Contagious Sapiosexuality: Dreaming Conference Seduction as Ethics of Qualitative Research

Jennifer R.  Wolgemuth; Travis M. Marn

doi:10.7577/rerm.4928

Authors

Jennifer R. Wolgemuth United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-2239
Travis M. Marn https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-2882

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4928

Keywords:

academic conferences, Baudrillard, ethics seduction, qualitative research

Abstract

In this paper we engage Baudrillard’s (1979/1990) writings on seduction to ‘dream up’ seduction as an ethical and generative-destructive force of qualitative research. Beginning with a dreamy conference seduction, we argue that seduction keeps us qualitative researchers thinking, moving, risking, and being passionate about our work and each other. As a playful, sometimes frivolous, yet deeply terrifying process, seduction moves us beyond ourselves and into theoretical unknowns; enables us to risk ourselves in ethically listening to others’ truths. We show and argue that conferences can be ripe spaces for the spread of contagious sapiosexuality and urge qualitative researchers to experiment and play with conference seductions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arndt S., & Tesar M. (2019). Reconfiguring narrative methodologies: Thresholds of realities in post-qualitative methodologies. In: Farquhar S., Fitzpatrick E. (Eds.) Innovations in Narrative and Metaphor. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_9

Baudrillard, J. (1979/1990). Seduction. B. Singer (Trans.). St. Martens Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20638-4

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

Baudrillard, J. (2007). Forget Foucault. California: Semiotext.

Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616295

Butler, J. (2002). Bodies and power, revisited. Radical Philosophy, 114, 13-19.

Gibbs, A. (2010). After affect: Sympathy, synchrony, and mimetic communication. In M. Gregg & G.J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader. Duke University. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047-008

Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.

Higgins, M. (2017). Post-qualitative mo(ve)ments: Concluding remarks on methodological response abilities and being wounded by thought. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.2553

Huffer, L. (2010). Mad for Foucault: Rethinking the foundations of queer theory. Columbia University Press.

Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Sage.

Johnson, P. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s ‘different spaces’. History of the Human Sciences, 19(4), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669

Kim, J-H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of research as stories. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802861

Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2010). Validity, responsibility, and aporia. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(8), 603-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410374034

Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802793

Kuntz, A. (2015). The responsible methodologist: Inquiry, truth-telling, and social justice. Left Coast Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315417332

Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788753

Marn, T., & Wolgemuth, J.R. (2017). Purposeful entanglements: A new materialist analysis of transformative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416659085

Massumi, B. (2003). The archive of experience. In J. Brouwer & A. Mulder (Eds.), Information is alive: Art and theory on archiving and retrieving data. Rotterdam: V2 Organisatie/EU European Culture 2000 Program.

Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G.E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative research studies (pp. 3-16). Urbana, IL: NCTE.

Rajchman, J. (1991). Truth and eros: Foucault, Lacan, and the question of ethics. Routledge. Shakespeare, W. (1595/1992). A midsummer night's dream, L. Buckle & P. Kelly (Eds). University of Cambridge.

Ulmer, J. (2017). Food, water, shelter, justice, love: Methodological axes for critical qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 10(4), 378-394. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.378

Van den Hoonaard, W.C. (2012). The seduction of ethics: Transforming the social sciences. University of Toronto. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442694521

Wolgemuth, J.R. (2007). Intellect, Inter(dis)course, and Identity: The production and resistance of

masculinity in graduate education. ProQuest.

Wolgemuth, J.R., & Donohue, R. (2006). Toward an inquiry of discomfort: Guiding transformation in emancipatory narrative research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 1012-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406288629

Wolgemuth, J.R., Rautio, P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Marn, T., Nordstrom, S., & Clark, A. (2018). Work/think/play/birth/terror/death/qualitative/research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 712-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417735860

Žižek, S. (2005). With or without passion: What’s wrong with fundamentalism, Part I. Retrieved 28 February, 2018 from http://www.lacan.com/zizpassion.htm