From black screens to mediating means
A classroom study of Media Literacy 2.0 in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5321Keywords:
Higher education, screens, working life relevance, creative digital literacy activities, Media literacy 2.0, blended learningAbstract
The paper reports on an empirical case study that explores innovative teaching practices in higher education, including digital, physical, and blended learning activities. The study followed the Master’s course ‘Experts in Teamwork’, where the students worked with practical assignments based on real-life challenges formulated by an external collaboration partner, which included actors from the health care department, the school management, and the ICT management in the local municipality. The students also gained experience with creative media production and worked with various digital tools and software.
The findings show that the students experienced the project as motivating, highly educational and relevant to working life. It seems that digital tools contributed to flexibility, particularly for interactivity with the external partners and for group work. Both for students and the teachers the use of screens and software like Zoom and Teams opened for new ways of thinking about collaboration and provided an extended learning space and increased learning potential. However, screens also imply limitations, for example in terms of communication noise, possible passive forms of participation or even withdrawal from some of the students. Moreover, practices that include digital, physical and hybrid learning activities are highly complex, which require that the activities are particularly well planned and thoughtfully organized. The learning situation is therefore characterized by increased demands and expectations - for both students, teachers, and the institutions.
References
Adams, A. E., Randall, S., & Traustadóttir, T. (2015). A tale of two sections: an experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 14(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2008). Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod [Interpretation and Reflection: Philosophy of Science and Qualitative Method]. Studentlitteratur.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Biesta, G., Kwiek, M., Lock, G., Martins, H., Masschelein, J., Papatsiba, V., Simons, M., & Zgaga, P. (2009). What is the Public Role of the University? A Proposal for a Public Research Agenda. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 249-254. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2009.8.2.249
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC.
Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2023). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
de Block, L., & Buckingham, D. (2010). Global children, global media: migration, media and childhood. Palgrave.
Dezuanni, M. (2017). Agentive Realism and Media Literacy. The Journal of Media Literacy, 64(1 & 2), 16-19.
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Gibson, J. J. (1986/2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press.
Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (Vol. 1, pp. 3-21). Wiley.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hathaway, D. M. (2020). "We Always Make It Work": Teachers' Agency in the Time of Crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 239-250.
Hoechsmann, M., & Poyntz, S. R. (2012). Media Literacies. John Wiley & Sons.
Holen, A., & Sortland, B. (2022). The Teamwork Indicator – a feedback inventory for students in active group learning or team projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(2), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1985435
Islam, M. S., Wistrand, K., & Gao, S. (2023). Learners and their learning environment in Swedish higher education: Challenges in computer-mediated learning during COVID-19. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 18(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.18.1.4
Lee, D., Morrone, A. S., & Siering, G. (2018). From swimming pool to collaborative learning studio: Pedagogy, space, and technology in a large active learning classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9550-1
Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 46-55.
NTNU. (2023). Experts in Teamwork (EiT). https://www.ntnu.edu/eit
Otte, P. P. (2016). Integrating Sustainable Development in Higher Education through Experience-based Learning: Insights from Experts in Team (EiT) for Developing a Combined Theoretical Framework. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(1), 131-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408215625550
Powers, K. L., Brooks, P. J., Galazyn, M., & Donnelly, S. (2016). Testing the Efficacy of MyPsychLab to Replace Traditional Instruction in a Hybrid Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(1), 6-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716636514
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1974). The structures of the life-world. Heinemann.
SiKT. (2023). SiKT. SiKT. https://sikt.no/en/home
Sointu, E., Vuojärvi, H., & Äikäs, A. (2022). Students’ perspectives on the functionality of the flipped classroom approach in master’s thesis seminar. Seminar.net, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4672
Svihus, C. L. (2023). Online teaching in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11971-7
Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education - Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797
Verhulst, E., Nilsen, H. R., & Sortland, B. (2023). Engaging and Empowering Students to Contribute to Sustainable Development Through Developing Interdisciplinary Teamwork Skills. In T. Walker, K. Tarabieh, S. Goubran, & G. Machnik-Kekesi (Eds.), Sustainable Practices in Higher Education Finance, Strategy, and Engagemen. Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27807-5
Vold, T., Lervik, M., & Holen, S. (2021). Teacher Motivation During the Corona Crisis, Facing "Black Screens" and Missing "Watercoolers". In (pp. 512-519,XX). Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (Fifth ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Schofield
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.