Fact-checking as digital media literacy in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4689Keywords:
fact checking, digital media literacy, higher education, media educationAbstract
Information disorder is a growing phenomenon, and fact-checking has long been recognized as an effective practice to evaluate media. Still, knowledge about fact-checking is not coherent in higher education institutions, not even in the field of media education. The paper is based on two case studies exploring the teaching of fact-checking in higher education as a European survey and evaluation of a workshop online in the critical-pragmatic framework with mixed methods. Findings highlight a need for developing fact-checking teaching in higher education as digital media literacy. Digital media literacy shows out as linkages to algorithm-based communication and, hands-on educational practices developing mindsets of master students instead of more traditional teaching as the mainstream in the survey. Even media studies mostly seem to have teaching on fact checking, there is a lack of learning materials, game-based educational approach, and integration fact-checking-related subjects (e.g., propaganda, disinformation) in educational sciences together with broadening the field of media education in higher education in Europe and beyond.
References
Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Beaudreau, J. & Frau-Miegs, D. (2021). Executive Summary: Introducing fact-checking in the curriculum at university level. In D. Frau-Miegs & J. Beaudreau (Eds.), Mapping Fact Checking and Disinformation in Europe. Erasmus + Fact Checking Project (pp. 3–11). Unpublished report. Paris: University of Sorbonne-Nouvelle.
Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy. What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-03
Carlsson, U. (ed.) (2018). Medie- och informationskunnighet i den digitala tidsåldern: En demokratifråga. Kartläggning, analys och reflektioner. [Media and Information Literacy in the Digital Age: A Question of Democracy]. Göteborg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
Carlsson, U. (2021) Foreword. In Frau-Meigs, D., Kotilainen, S., Pathak-Shelat, M., Hoechsmann, M., Poyntz, S. (eds.) The Handbook on Media Education Research (pp. xi-xviii). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley Blackwell.
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The Case Study Approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11(100). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
European Commission. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/final-report-high-level-expert-group-fake-newsand-online-disinformation
Ferrari Anusca, 2013. A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe.
Hobbs, R. (2017a). Create to learn: introduction to digital literacy. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley Blackwell.
Hobbs, R. (2017b). Teaching and Learning in a Post-Truth World, Citizens in the Making. Educational Leadership, 75(3), 26–31.
Hobbs, R. (2020). Media literacy in action: Questioning the media. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0063
Hobbs, R., Kanižaj, I. & Pereira, L. (2019). Digital Literacy and Propaganda. Media Studies, 10(19), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0144
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. In: Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 559-603.
Kreissl, K. & al. (2015). ‘Will Gender Equality Ever Fit in? Contested Discursive Spaces of University Reform.’ Gender and Education, 27(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1028903
Kotilainen, S., Okkonen, J., Vuorio, J., Leisti, K. (2020): “Youth Media Education in the Age of Algorithm‐Driven Social Media, In Frau-Meigs, D., Kotilainen, S., Pathak-Shelat, S., Hoechsmann, M., Poyntz, S. R. (eds.) The Handbook of Media Education Research, pp. 131-140, Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166900.ch10
Lanskhear, C., Knobel, M. (2015) ‘Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education.’ Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2006-2016, 8 – 20. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-02
Miller, I (2020). ‘Research Guides: Journalism: Fact-Checking Sites’. Eastern Washington University. Retrieved 17 December 2020.
Ponce, O.A. & Pagan-Maldonado, N. (2015). Mixed Methods Research in Education:
Capturing the Complexity of the Profession. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(1), 111–135.
Rasi, P., Ruokamo, H. & Maasilta, M. (2017). Towards a Culturally Inclusive, Integrated and Transdisciplinary Media Education Curriculum: Case Study of an International MA Program at the University of Lapland. Journal of Media Literacy Education 9(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2017-9-1-3
Rautiainen, M. (Ed.) (2019). Towards a better democracy: Council of Europe's competences for democratic culture in education and teaching. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/63745/978-951-39-7734-4.pdf
Seroen, J-D. (2019). European cooperation project on disinformation and fact checking training. Empowering current and future media and education professionals, to identify, prevent, and combat fake news spread over digital networks. ERASMUS+ KA2 project. Lisbon: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Sefton-Green J, Nixon, H., Erstad, O. (2009) ’Reviewing approaches and perspectives on "digital literacy".’ Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800902741556
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368246.001.0001
Stein, S., Andreotti, V. Bruce, J. & Suša, R. (2016). ‘Towards Different Conversations about the Internationalization of Higher Education.’ Comparative and International Education/Éducation comparée et international, 45(1), art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v45i1.9281
Tandoc Jr., E.C. & Zheng, W.L. & Ling, R. (2017). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 7(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Teichler, U. (2009). ‘Internationalisation of Higher Education: European Experiences.’ Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9002-7
Tekoniemi, S. (2021). Fact-checking Meets with Media Education: Evaluating A Workshop in Higher Education. Master Thesis in Digital Literacy Education. Tampere University, Finland. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:tuni-202106075736
Valtonen, T., Tedre, M., Mäkitalo, K., Vartiainen, H. (2019). Media Literacy education in the age of machine learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 11(2), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2019-11-2-2
Wardle, C. & Derakshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe report. DGI(2017)09.
VanderStoep, S. W., & Johnston, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life : Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sirkku Kotilainen, Siling Tekoniemi, Mari Maasilta, Kirsti Lempiäinen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.