Erfaring med bruk av video i praksisundervisningen for radiografstudenter
ved OsloMet- Storbyuniversitetet.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4623Emneord (Nøkkelord):
radiography, blended learning, video, rX-ray proceduresSammendrag
Sammendrag
Artikkelen beskriver erfaringer med utvikling og gjennomføring av et seminar i praksisundervisningen for 1.års studenter ved bachelorstudiet i Radiografi ved OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet. Hensikten var å få studentene til å systematisere teoretisk og praktisk kunnskap knyttet til prosedyren for røntgen thorax. Studentene vurderte først gruppevis en video av prosedyren relatert til læringsutbyttene i emnet, og diskuterte den så i plenum. Studentenes opplevelser av undervisningsformen ble innhentet i en kvalitativ, elektronisk spørreundersøkelse. Seminaret ble oppfattet som lærerikt og skapte fruktbare diskusjoner og refleksjon. Dette gjaldt særlig de studentene som allerede hadde gjennomført praksis og hadde tilegnet seg egne erfaringer. Struktur og samarbeid i grupper og i plenum opplevdes som viktig for resultatet. Resultater fra evaluering av undervisningen kan tyde på at video av røntgenprosedyrer har gunstig betydning for studentenes fagforståelse i praksisundervisningen når den benyttes i en studentaktiv læringssituasjon.
Referanser
Forskrift om nasjonal retningslinje for radiografutdanning [Internet]. Lovdata.no. [cited 2021 Dec 29]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2019-03-15-415
Solvoll BA, Heggen K. Læring i sykepleiepraksis, in: Bjerknes MS, Bjørk IT. Å lære i praksis: en veiviser for studenten. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget. 2003.
Heggen K. Profesjon og identitet. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2008.
Riksrevisjonen. Undersøkelse av effektivitet i sykehus. Riksrevisjonens kontroll med forvaltningen av statlige selskaper for 2016 [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://riksrevisjonen.no/rapporter-mappe/no-2017-2018/undersokelse-aveffektivitet-i-sykehus/
Kultur for kvalitet i høyere utdanning. Meld. St. 16. (2016-2017). Kunnskapsdepartementet. [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/aee30e4b7d3241d5bd89db69fe38f7ba/no/pdfs/stm201620170016000dddpdfs.pdf
Utdanningsdirektoratet. Digitale ferdigheter som grunnleggende ferdighet [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/grunnleggendeferdigheter/digitale-ferdigheter-rammeverk/
Imsen G. Elevens verden. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2008.
Vygotsky LS. Interaction between learning and developement. In: Mind in society [Internet]. 1978 [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: https://innovation.umn.edu/igdi/wp-content/uploads/sites/37/2018/08/Interaction_Between_Learning_and_Development.pdf
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc; 1986.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective . I M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (red.), Handbook of self-regulation (s. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
De Boer J. Learning from video: viewing behavior of students. Groningen: Universiteit Groningen, 2013. 160 p.
Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ [Internet]. 1998;5(1):7–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res [Internet]. 2007;77(1):81–112. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Säljö R, Moen S. Læring i praksis. Et sosiokulturelt perspektiv. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk forlag. 2001.10. Opplag 2013.
Sawyer J, Obeid R. Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: Getting the Best of Both Words. In: How we teach now: the GSTA guide to student-centered teaching. In: Publisher: Society of the Teaching of Psychology Editors: Rita Obeid. Anna Schwartz, Christina Shane-Simpson, Patricia J. Brooks: Chapter 12; 2017.
Lyngsnes K, Rismark M. Didaktisk arbeid. (3.utgave). Oslo: Gyldendal. 2014.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ [Internet]. 2004;93(3):223–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Barkley E. Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
Coates H. Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
Hockings C, Cooke S, Yamashita H, McGinty S, Bowl M. Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Res Pap Educ [Internet]. 2008;23(2):191–201. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267152080204872
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res [Internet]. 1989;18(1):32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176008
Prawat RS. The value of ideas: The immersion approach to the development of thinking. Educ Res [Internet]. 1991;20(2):3–30. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189x020002003
Jaques D. Team based learning / learning in groups: a handbook for improving group work. 3. utg. London: Kogan Page. 2002.
Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA. Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 2014;25(3 & 4):85–118.
Sawyer J, Obeid R. Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: Getting the Best of Both Words. In: How we teach now: the GSTA guide to student-centered teaching. In: Publisher: Society of the Teaching of Psychology Editors: Rita Obeid. Anna Schwartz, Christina Shane-Simpson, Patricia J. Brooks: Chapter 12; 2017
Seely Brown J, Collins A, Duguid, P. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Jan. - Feb., 1989), pp. 32-42. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013189X%28198901%2F02%2918%3A1%3C32%3ASCATCO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2
Lage M, Platt G, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment source. The Journal of Economic Education. 2000;31(1):30–43.
Bishop J, Verleger M. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. ASEE Conferences; 2020.
