The Role of Educational Science in Professional Knowledge: Student Teachers’ Reflections
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6200Abstract
The significance of theoretical knowledge for professional practice is widely acknowledged, but how students in professional education construct meanings of their major subject remains understudied. This study examined how primary student teachers reflect on the role of educational science in their professional knowledge. Textual data were collected after their first practicum in a Finnish primary teacher education programme. Discourse analysis identified four discourses. In the discourse of depth, educational science enabled a thorough understanding of pupils. In the discourse of multifacetedness, simultaneous consideration of multiple aspects of teaching was evident. In the discourse of topicality, teachers could stay updated regarding the knowledge society through educational science. The discourse of systemicity underscored the contribution of educational science to societal progress. This study provides a better understanding of student teachers’ professional knowledge in curriculum development and programme design within teacher education.
Downloads
References
Afdal, H. W., & Spernes, K. (2018). Designing and redesigning research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.011
Alatalo, T., Hansson, Å., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teachers’ academic achievement: Evidence from Swedish longitudinal register data. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1962281
Atkins, L., & Wallace, S. (2012). Qualitative research in education. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957602
Barnett, R. (2005). Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching. McGraw Hill Open University Press.
Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640227
Bäulke, L., Grunschel, C., & Dresel, M. (2022). Student dropout at university: A phase-orientated view on quitting studies and changing majors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37, 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00557-x
Campbell, L. (2018). Pedagogical bricolage and teacher agency: Towards a culture of creative professionalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1425992
Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E., MacIntyre, A., Sato, M., & Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.
Eriksen, A. (2022). The research literacy of professionals: Reconciling evidence-based practice and practical wisdom. Professions and Professionalism, 12(3), Article e4852. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.4852
Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (2012). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.
Goller, M., Ursin, J., Vähäsantanen, K., Festner, D., & Harteis, C. (2019). Finnish and German student teachers’ motivations for choosing teaching as a career. The first application of the FIT-Choice scale in Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 235–248, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.023
Guerriero, S., & Révai, N. (2017). Knowledge-based teaching and the evolution of a profession. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 253–269). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
Hatlevik, I., & Smeby, J. C. (2015). Program coherence and epistemological beliefs. Nordic Psychology, 67, 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2015.1031553
Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). McGraw Hill Open University Press.
Heikkilä, M. (2022a). Agency as polyphony: Student and primary teachers’ narration embedded in theory and practice [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku]. Turku University Library. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-8871-6
Heikkilä, M. (2022b). Methodological insights on teachers’ professional agency in narratives. Professions and Professionalism, 12(3), Article e5038. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5038
Heikkilä, M., & Hermansen, H. (2024). Epistemic coherence in teacher education. In V. Domovic, G. Doetjes, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, & K. Zaki (Eds.), Coherence in European teacher education: Theoretical Models, empirical studies, instructional approaches (pp. 37–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43721-3
Heikkilä, M., Hermansen, H., Iiskala, T., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., & Warinowski, A. (2023). Epistemic agency in student teachers’ engagement with research skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1821638
Hermansen, H. (2020). Knowledge discourses and coherence in professional education. Professions & Professionalism 10(3), Article e3713. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3713
Hermansen, H., & Mausethagen, S. (2023). Beyond the research–practice gap: Constructing epistemic relations in teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 119, Article 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102171
Hordern, J. (2019). Knowledge, evidence, and the configuration of educational practice. Education Science, 9(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020070
Hyvärinen, M. (2008). Analyzing narratives and story-telling. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickmann, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social research methods (pp. 447–460). SAGE.
Jenset, I. S., Hammerness, K., & Klette, K. (2019). Talk about field placement within campus coursework: Connecting theory and practice in teacher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 632–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1415968
Juutilainen, M. (2023). Construction of student teachers’ professional agency in primary teacher education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä]. JYU Dissertations. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-9782-3
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In E. V. Savigny & T. R. Schatzki (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). Routledge.
Leijen, Ä., Allas, R., Pedaste, M., Knezice, D., Marcos Mena, J. J., Meijer, P., Husu, J., Krull, E., & Toom, A. (2015). How to support the development of teachers’ practical knowledge: Comparing different conditions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.455
Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
Lähteenmäki, M., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Laakkonen, E., Warinowski, A., & Clinton, J. (2024). Student teachers’ study profiles—Longitudinal perspective to research-based teacher education. Professions and Professionalism, 14(2), Article e5807. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5807
Mausethagen, S. (2024). Blurred discourses of professionalism in teacher education institutions. Teachers and Teaching, 31(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2439563
Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. Heikkilä, M., Iiskala, T., & Warinowski, A. (2024). Research-based teacher education—A Finnish perspective. In V. Symeonidis (Ed.), Enhancing the value of teacher education research: Implications for policy and practice (3. ed., pp. 42–61). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004689992_003
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Epistemic practices and object relations in professional work. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644909
Peltola, M. (2021). Everyday consequences of selectiveness. Borderwork in the informal sphere of a lower secondary school in the metropolitan area of Helsinki, Finland. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1861930
Phillips, K. P., Eriksen, A., & Mausethagen, S. (2023). Educational research literacy: Philosophical foundations and empirical applications. Professions and Professionalism, 13(2), Article e5307. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5307
Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.004
Reinius, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Korhonen, T. (2024). Teachers’ perceived opportunity to contribute to school culture transformation. Journal of Educational Change, 25, 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09496-4
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). Oxford University Press.
Tatto, M. T. (2015). The role of research in the policy and practice of quality teacher education: An international review. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1017405
TENK. (2023). The Finnish code of conduct for research integrity and procedures for handling alleged violations of research integrity in Finland 2023 (TENK 4/2023). Finnish National Board of Research Integrity TENK. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-05/RI_Guidelines_2023.pdf
Toom, A., & Husu, J. (2018). Teachers’ work in changing educational contexts. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalizing world: Resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching (pp. 1–9). Brill Sense.
Wieser, C. (2016). Teaching and personal educational knowledge—Conceptual considerations for research on knowledge transformation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1253673
Zaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Hiebert, J. (2021). Exploring preservice teachers’ abilities to connect professional knowledge with lesson planning and observation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1996558
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mirva Heikkilä, Ville Mankki, Tuike Iiskala, Mirjamaija Mikkilä-Erdmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
