From the ‘what, so what, now what’ to the ‘what works, for who and why?’
EDITORIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.6136Keywords:
EditorialAbstract
References
Sanderud A. Publication activities among the radiography sector in Norway. Radiography Open. 2014;1:4. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.1201
Fridell K, Ekberg J. Looking into the crystal ball – Swedish radiology 2025. A qualitative study of possible future scenarios. Radiography Open. 2015;2:15–29. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.1527
Meincke L, Dimitar IR, Eriksen R, Lauridsen CA. MR imaging of scaphoid fractures. Fat-saturated T2-weighted and Short tau inversion recovery images. Radiography Open. 2017;3:11. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.2150
Singh VH, Pradhan H. Neonatal chest radiography - Comparing image quality and dose for contact-techniques vs. under-tray techniques. Radiography Open. 2015;2:65–82. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.1530
Guðjónsdóttir J. The unnecessary dose behind cropped radiographs. Radiography Open. 2019;5:10. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.3611
Chanderballi R. Medical Imaging in Guyana, development and status. Radiography Open. 2019;5:12. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.3610
Konstantinidis K, Apostolakis I. Investigation of RIS/PACS Information Systems’ Incorporation in Greek Public Hospitals. Radiography Open. 2020;6:32–44. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4007
Ding S, Weber N, Oppliger A. Microorganism identification and environmental cleaning effectiveness in radiology settings: cross-sectional and experimental studies. Radiography Open. 2020;6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.3647
Ayapaneni DR, Srikonda S, Nerella KT, Reddy LP. Anatomical variations of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Radiography Open. 2021;7:54–60. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4490
Muñoz C, Silencio A, Larico I. Analysis of the iodine distribution map in patients with diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Initial results. Radiography Open. 2021;7:21–33. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4491
Celi Simbaña SS, Andrade Mora DS, Mendoza Benalcázar JE. Accessory spleen. A diagnostic challenge. Case Study. Radiography Open. 2022;8:70–5. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5113
Udaka T, Nishiyama T, Ohtsuka T, Watanabe N, Endou I, Yoshida O, et al. Transomental hernias: Multi-detector row computed tomography findings in 15 clinical cases. Radiography Open. 2022;8:61–9. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5178
Khan A, Lockwood P. Pre-registration UK diagnostic radiography student ability and confidence in interpretation of chest X-rays. Radiography Open. 2021;7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4529
Fiagbedzi E, Gorleku PN, Nyarko S, Frimpong B, Adjei A, Nkrumah A. Perception of final year radiography students towards the proposed six-year Doctor of Radiography/Medical Imaging program. Radiography Open. 2022;8:51–60. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4758
Gbande P, Tchaou M, Dagbe M, Bode Atcha M, Sonhaye L, Agoda-Koussema LK, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary computed tomography angiography protocols: A multicenter audit in Togo. Radiography Open. 2023;9:60–75. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5571
Skalmerås MM, Ellingbø E, Rusandu A. Valg av modalitet ved karundersøkelser: CTA vs. MRA. Radiography Open. 2021;7:34–53. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4605
Anjan Dangal, Maharjan S. Clinical audit of computed tomography requisition form in a himalayan country, Nepal. Radiography Open. 2023;9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.5155
Zarb F. Radiographer education, research, and practice (RERP): 2021-2031. European Federation of Radiographer Societies [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Dec 12];1–17. Available from: https://api.efrs.eu/api/assets/posts/275
Saunders M. Research methods for business students. Person Education Limited. 2009;
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Bmj. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 1996. p. 71–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Abrantes A, Ribeiro LP V, da Silva CA, England A, Azevedo KB, Almeida RPP, et al. Evidence-based radiography: a new methodology or the systematisation of an old practice? Radiography. 2020;26:127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.010
Al Balushi H, Watts H, Akudjedu TN. Research and evidence-based practice in clinical radiography: A systematic review of barriers and recommendations for a new direction. Radiography. 2024;30:538–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.012
Di Michele L, Thomson K, McEntee MF, Kenny B, Reed W. Knowledge translation: Radiographers compared to other healthcare professionals. Radiography. 2020;26:S27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.007
Hafslund B, Clare J, Graverholt B, Wammen Nortvedt M. Evidence-based radiography. Radiography. 2008;14:343–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2008.01.003
Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. The lancet. 2003;362:1225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14546-1
French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science. 2012;7:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-38
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12-3.
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging. Medical Decision Making. 1991;11:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9101100203
Gazelle GS, Kessler L, Lee DW, McGinn T, Menzin J, Neumann PJ, et al. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Radiology. 2011;261:692–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110155
Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Haynes RB, Drummond M. A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies. CMAJ. 1986;134:587–94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1490902/
Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025
Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to Implementation Science. Implementation Science. 2006;1:1. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
Palm R, Hochmuth A. What works, for whom and under what circumstances? Using realist methodology to evaluate complex interventions in nursing: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;109:103601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103601
Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3
Kaplan HC, Walsh KE. Context in implementation science. Pediatrics. 2022;149. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-045948c
Drennan D. Transforming company culture: Getting your company from where you are now to where you want to be. 1st ed. London: McGraw-Hill; 1992.
Rycroft-Malone J. The PARIHS Framework—A Framework for Guiding the Implementation of Evidence-based Practice. J Nurs Care Qual. 2004;19:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-200410000-00002
Bergström A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh AC, Graham ID, Gustafsson K, Harvey G, et al. The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice—a citation analysis of the literature. Implementation Science. 2020;15:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01003-0
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
McCormack B, McCarthy G, Wright J, Coffey A, Slater P. Development of the Context Assessment index (CAI). [Internet]. Ulster; 2008. Available from: https://www.ualberta.ca/nursing/media-library/knowledge-utilization-studies-program/knowledge-utilization-colloquia/kt08/2008caifinalreport.pdf
Wilson V, Dewing J, Cardiff S, Mekki TE, Øye C, McCance T. A person-centred observational tool: devising the Workplace Culture Critical Analysis Tool®. International Practice Development Journal. 2020;10:1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.101.003
Hersey P, Blanchard KH. Management of Organizational Behavior. Academy of Management Journal. 1969;12:526–526.
Foundation of Nursing Studies. Situational Facilitation Matrix [Internet]. Activity-2-Situational-Facilitation-Matrix. 2010 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.fons.org/resources/documents/Creating-Caring-Cultures/Activity-2-Situational-Facilitation-Matrix.pdf
Foundation of Nursing Studies. Situational Facilitation 8-10 characteristics [Internet]. Activity-1-Situational-Facilitation-Characteristics. 2015 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://www.fons.org/resources/documents/Creating-Caring-Cultures/Activity-1-Situational-Facilitation-Characteristics-Sheet-.pdf
Harvey G, Loftus-Hills A, Rycroft-Malone J, Titchen A, Kitson A, McCormack B, et al. Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37:577–88. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02126.x
Shaw T, Dewing J, Young R, Devlin M, Boomer C, Legius M. Enabling Practice Development: Delving into the concept of facilitation from a practitioner perspective. In: Manley K, McCormack B, Wilson V, editors. International Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008 [cited 2023 Aug 29]. p. 147–69. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781444319491
Titchen A, Dewing J, Manley K. Getting Going with Facilitation Skills in Practice Development. In: McCormack B, Manley K, Titchen A, editors. Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 109–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paul Lockwood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).