement in pulmonary arteries. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2013 Mar 4;57(4):415–22. doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12039
Dasegowda G, Bizzo BC, Kaviani P, Karout L, Ebrahimian S, Digumarthy SR, et al. Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm. Diagnostics. 2023 Feb 18;13(4):778. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13040778
Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, Gefter WB, Gottschalk A, Mayo JR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: A statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):315–29. doi:10.1148/radiol.2452070397
Jones SE, Wittram C. The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: Imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):329–37. doi:10.1148/radiol.2371041520
Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. RadioGraphics. 2004;24(6):1679–91. doi: 10.1148/rg.246045065.
Varchetta F, Cosson P, Widdowfield M, Danzi R, Orlando G, Natale M, et al. Chest CT in patients with shortness of breath: Comparing high pitch CT and conventional CT on respiratory artefacts and dose. Radiography. 2021 Aug;27(3):908–14. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.02.013
Lichtenstein MJ. Hearing and visual impairments. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 1992 Feb;8(1):173–82. doi:10.1016/s0749-0690(18)30505-6
Zhang J, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, Araoz PA, Williamson EE, Primak AN, et al. Analysis of heart rate and heart rate variation during cardiac CT Examinations. Academic Radiology. 2008 Jan;15(1):40–8. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.023
Ardley ND, Lau KK, Buchan K, Paul E and Troupis JM. Effects of electrocardiogram gating on CT pulmonary angiography image quality. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2014;58(3):303-311. Doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12147
Cantarinha A, Bassil C, Savignac A, Devilder M, Maxwell F, Creze M, et al. “Triple low” free-breathing CTPA protocol for patients with dysnoea. Clinical Radiology. 2022 Aug;77(8):e628-e635. Doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.05.007
Bunch PM, Fulwadhva UP, Wortman JR, Primak AN, Madan R, Steigner ML, et al. Motion artefact reduction from high-pitch dual-source computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2018 Jul/Aug;42(4):623-629. Doi: 0.1097/RCT.0000000000000736
Bauer RW, Schell B, Beeres M, Wichmann JL, Bodelle B, Vogl TJ, et al. High-pitch dual-source computed tomography pulmonary angiography in freely breathing patients. Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 2012 Nov;27(6):376-381. Doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318250067e
Ajlan AM, Binzaqr S, Jadkarim DA, Jamjoom LG and Leipsic J. High-pitch helical dual-source computed tomography pulmonary angiography: comparing image quality in inspiratory breath-hold and during free-breathing. Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 2016 Jn:31(1): 56-62. Doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000173
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jin Kai Soh, Natalia Roszkowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
