Experiences of technostressors during the Covid-19 pandemic among Finnish comprehensive school teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5257

Keywords:

ICT, education, Covid-19, technostress

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic caused significant changes to teachers’ work, including a rapid switch to remote teaching. This increased the role of ICT in teachers’ work and made teachers susceptible to technostress. In this study, we aimed to identify ICT-related stressors (i.e., technostressors) in comprehensive school teachers’ work in Finland during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data, consisting of answers to two open-ended questions, were gathered as part of a questionnaire (n=361), and qualitative content analysis was applied. Based on the analysis, technostressors were divided into five categories: rapid ICT adoption, technological inadequacies, ICT-related pedagogical challenges, limitations in social interaction, and multichannel communication and availability pressure. The findings indicate that schools were not prepared for the pandemic-induced online teaching, which showed in inadequate resources and support for teachers. Moving forward, schools could reduce technostressors by, for example, organizing technical and pedagogical support, developing shared practices to decrease the digital communication load and availability pressure, and fostering interaction and collaboration in online environments.

Author Biographies

Laura Bordi, Tampere University

Researcher, Faculty of Management and Business

Sanna Nuutinen, Tampere University

Researcher, Faculty of Management and Business

References

Alasoini, T., Ala-Laurinaho, A., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Seppänen, L. (2022). Työelämän digikuilujen yli: digitalisaatio kaikkien kaveriksi. Helsinki: Työterveyslaitos. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-261-997-6

Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004

Andrade, C., & Petiz Lousã, E. (2021). Telework and work–family conflict during COVID-19 lockdown in Portugal: The influence of job-related factors. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030103

Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963

Borle, P., Reichel, K., Niebuhr, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2021). How are techno-stressors associated with mental health and work outcomes? A systematic review of occupational exposure to information and communication technologies within the technostress model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8673. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168673

Califf, C.B., & Brooks, S. (2020). An empirical study of techno-stressors, literacy facilitation, burnout, and turnover intention as experienced by K-12 teachers. Computers & Education, 157, 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103971

Chou, H.L., & Chou, C. (2021). A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers’ technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching. Computers & Education, 175, 104335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104335

Çoklar, A., Efilti, E., Şahin, Y., & Akçay, A. (2016). Determining the reasons of technostress experienced by teachers: A qualitative study. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.96082

Day, A., Paquet, S., Scott, N., & Hambley, L. (2012). Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029837

Day, A., Barber, L., & Tonet, J. (2019). Information communication technology and employee well-being: Understanding the “iParadox Triad” at work. In R.N. Landers (Ed.) The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior, 580–607. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649636.022

Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C.S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Research 29, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Hatlevik, I.K.R., & Hatlevik, O.E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935

Hsien, H.F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Joo, Y.J., Lim, K.Y., & Kim, N.H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004

Kaarakainen, M.-T. & Saikkonen, L. (2021). Multilevel analysis of the educational use of technology: Quantity and versatility of digital technology usage in Finnish basic education schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12534

Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165

Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0ew7-01wb-bkhl-qdyv

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D.J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650

Lavonen, J. & Salmela-Aro, K. 2022. Experiences of moving quickly to distance teaching and learning at all levels of education in Finland. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.) Primary and Secondary education during Covid-19. Disruptions to educational opportunity during a pandemic (pp. 105–123). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81500-4_4

Lee, M., & Lim, K.Y. (2020). Do the technostress creators predict job satisfaction and teacher efficacy of primary school teachers in Korea? Educational Technology International, 21(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.23095/ETI.2020.21.1.069

Lizana, P.A., & Vega-Fernadez, G. (2021). Teacher teleworking during the Covid-19 pandemic: Association between work hours, work–family balance and quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147566

Mäkiniemi, J.P. (2022). Digitalisation and work well-being: A qualitative study of techno-work engagement experiences related to the use of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2021-0276

Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Ahola, S., & Joensuu, J. (2019). How are technology-related workplace resources associated with techno-work engagement among a group of Finnish teachers? Seminar.net, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2919

Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Ahola, S., Syvänen, A., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., & Viteli, J. (2017). Digitalisoituva koulu - hyvinvoivat opettajat? Miten edistää digitalisoitumista ja työhyvinvointia. TRIM Research Reports, 24. Tampere University. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-03-0542-0

Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Ahola, S., & Joensuu, J. (2020). A novel construct to measure employees’ technology-related experiences of well-being: Empirical validation of the Techno-Work Engagement Scale (TechnoWES). Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.79

Park, Y., Liu, Y., & Headrick, L. (2020). When work is wanted after hours: Testing weekly stress of information communication technology demands using boundary theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(6), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2461

Pirkkalainen, H., & Salo, M. (2016). Two decades of the dark side in the information systems basket: suggesting five areas for future research. In ECIS 2016: Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9-11, 2014 (Article 101). European Conference on Information Systems. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/101

Ragu-Nathan, T.S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B.S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460

Salmela-Aro, K., Upadyaya, K., & Hietajärvi, L. (2020). Suomalaisten rehtorien ja opettajien työhyvinvointiprofiilit koronakeväänä. Psykologia, 55(6), 426–443. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/326932

Schildkamp, K., Wopereis, I., Kat-De Jong, M., Peet, A., & Hoetjes, I. (2020). Building blocks of instructor professional development for innovative ICT use during a pandemic. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0034

Siddiqui, S., Arif, I., & Hinduja, P. (2023). Technostress: A catalyst to leave the teaching profession. A survey designed to measure technostress among teachers in Pakistan during COVID-19 pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media, 20(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221107506

Syvänen, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Syrjä, S., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., & Viteli, J. (2016). When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar.net, 12(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2281

Tarafdar, M., Bolman Pullins, E., & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2014). Examining impacts of technostress on the professional salesperson's behavioural performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 34(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2013.870184

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B.S., & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T.S., & Ragu-Nathan, B.S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side: examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C.L. and Stich, J.-F. (2019). The technostress trifecta – techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169

Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/215995/

Özgür, H. (2020). Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: A structural equation modeling. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106468

Downloads

Published

2023-10-10

How to Cite

Bordi, L., & Nuutinen, S. (2023). Experiences of technostressors during the Covid-19 pandemic among Finnish comprehensive school teachers . Seminar.net, 19(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5257

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Laura Bordi, Sanna Nuutinen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY

  • The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
  • The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  • Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.