A Scoping Review of Practitioner Research on Sensitive Topics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.3594Keywords:
practitioner research, qualitative research, sensitive topics, social work research, social workAbstract
Practitioner research, which involves professionals such as social workers, educators, and nurses, is an approach that may help establish contact with hard-to-reach targets while also exposing the researcher to potentially sensitive and ethically challenging situations and dilemmas. Through a scoping review of the scholarly literature, this paper explores evidence of the effects that research on sensitive topics may have on the researcher and how the researcher can prepare for this. Twenty-four peer-reviewed articles were analysed using thematic analysis, which provided the following four themes: researcher competency, researcher vulnerability, researcher role, and participant vulnerability. In addition, peer support, formal support measures, and research and time management were found to potentially counteract the adverse effects of conducting qualitative research on sensitive topics. The findings of this scoping review strongly suggest that practitioner researchers investigating sensitive issues should partner with professional research institutions from the beginning of the research process to end. In addition, strengthening the research methodology used during the bachelor’s degree educations of professionals such as social workers might help to develop more resilient practitioner researchers. This must, however, be weighed against other necessary courses.
References
Ashton, S. (2014). Researcher or nurse? Difficulties of undertaking semistructured interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 22(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.27.e1255
Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 67(6), 436-440. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406
Bashir, N. (2018). Doing research in peoples' homes: Fieldwork, ethics and safety - on the practical challenges of researching and representing life on the margins. Qualitative Research, 18(6), 638-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117731808
Baum, A. (1990). Stress, intrusive imagery, and chronic distress. Health Psychology, 6, 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.9.6.653
Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., & Hughes, C. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-42
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, J. (1996). Police research: Some critical issues. In F. Leishman, B. Loveday, & S. P. Savage (Eds.), Core issues in policing. Longman.
Bryan, H., & Burstow, B. (2018). Understanding ethics in school-based research. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1361464
Caspersen, J. (2017, November 28). Kan akademiseringen av sykepleiefaget ha gått på bekostning av yrkesrelevansen? Fagbladet. Retrieved from https://fagbladet.no/meninger/kan-akademiseringen-av-sykepleiefaget-hagatt-pa-bekostning-av-yrkesrelevansen-6.115.498574.cb270186ce
Clancy, A. (2011). An embodied response: Ethics and the nurse researcher. Nursing Ethics, 18(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010385531
Coles, J., Astbury, J., Dartnall, E., & Limjerwala, S. (2014). A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers' responses to investigating sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520578
Coy, M. (2006). This morning I'm a researcher, this afternoon I'm an outreach worker: Ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570601076785
Davis, H. (2000). The management of self: Practical and emotional implications of ethnographic work in a public hospital setting. In K. R. Gilbert (Ed.), The Emotional Nature of Qualitative Research (pp. 37-59). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039283.ch3
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 853-871.https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287526
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307309007
Drake, P., & Heath, L. (2010). Practitioner research at doctoral level: Developing coherent research methodologies (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841006
Ellis, N., & Loughland, T. (2016). The challenges of practitioner research: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 112-136. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.8
Elmir, R., Schmied, V., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2011). Interviewing people about potentially sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 19(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.10.19.1.12.c8766
Flanagan, P. (2012). Ethical review and reflexivity in research of children's sexuality. Sex Education, 12(5), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2011.627731
Flanagan, S. M., & Hancock, B. (2010). Reaching the hard to reach - lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community sector): A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-92
Fraser, D. M. (2007). Ethical dilemmas and practical problems for the practitioner researcher. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200014
Gabriel, L., James, H., Cronin-Davids, J., Tizro, Z., Beetham, T., Hullock, A., & Raynar, A. (2017). Reflexive research with mothers and children. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12117
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflectivity and ethically important moments. Research in Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
Harvey, D., Plummer, D., Pighills, A., & Pain, T. (2013). Practitioner research capacity: A survey of social workers in Northern Queensland. Australian Social Work, 66(4), 540-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2012.754916
Hassan, N. (2016). Surviving research on sensitive topics with young offenders. Scottish Journal of Residential Child Care, 15(1), 102-114. Hewitt, J. (2007). Ethical components of researcher-researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308305
Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling (20th anniversary ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520930414
Hoydal, M. (2018, June 7). Social policy and welfare. Nordic Co-operation. https://www.norden.org/en/information/social-policy-and-welfare.
