Healthcare Professionals’ Identification of, and Solutions to, Health Problems for Hard to Reach Patients with Diabetes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6005Abstract
This article examines how healthcare professionals understand children with type 1 diabetes and their families, and how they consider them hard to reach. Based on observations and analysis of healthcare professionals’ case conferences, the article finds that families’ lack of compliance with professional recommendations is explained by parental lack of resources, ability, willingness, and complex social and personal problems of the family members. To find solutions to these diabetes management problems, the professionals integrate and synthesize knowledge based on experience, judgment, and practical skills. They also recognize organizational limitations of the healthcare system and, consequently, dependency on other organizations with other functions and knowledge. The article contributes to new knowledge about how organizations and professionals try to address and solve problems of health inequality in practice. A major finding is that the capacity to address individual health literacy depends just as much on organizational health literacy.
Downloads
References
Akhter, K., Turnbull, T., & Simmons, D. (2016). Influences of social issues on type 1 diabetes self-management: Are we doing enough? Practical Diabetes, 33(9), 307–312a. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.2061
Andersen, N. Å. (2008). Velfærdsledelse: Diagnoser og udfordringer [Welfare management: Diagnoses and challenges]. In C. Sløk, & K. Villadsen (Eds.), Velfærdsledelse [Welfare management] (pp. 33–68). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Polity Press.
Borschuk, A. P., & Everhart, R. S. (2015). Health Disparities among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: A systematic review of the current literature. Families, Systems, & Health, 33(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000134
Burrage, M. (1993). From practice to school-based professional education: Patterns of conflict accommodation in England, France, and the United States. In S. Rothblatt, & B. Wittrock (Eds.), The European and American University since 1800 (pp.142–187). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720925.005
DeWalt, D. A., & Hink, A. (2009). Health literacy and child health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics, 124, S265–S274. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1162B
Garzón-Orjuela, N., Samacá-Samacá, D.F., Luque Angulo, S.C., Mendes Abdala, C.V., Reveiz, L., & Eslava-Schmalbach, J. An overview of reviews on strategies to reduce health inequalities. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19, Article 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01299-w
Gilje, N. (2017). Profesjonskunnskapens elementære former [The Basic forms of professional knowledge]. In S. Mausethagen, & J. I. Smeby (Eds.), Kvalifisering til profesjonell yrkesutøvelse [Qualification for professional practice] (pp.21-33). Universitetsforlaget.
Grimen, H. (2008). Profesjon og kunnskap [Professions and knowledge]. In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Professional studies] (4th ed., pp.71-86). Universitetsforlaget.
Grimen, H., & Molander, A. (2008). Profesjon og skjønn. [Profession and discretion]. In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Professional studies] (4th ed., pp.179-196). Universitetsforlaget.
Hilden, P. K. (2002). Teknologi og kultur—HbA1c, selvbehandling og type 1-diabetes [Technology and culture—HbA1c, self-treatment, and type 1 diabetes]. Tidsskrift for den Norske Legeforening, 122(1), 69–72.
Khorasani, E. C., Sany, S. B. T., Tehrani, H., Doosti, H., & Peyman, N. (2020). Review of organizational health literacy practice at health care centers: Outcomes, barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207544
Kickbusch, I., Pelikan, J. M., Apfel, F., & Tsouros, A. D. (2013). Health literacy: The solid facts. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/128703/e96854.pdf
Kneer, G., & Nassehi, A. (1997). Niklas Luhmann—Introduktion til teorien om sociale systemer. [Niklas Luhmann—Introduction to the theory of social systems](1st ed.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Levin, L., Kichler, J. C., & Polfuss, M. (2013). The relationship between hemoglobin A1C in youth with type 1 diabetes and chaos in the family household. The Diabetes Educator, 39(5), 696–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721713496872
Li, A., & Whyte, M. (2021). Disparities in Diabetes Care. EMJ Diabetes, 9(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/21-00194.
