Professionals’ Working Conditions and Turnover Intentions in Norwegian Child Protection Institutions: A Comparison Across Ownership Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6094Abstract
This study compares the working conditions and turnover intentions of professionals in Norwegian residential child protection institutions across public, for‑profit, and non‑profit ownership, using survey data from 870 professionals. Apart from work-family balance, professionals in for‑profit institutions report less favourable conditions across key risk dimensions—notably, weaker collegial support, lower‑quality professional leadership, and greater work pressure. Turnover intentions are significantly higher in for‑profit institutions, which is largely attributed to a more limited scope for professionalism. These findings are discussed in light of institutional theory. In sectors where organisations compete for users, investment in professional expertise may be a strategy to enhance attractiveness. By contrast, in contexts where users are allocated providers, as in residential child protection, competition for public contracts may incentivise cost-cutting, flexible staffing, and selective bids for target groups that place particular demands on staff—dynamics that potentially heighten work pressures while reducing investment in professional competence.
Downloads
References
Alsos, K., Bergene, A. C., Bjøru, E. C., Hippe, J. M., Holte, J. H., Ibenholt, K., & Røtnes, R. (2019). Lønns-, arbeids- og pensjonsvilkår i offentlig og privat barnevern [Wage, work and pensions in public and private child protection]. Fafo.
Astvik, W., Welander, J., & Larsson, R. (2020). Reasons for staying: A longitudinal study of work conditions predicting social workers’ willingness to stay in their organisation. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(5), 1382–1400. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz103
Baldschun, A. (2014). The six dimensions of child welfare employees’ occupational well-being. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 4(4), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v4i4.4708
Bay, A.-H., & Røiseland, A. (Eds.). (2025). Offentlige eller private velferdstjenester: Politiske spenninger og faglige nyanser [Public or private welfare services: Political tensions and professional nuances]. Scandinavian University Press.
Beer, O. W. J., Phillips, R., Letson, M. M., & Wolf, K. G. (2021). Personal and professional impacts of work-related stress alleviation strategies among child welfare workers in child advocacy center settings. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, Article 105904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105904
Bengtsson, M. (2020). Karriär och profession: Om positioner, statushierarki och mobilitet inom socionomyrket [Career and profession: On positions, status hierarchies and mobility within the social work occupation] [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Lund]. Lund University Research Portal. https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/publications/karri%C3%A4r-och-profession-om-positioner-statushierarki-och-mobilitet/
Berlin, J., Szücs, S., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2022). How do street‐level bureaucrats manage high workloads? Collegial mechanisms at the organisational level—Experiences from public healthcare organisations. European Management Review, 19(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12480
Bjøru, E. C., Hippe, J. M., Holte, J. H., Røtnes, R., Trygstad, S., & Bergene, A. C. (2019). Når velferd er til salgs: Ideelle og kommersielle leverandører av velferdstjenester [When welfare is for sale: Non-profit and for-profit providers of welfare services]. Fafo.
Bode, I. (2008). The culture of welfare markets: The international recasting of pension and care systems. Routledge.
Bode, I. (2024). The fate of social modernity: Western Europe and organised welfare provision in challenging times. Edward Elgar.
Bogen, H., & Grønningsæter, A. B. (2014). Kommuners kjøp av private tjenester—eksempler fra barnevern og andre områder. [The municipalities’ purchase of private services]. Fafo.
Brady, J. (2020). Workload, accountability and stress: A comparative study of teachers’ working conditions in state and private schools in England [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge]. Apollo—University of Cambridge Repository. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/308758
Deery, S., Walsh, J., & Guest, D. (2011). Workplace aggression: The effects of harassment on job burnout and turnover intentions. Work, Employment and Society, 25(4), 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011419707
Derber, C. (1983). Ideological proletarization and post-industrial labor. Theory and Society, 12(3), 309–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171555
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. Falmer Press.
Evetts, J. (2009). The management of professionalism: A contemporary paradox. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and the way forward (pp. 19–30). Routledge.
Fleetwood, S. (2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization Articles, 12(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051188
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Polity Press.