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R.A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.
Kirkevold, M., & Bergland, Å. (2007). The quality of qualitative data: Issues to consider when interviewing participants who have difficulties providing detailed accounts of their experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 2(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620701259273
Levin, I. (2004). Hva er sosialt arbeid. Universitetsforlaget.
Lunt, N., & Fouché, C. (2010). Practitioner research, ethics and research governance. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.516117
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 2(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
McCosker, H., Barnard, A., & Gerber, R. (2001). Undertaking sensitive research: Issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), 1-15
Meghan, M. M. (2019). Action research and systematic, intentional change in teaching practice. Review of Research in Education, 43, 163-196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821132
Mitchell, F., Lunt, N., & Shaw, I. (2010). Practitioner research in social work: A knowledge review. Evidence & Policy, 6(1), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X482971
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Murphy, F., & Nightingale, A. (2002). Accident and emergency nurses as researchers: Exploring some of the ethical issues when researching sensitive topics. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 10, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1054/aaen.2001.0342
National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. (2016). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, humanities, law and theology. Oslo: NESH.
Normann, T. M., Rønning, E., & Nørgaard, E. (2014). Challenges to the Nordic welfare state- comparable indicators (2nd ed.). Nordic Social-Statistical Committee (NOSOSCO).
Pain, H. (2011). Practice research: What it is and its place in the social work profession. European Journal of Social Work, 14(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.490062
Parsons, T. (1969). Research with human subjects and the 'professional complex'. Daedalus, 98(2), 325-360.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1208.
Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
Pool, J., Akhlaghpour, S., Fatehi, F., & Burton-Jones, A. (2019, July). Causes and impacts of Personal Health Information (PHI) breaches: A scoping review and thematic analysis [Conference presentation]. 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Xi'an, China.
Rambøll Management Consulting. (2012). Evaluering af Pædagoguddannelsen (p. 71). Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser.
Riese, J. (2019). What is 'access' in the context of qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 19(6), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118787713
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Shaw, I., & Lunt, N. (2018). Forms of practitioner research. British Journal of Social Work, 48(1), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx024
Sivenbring, J. & Malmros, R. A. (2020). Mixing logics: Multiagency approaches for countering violent extremism. Segerstedtinstitutet.
Stenberg, M., Mangrio, E., Bengtsson, M., & Carlson, E. (2018). Formative peer assessment in healthcare education programmes: Protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025055
Sydor, A. (2013). Conducting research into hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Nurse Researcher, 20(3), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.01.20.3.33.c9495
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Thompson, A. R., & Russo, K. (2012). Ethical dilemmas for clinical psychologists in conducting qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.630636
Tietze, S. (2012). Researching your own organization. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 53-71). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435620.n4
Vaswani, N. (2018). Learning from failure: Are practitioner researchers the answer when conducting research on sensitive topics with vulnerable children and young people? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(4), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1434866
Volker, D. L. (2004). Methodological issues associated with studying an illegal act. Advances in Nursing, 27(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200404000-00005
Wilson, S., Draper, H., & Ives, J. (2008). Ethical issues regarding recruitment to research studies within the primary care consultation. Family Practice, 25(6), 456-461. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn076
Yousif, M., & Passo, K. (2016). IT agility research review: Thematic analysis and categorization of literature (Proceedings No. 205). PACIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/205/
Published
Versions
- 2021-01-27 (4)
- 2021-01-17 (3)
- 2020-12-20 (2)
- 2020-12-20 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Håvard Haugstvedt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