Luhmann, N. (2000). Sociale systemer: Grundrids til en almen teori [Social systems: Outline of a general theory] (1st ed.). Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Maindal, H. T., & Vinther-Jensen, K. (2016). Sundhedskompetence (Health literacy)—Teori, forskning og praksis [Health Literacy—Theory, Research and Practice]. Klinisk Sygepleje,, 30(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1903-2285-2016-01-02
Martin, H. M., & Topholm, E. H. (2020). Sårbarhed og diabetes: En litteraturgennemgang [Vulnerability and diabetes: A literature review]. VIVE-Det Nationale Forsknings- og Analysecenter for Velfærd [The National Research and Analysis Center for Welfare]. https://www.vive.dk/media/pure/14921/4119732
McLaughlin, S., Chaney, D., Belton, A., & Garst, J. (2015). International standards for education of diabetes health professionals. International Diabetes Federation. https://idf.org/media/uploads/2023/05/attachments-34.pdf
Mik-Meyer, N., & Villadsen, K. (2007). Magtens former: Sociologiske perspektiver på statens møde med borgeren (1. udgave) [Forms of power: Sociological perspectives on the encounter between the state and the citizen (1st ed.)]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927076
Molander, A., & Terum, L. I. (2008). Profesjonsstudier—en introduksjon.[Professional studies—An introduction] In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier [Professional studies] (4th ed., pp.13-27). Universitetsforlaget.
Nissen, M.A. (2015). Viden om viden og kvalitet [Knowledge about knowledge and quality]. In M. Harder, & M.A. Nissen (Eds.), Socialt arbejde i en foranderlig verden [Social work in a changing world] (1st ed., pp.119-134). Akademisk Forlag.
Nutbeam, D. (2006). Health Literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259
Petersen, A. R., & Lupton, D. (1996). The new public health: Health and self in the age of risk. Sage Publications.
Sanders, T., Elliott, J., Norman, P., Johnson, B., & Heller, S. (2019). Disruptive illness contexts and liminality in the accounts of young people with type 1 diabetes. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(7), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12906
Shim, J. K. (2010). Cultural health capital: A theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146509361185
Steno Diabetes Center (2020). Initiativbeskrivelse for tilbud om hjemmebesøg til sårbare patienter (børn og unge) og familier [Initiative description for offering home visits to vulnerable patients (children and young people) and families]. Steno Diabetes Center.
Trezona, A., Dodson, S., & Osborne, R. H. (2018). Development of the organisational health literacy responsiveness (Org-HLR) self-assessment tool and process. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 694. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3499-6
Tsiouli, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Stefanaki, C., Darviri, C., & Chrousos, G. P. (2013). Effects of diabetes-related family stress on glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes systematic review. Canadian Family Physician, 59(2), 143–149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3576940/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2024, August 1). History of Health Literacy Definitions. Healthy People 2023. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-people-2030/history-health-literacy-definitions
Van Meerkerk, I., Edelenbos, J., & Williams, P. (2021). Becoming a competent boundary spanning public servant. In H. Sullivan, H. Dickinson, & H. Henderson, (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant (pp. 1437–1452). Palgrave Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_39-1
Walker, A. F., Haller, M. J., Gurka, M. J., Morris, H. L., Bruggeman, B., Miller, K., Foster, N., Zabala, A. C., & Schatz, D. A. (2019). Addressing health disparities in type 1 diabetes through peer mentorship. Pediatric Diabetes, 21(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12935
Ørsted, A. (under preparation). Bedre liv med diabetes—et casestudie om sundhedssystemers og -professionelles muligheder og barrierer for i praksis at løse et problem med social ulighed i sundhed. [Better life with diabetes—A case study of the possibilities and obstacles of healthcare systems and healthcare professionals to practically solve a problem with social inequality within healthcare].
Ørsted, A., & Engen, M. (2025). Hverdagslivet med diabetes hos familier i sårbare livssituationer—Den daglige balancering af ansvaret for selvbehandling [Everyday life with diabetes in families in vulnerable life situations—The daily balance of the responsibility for selfcare]. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund [Journal of Research in Disease and Society], 43, 13–35.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anette Stamer Ørsted, Maria Appel Nissen, Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).