Geirdal, A. Ø., Nerdrum, P., & Olkowska, A. (2024). Mental health and quality of life among Norwegian child welfare service workers. European Journal of Social Work, 27(4), 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2024.2317907
Goodair, B., McManus, A., Esposti, M. D., & Bach-Mortensen, A. (2024). How outsourcing has contributed to England’s social care crisis. British Medical Journal, 387, Article e080380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080380
Harsløf, I. (2003). De frivillige organisasjonenes rolle i aktivisering og arbeidstrening av personer med marginal eller ingen tilknytning til arbeidsmarkedet: En litteraturstudie [The role of voluntary organisations in activating marginalised persons: A literature review] (NOVA skriftserie 7/03). Norwegian Social Research. https://bibliotek.nav.no/record/801?ln=en
Healy, K., & Meagher, G. (2004). The reprofessionalization of social work: Collaborative approaches for achieving professional recognition. British Journal of Social Work, 34(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch024
Hellevik, O. (2007). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3
Heponiemi, T., Kuusio, H., Sinervo, T., & Elovainio, M. (2011). Job attitudes and well-being among public vs. private physicians: Organizational justice and job control as mediators. European Journal of Public Health, 21(4), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq107
Jacobsen, A. (2021). Trygghet i en utfordrende arbeidshverdag [Safety in a challenging workday] [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology]. NTNU Open. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2783436
Johansen, I. (2014). Turnover i det kommunale barnevernet [Turnover in municipal child welfare services] (Rapporter 2014/18). Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/175497?_ts=145d565f0d8
Kaukonen, O., & Stenius, K. (2005). Universalism under re-construction: From administrative coercion to professional subordination of substance misusers. In N. Kildal & S. Kuhnle (Eds.), Normative foundations of the welfare state: The Nordic experience (pp. 130-148). Routledge.
Knudsen, H., Busck, O., & Lind, J. (2011). Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment and Society, 25(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011407966
Kröger, T. (2011). The adoption of market-based practices within care for older people: Is the work satisfaction of Nordic care workers at risk? Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.7577/njsr.2048
la Cour, A. (2012). The love affair between the policy and the voluntary organizations. In N. K. Andersen & I-. J. Sand (Eds.), Hybrid forms of governance: Self-suspension of power (pp. 46–63). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lysgaard, S. (2001). Arbeiderkollektivet: En studie i de underordnedes sosiologi [The worker collective: A sociological study of subordinates]. Scandinavian University Press. (Originally published 1961)
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Martinelli, F., Anttonen, A., & Mätzke, M. (Eds.). (2017). Social services disrupted: Changes, challenges and policy implications for Europe in times of austerity. Edward Elgar.
Meld. St. 4 (2023–2024). Anmodnings- og utredningsvedtak i stortingssesjonen 2022–2023 [Request and investigation decisions in the parliamentary session 2022–2023]. Statsministerens kontor. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-4-20232024/id2997412/
Mosley, J. E. (2020). Social service nonprofits: Navigating conflicting demands. In W. W. Powell & P. Bromley (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3. ed., pp. 251–270). Stanford University Press.
Nordstoga, S., & Støkken, A. M. (2018). Professional work in the squeeze: Experiences from a new control regime in residential care for children and youth in Norway. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 6(2), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v6i2.69
Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs. (2022). Turnover blant ansatte i barnevernet—Hvorfor slutter så mange? [Turnover among employees in the child welfare services—Why are so many quitting?]. Bufdir. https://kudos.dfo.no/documents/32680/files/29119.pdf
Norwegian Ministry of Children and Families. (2022). Skriftlig spørsmål fra John-Peder Denstad (R) til barne- og familieministeren [Written question from John-Peder Denstad (R) to the Minister for Children and Families] (Document no. 15:141). https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Sporsmal/Skriftlige-sporsmal-og-svar/Skriftlig-sporsmal/?qnid=76746
NOU 2020:13. (2020). Private aktører i velferdsstaten: Velferdstjenesteutvalgets delutredning I og II om offentlig finansierte velferdstjenester [Private actors in the welfare state: The Welfare Services Committee's partial report I and II on publicly funded welfare services]. Norwegian Committee for Welfare Services. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2020-13/id2788017/
NOU 2023:24. (2023). Med barnet hele vegen: Barnevernsinstitusjoner som har barnas tillit [With the child all the way: Child welfare institutions that have the children’s trust]. Barne- og familiedepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/3448ea4c535f4d20bbbb1ef4e05fc994/no/pdfs/nou202320230024000dddpdfs.pdf
NOU 2024:17. (2024). Kommersielle og ideelle aktørers rolle i fellesskapets velferdstjenester [Commercial and non-profit actors’ role in delivering welfare services]. Digitaliserings- og forvaltningsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/86a768da997a425fb5c78b7e020078b0/no/pdfs/nou202420240017000dddpdfs.pdf
Olson, B. H., Aarseth, E. S., & Stokken, R. (2022). Statusrapport: Ivaretakelse av ansatte. Kartlegging av arbeidsmiljøet i barnevernstjenestene i Møre og Romsdal [Employee well-being and work environment in child welfare services in Møre og Romsdal] (Rapport nr. 119). University College Volda. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3038409
Omdal, O. O. (2023, February 19). Det som går galt i norsk barnevern, skyldes ikke at barnevernet er privat [What goes wrong in Norwegian child welfare is not caused by the child welfare being private]. Civita. https://civita.no/okonomi/velferdsstaten/velferdstjenester/det-som-gar-galt-i-norsk-barnevern-skyldes-ikke-at-barnevernet-er-privat/
Pålsson, D., Backe-Hansen, E., Kalliomaa-Puha, L., Lausten, M., & Pösö, T. (2022). License to care – Licensing terms for for-profit residential care for children in four Nordic countries. Nordic Welfare Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.7.1.2
Sen, R., Ulybina, O. A., & Holmes, L. (2024). Charting the 21st century rise of for-profit residential child care. Youth, 4(1), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.3390/youth4010019
Shanks, E., & Lundström, T. (2023). Social workers in private sector employment: The case of Sweden. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18261/njsr.14.1.7
Shanks, E., Backe-Hansen, E., Eriksson, P., Lausten, M., Lundström, T., Ranta, H., & Sallnäs, M. (2021). Privatisation of residential care for children and youth in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Nordic Welfare Research, 6(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-4161-2021-03-02
Simmons, C., Rodrigues, R., & Szebehely, M. (2022). Working conditions in the long‐term care sector: A comparative study of migrant and native workers in Austria and Sweden. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(5), 2191–2202. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13657
Sirris, S. (2020). Institutional complexity challenging values and identities in Scandinavian welfare organisations. In H. Askeland, G. Espedal, B. Jelstad Løvaas, & S. Sirris. (Eds.), Understanding values work (pp. 57–77). Palgrave Macmillan.
Slettholm, A. (2024, 30 August). Går det an å tjene både penger og samfunnet? [Is it possible to make money while also serving society?]. Aftenposten, 22.
Sousa-Poza, A., & Henneberger, F. (2004). Analyzing job mobility with job turnover intentions: An international comparative study. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2004.11506667
Statistics Norway. (2024). Barnevernsinstitusjoner [Child welfare institutions] [Dataset]. Statistics Norway. Available at: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/11648
Suddaby, R., Elsbach, K. D., Greenwood, R., Meyer, J. W., & Zilber, T. B. (2010). Organizations and their institutional environments—Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57317486
Svensson, L. G. (2008). Profesjon og organisasjon [Profession and organization]. In A. Molander & L. I. Terum. (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 130–143). Scandinavian University Press.
Tham, P. (2007). Why are they leaving? Factors affecting intention to leave among social workers in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 37(7), 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl054
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. Oxford University Press.
Toikko, T. (2017). What is the best outsourcing strategy? Nonlinear association between the outsourcing degree of institutional care and the costs of substitute care in child welfare within Finnish municipalities. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1190435
Wangberg, I. S., Herning, L. K. K., & Sander, A. (2019). Velferd uten profitt: Fakta og argumenter mot velferdsprofitørene [Welfare without profit: Facts and arguments against profiting from welfare]. Forlaget Manifest.
Wiborg, L. H. (2010). Mellom barn og budsjett: Hvordan forstå barnevernsledelse [Between children and budget: How to understand the management of child protection services]. Kommuneforlaget.
Åkerstrøm Andersen, N. (1996). Udlicitering: Når det private bliver politisk [Outsourcing: When the private becomes political]. Nyt Fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ivan Harsløf, Kirsti Valset
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
