“When You Feel Like There is No Trust in the Profession”—Midwives and Obstetricians Facing Complicated Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6171Abstract
This study examines how two collaborating professions, midwifery and obstetrics, are influenced by women requesting caesarean sections. The empirical material consists of semi-structured interviews with Swedish midwives (n=6) and obstetricians (n=6). Analysed through Tilly’s terms, the categorical pair and triad, midwife and obstetrician function as complementary categories in a triad with the women they encounter. Midwifery is a profession with connotations of closeness, understanding, and a unique connection to birth. It is challenged when women reject support or the idea of vaginal birth as empowering. Obstetrics, as a profession, relates to medical expertise, distance, and overview. It is challenged when their knowledge and authority are rejected. Both professions rely on each other’s complementary roles for support. The midwife draws on the obstetrician’s authority, while the obstetrician draws on the midwife’s empathic knowledge of the woman. When strongly challenged, they uphold their defined positions by questioning the woman’s judgement and rationality.
Downloads
References
Begum, T., Saif‐Ur‐Rahman, K. M., Yaqoot, F., Stekelenburg, J., Anuradha, S., Biswas, T., Dio, S.A., & Mamun, A. A. (2021). Global incidence of caesarean deliveries on maternal request: A systematic review and meta‐regression. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 128(5), 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16491
Brante, T. (2013). The professional landscape: The historical development of professions in Sweden. Professions and Professionalism, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.558
Carlhed Ydhag, C. (2020). Uppkomsten av ett professionellt medicinskt fält: Läkares, sjuksköterskors och laboratorieassistenters formering [The emergence of a professional medical field: The formation of doctors, nurses, and laboratory assistants]. Stockholm University Press. https://doi.org/10.16993/bbc
Eide, K.T., Morken, N.H., & Bærøe, K. (2019). Maternal reasons for requesting planned caesarean section in Norway: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19, Article 102, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6
Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research. Open University Press.
Hildingsson, I., Gamble, J., Sidebotham, M., Creedy, D., Guilliland, K., Dixon, L., Pallant, J., & Fenwick, J. (2016). Midwifery empowerment: National surveys of midwives from Australia, New Zealand and Sweden. Midwifery, 40(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.06.008
Hälso- och sjukvårdslag [Health and medical services act]. (2017). Hälso- och sjukvårdslag (2017:30) [Health and medical services act (2017:30)]. Sveriges Riksdag. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/halso-och-sjukvardslag-201730_sfs-2017-30/
Johannisson, K. (1990). Medicinens öga: Sjukdom, medicin och samhälle—Historiska erfarenheter [The eye of medicine: Illness, medicine, and society—Historical experiences]. Nordstedts.
Johansson, M., Alvan, J., Pettersson, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2023). Conflicting attitudes between clinicians and women regarding maternal requested caesarean section: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05471-2
Larsson, B., Hildingsson, I., Ternström, E., Rubertsson, C., & Karlström, A. (2019). Women’s experience of midwife-led counselling and its influence on childbirth fear: A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 32(1), e88–e94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.04.008
Lindgren, B. H. (2006). Pregnoscape: Den gravida kroppen som arena för motstridiga perspektiv på risk, kön och medicinsk teknik [Pregnoscape: The pregnant body as an arena for contesting perspectives on risk, gender and medical technology] [Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University]. Uppsala University Library. urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-6749
Loke, A. Y., Davies, L., & Mak, Y. W. (2019). Is it the decision of women to choose a caesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders. MC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2
Lyckestam Thelin, I., Lundgren, I., & Nilsson, C. (2019). To challenge oneself as a childbearing woman. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 14(1), Article 1605784. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1605784
Løvåsmoen, E. M. L., Bjørgo, M. N., Lukasse, M., Schei, B., & Henriksen, L. (2018). Women’s preference for caesarean section and the actual mode of delivery—Comparing five sites in Norway. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 16, 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.04.009
