Developmental Educators: Articulating Identity and Expertise in an Evolving Allied Health Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.6390Keywords:
Developmental Educator (DE), National Disability Insurance Scheme, disability professional, professional identity, professional boundaries, allied health landscape, social determinants of healthAbstract
Developmental Education is an emerging allied health profession in Australia. Developmental Educators (DEs) are disability specialists whose practice is informed by human-rights-based, holistic, and person-centred frameworks. This qualitative descriptive study explores how DEs perceive and articulate their professional identity and scope of practice within the broader allied health sector. Building on prior survey research, two focus groups involving 15 practising DEs were conducted to examine their reflections on previously published findings. Thematic analysis revealed three key themes: professional identity, the breadth and distinctiveness of DEs’ scope of practice, and the perceived need for greater visibility and recognition. Participants described their work as multidisciplinary yet distinct from established professions, emphasising their role in disability practice and interdisciplinary collaboration. This study contributes to the literature on emerging professions by analysing how DEs construct and defend professional boundaries within a historically under-defined domain of disability practice.
Downloads
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. The University of Chicago Press.
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. (2020). Developing professional identity in multi-professional teams. https://www.aomrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Developing_professional_identity_in_multi-professional_teams_0520.pdf
Acocella, I. (2012). The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9600-4
Alderwick, H., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2019). Meanings and misunderstandings: A social determinants of health lexicon for health care systems. Milbank Quarterly, 97(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12390
Allied Health Professions Australia. (n.d.). Allied health professions. Retrieved July, 2025 from https://www.ahpa.com.au/allied-health-professions/
Bottroff, V., Grantley, J., & Brown, R. I. (2000). Tertiary education for professionals in the field of disability studies: Roads of progress and crossroads. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 24(1/2/3), 17–24.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cascio, M. A., Lee, E., Vaudrin, N., & Freedman, D. A. (2019). A team-based approach to open coding: Considerations for creating intercoder consensus. Field Methods, 31(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x19838237
Chreim, S., Williams, B. E. B., & Hinings, C. R. B. (2007). Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1515–1539. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159487
Clark, K., & Vealé, B. (2018). Strategies to enhance data collection and analysis in qualitative research. Radiologic Technology, 89(5), 482CT–485CT.
Colyer, H. (2004). The construction and development of health professions: Where will it end? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03209.x
Commonwealth of Australia. (2026). Foundational Supports for people with disability. https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/foundational-supports-for-people-with-disability?language=en
Copnell, G. (2010). Modernising allied health professions careers: Attacking the foundations of the professions? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820902946115
Developmental Educators Australia Inc. (2023). DEAI Active Members by State. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=846680343914735&set=a.606893794560059
Developmental Educators Australia Inc. (2026a). Scope, Competencies, Ethics, Governance and Complaints. https://deai.com.au/about/#scope
Developmental Educators Australia Inc. (2026b). History of Developmental Education. https://deai.com.au/about/#history
Developmental Educators Australia Inc. (2026c). What is a Developmental Educator? https://deai.com.au/becoming-a-de/#what-is-a-de
Doyle, C., Griffiths, C., McAnelly, S., Atherton, H., Cleary, M., Fleming, S., Gates, B., Keenan, P., & Sutton, P. (2022). Past, present and future: Perspectives on an oral history of intellectual disability nursing. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211065195
Ellison, C., & Lante, K. (2016). People living with disability: Navigating support & health systems. In E. Willis, L. Reynolds, & H. Keleher (Eds.), Understanding the Australian health care system (3rd edition, pp. 181–194). Elsevier.
Ellison, C., & Matthews, B. (2012). Disability professionals: Assisting people living with disability to navigate the health system. In E. Willis, L. Reynolds, & H. Keleher (Eds.), Understanding the Australian health care system (2nd edition, pp. 175–187). Elsevier.
Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
Flinders University. (2025). Bachelor of Disability and Developmental Education. https://handbook.flinders.edu.au/courses/2025/BDDE
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
Hindhede, A., & Larsen, K. (2020). Prestige hierarchies and relations of dominance among healthcare professionals. Professions and Professionalism, 10(2), Article e3447. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3447
Jackson, B. N., Purdy, S. C., & Cooper-Thomas, H. D. (2019). Role of professional confidence in the development of expert allied health professionals: A narrative review. Journal of Allied Health, 48(3), 226–234.
Johnstone, D. (2012). An introduction to disability studies. David Fulton Publishers.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. University of Virginia Press.
Kyratsis, Y., & Meda, F. (2026). Professional identity work in emerging healthcare professions: Current perspectives, gaps, and future directions. Frontiers in Health Services, 6, Article 1778116. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1778116
Leicht, K., & Fennell, M. (2001). Professional work: A sociological approach. Blackwell Publishers.
Mafuba, K., Kiernan, J., Kudita, C., Chapman, H. M., Kupara, D., & Chester, R. (2026). Understanding the contribution of intellectual disabilities nurses: Paper 3 of 4—evaluation. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 30(2), 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295231196588
Mavromaras, K., Moskos, M., Mahuteau, S., & Isherwood, L. (2018). Evaluation of the NDIS: Final report. Department of Social Services (Australia). https://apo.org.au/node/143516
Nancarrow, S., & Borthwick, A. (2021). Emerging allied health professions. In The allied health professions: a sociological perspective (pp. 107–130). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447345381
National Disability Insurance Agency [NDIA] (2021). What is the NDIS? https://www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/what-ndis
O’Cathain, A., & Thomas, K. J. (2004). “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires—A bane or a bonus to research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-25
Palmer, M., Larkin, M., de Visser, R., & Fadden, G. (2010). Developing an interpretative phenomenological approach to focus group data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802513194
People With Disability Australia. (2023). Social model of disability. https://pwd.org.au/resources/models-of-disability/
Rillotta, F., & Alexander, J. (2020). Roles and responsibilities of developmental educators: Disability professionals supporting Australians with disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(2), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1719987
Rubin, O. (2024). Two approaches to school counseling as a profession: From boundaries to core. Professions and Professionalism, 14(1), Article e5448. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.5448
Shakespeare, T. (2017). Chapter 14: The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th Edition, pp. 197–204). Routledge.
Shortell, S. (1974). Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Social Science Medicine, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90003-1
Singh, M. (2018). Value of face-to-face interactions between clinician-educators and patients or students to improve health care education. JMIR Human Factors, 5(2), Article e15. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.9859
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Weber, C. E., Kortkamp, C., Maurer, I., & Hummers, E. (2022). Boundary work in response to professionals’ contextual constraints: Micro-strategies in interprofessional collaboration. Organization Studies, 43(9), 1453–1477.
Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2015). Movement on shifting sands: Deinstitutionalisation and people with intellectual disability in Australia, 1974–2014. Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.980902
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 June Alexander, Rillotta Fiona, Michelle Bellon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