Bergmann J, Sams A. Remixing chemistry class: Two Colorado teachers make vodcasts of their lectures to free up class time for hands-on activities. Learning & Leading with Technology. 2009;36(4):22–7.
Pierce R, Fox J. Instructional design and assessment: Vodcasts and active learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2012;76(10):1–5.
Pluta WJ, Richards BF, Mutnick A. PBL and beyond: trends in collaborative learning. Teach Learn Med [Internet]. 2013;25 Suppl 1(sup1):S9-16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.842917
Terum, LI, Smeby JC. Akademisering, kvalitet og relevans: Debatten om utdanningene til velferdsstatens profesjoner. In Frølich N, Hovdhaugen E, Terum LI. (Eds.), Kvalitet, kapasitet og relevans: Utviklingstrekk i norsk høyere utdanning (pp. 114-143). Oslo: Cappelen Damm. 2014.
Smeby JC, Heggen K. Coherence and the development of professional knowledge and skills. J Educ Work [Internet]. 2014;27(1):71–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.718749
Hatlevik IKR. Havnes A. Perspektiver på læring i profesjonsutdanninger – fruktbare spenninger og meningsfulle sammenhenger. In: Mausethagen IS, Smeby JC (red.), Kvalifisering til profesjonell yrkesutøvelse (s. 191–203). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2017
Norvoll R. Gap mellom utdanning og yrke. Tidsskr Sykepl [Internet]. 2002;90(5):52–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4220/sykepleiens.2002.0013
Heggen K. Kvalifisering for profesjonsutøving: sjukepleiar - lærar - sosialarbeidar, Oslo, Abstrakt forlag; 2010
Hatlevik IKR. The theory-practice relationship: reflective skills and theoretical knowledge as key factors in bridging the gap between theory and practice in initial nursing education: The theory-practice relationship. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2012;68(4):868–77. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05789.x
Kvernbekk T. Filosofisk om teori og praksis. Bedre skole 2. 2011. [Internet]. Utdanningsforskning.no. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://utdanningsforskning.no/artikler/2011/filosofisk-om-teori-og-praksis/
van Oers B. The fallacy of decontextualization. Mind Cult Act [Internet]. 1998;5(2):135–42. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0502_7
Pettersen RC. Kvalitetslæring i høgere utdanning: innføring i problem- og praksisbasert didaktikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2005
Killingberg H, Gjemdal M, Bratås O. Praksisseminar fremmer profesjonsidentitet for sykepleierstudenter. Sykepl Nett [Internet]. 2018;(65158):e-65158. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4220/sykepleiens.2018.65158
Lyngsnes K, Rismark M. Didaktisk arbeid. (3.utgave). Oslo: Gyldendal. 2014.
Pettersen RC. Kvalitetslæring i høgere utdanning: innføring i problem- og praksisbasert didaktikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2005
Preston G, Phillips R, Gosper M, McNeill M, Woo K, Green D. Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australas J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2010;26(6). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1038
Day JA. Investigating learning with web lectures. Georgia Institute of Technology; 2008.
Yousef AMF, Chatti MA, Schroeder U. Video-based learning: A critical analysis of the research published in 2003-2013 and future visions [Internet]. Thinkmind.org. [cited 2021 Dec 7]. Available from: http://www.thinkmind.org/download.php?articleid=elml_2014_5_30_50050
Hurst KM. Using video podcasting to enhance the learning of clinical skills: A qualitative study of physiotherapy students’ experiences. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2016;45:206–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.011
Lee N-J, Chae S-M, Kim H, Lee J-H, Min HJ, Park D-E. Mobile-based video learning outcomes in clinical nursing skill education: A randomized controlled trial: A randomized controlled trial. Comput Inform Nurs [Internet]. 2016;34(1):8–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000183
Stone R, Cooke M, Mitchell M. Undergraduate nursing students’ use of video technology in developing confidence in clinical skills for practice: A systematic integrative literature review. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2020;84(104230):104230. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104230
van der Meij H. Reviews in instructional video. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2017;114:164–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.002
Holland, A., Smith, F., McCrossan, G., Adamson, E., Watt, S. & Penny, K. (2013). Online video in clinical skills education of oral medication administration for undergraduate student nurses: a mixed methods prospective cohort study. Nurse Education Today, 33(6), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.006
Kelly, M., Lyng, C., McGrath, M. & Cannon, G. (2009). A multi-method study to determine the effectiveness of, and student attitudes to, online instructional videos for teaching clinical nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.09.004
Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2013;33(12):1576–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.013
Frederiksen, M., Gundelach, P. & Nielsen, R. S. (2014). Mixed methods-forskning: principper og praksis. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag
Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. J Mix Methods Res [Internet]. 2007;1(1):8–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689806290531
Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2010
Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health [Internet]. 2012;40(8):795–805. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2021 Linda Hammerstrøm, Tone Strømme Johannesen
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