National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) (2015). Graviditeter, förlossningar och nyfödda barn. Medicinska födelseregistret 1973–2014. Assisterad befruktning 1991–2013. Sveriges officiella statistik [Pregnancies, deliveries and newborn infants. The Swedish Medical Birth Register 1973–2014. Assisted reproduction treatment 1991–2013. Official statistics of Sweden]. [Dataset]. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2015-12-27.pdf
National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) (2021). Tillgång och efterfrågan på specialistläkare inom samtliga specialiteter [Supply and demand for specialist physicians in all specialties]. [Dataset]. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/contentassets/acd7c15f239d455983f5e4395b2d2ace/2020-2-6638-bilaga-1.pdf
National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) (2024). Statistik om legitimerad hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal 2022 samtarbetsmarknadsstatus 2023 [Statistics on licensed healthcare personnel in 2022 and their labour market status in 2023]. [Dataset]. Socialstyrelsen. https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2024-9-9197.pdf
Nieminen, K. (2016). Clinical aspects of childbirth-related anxiety (Publication No. 1513) [Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A915208&dswid=4307
Panda, S., Daly, D., Begley, C., Karlström, A., Larsson, B., Bäck, L., & Hildingsson, I. (2018a). Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden—a qualitative study. MC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7
Panda, S., Begley, C., & Daly, D. (2018b). Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0202688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202688
Reiger, K. (2008). Domination or mutual recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Social Theory and Health, 6(2), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sth.2007.12
Reiger, K., & Morton, C. (2012). Standardizing or individualizing? A critical analysis of the ‘discursive imaginaries’ shaping maternity care reform. International Journal of Childbirth, 2(3), 173–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.2.3.173
Sackett, D. L. (1997). Evidence-based medicine. Seminars in Perinatology, 21(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-0005(97)80013-4
Sahlin, M. (2020). Thoughts, emotions and experiences in two different generations of women undergoing cesarean section. [Doctoral Dissertation, Karolinska Institutet]. KI Open Archive. https://openarchive.ki.se/articles/thesis/Thoughts_emotions_and_experiences_in_two_different_generations_of_women_undergoing_cesarean_section/26920597?file=48966055
Svensk förening för Obstetrik och Gynekologi [Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology] (2011). Indikation för kejsarsnitt på moderns önskan [Indication for caesarean section on maternal request] (Rapport 2011:09). https://www.sfog.se/dokument/indikation-for-kejsarsnitt-pa-moderns-onskanrapport-201109/
Sydsjö, G., Möller, L., Lilliecreutz, C., Bladh, M., Andolf, E., & Josefsson, A. (2015). Psychiatric illness in women requesting caesarean section. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(3), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12714
Tilly, C. (1999). Durable Inequality. University of California Press.
Wigert, H., Nilsson, C., Dencker, A., Begley, C., Jangsten, E., Sparud-Lundin, C., Mollberg, M., & Patel, H. (2020). Women’s experiences of fear of childbirth: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 15(1), Article 1704484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1704484
Wulcan, A. C., & Nilsson, C. (2019). Midwives’ counselling of women at specialised fear of childbirth clinics: A qualitative study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 19, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.12.001
Zhang, T., Brander, G., Mantel, Ä., Kuja-Halkola, R., Stephansson, O., Chang, Z., Larsson, H., Mataix-Cols, D., & de la Cruz, L. F. (2021). Assessment of caesarean delivery and neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in the children of a population-based Swedish birth cohort. JAMA Network Open, 4(3), e210837–e210837. https://doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0837
Öberg, L. (1996). Barnmorskan och läkaren: kompetens och konflikt i svensk förlossningsvård 1870–1920 [The midwife and the doctor: Competence and conflict in Swedish maternity care 1870–1920] [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University]. Libris. https://libris.kb.se/bib/7634432?vw=full
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lotta Jägervi, Kerstin Svensson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
