The Sculptor as Rhythm Analyst

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.4788

Abstract

A sculptor is a practitioner, and in this study, the sculptor's practice as a process is focused. Through this study, the practitioner as a rhythm analyst also becomes a researcher of his own practice. The work process is linked to a sculpture of the football trainer Nils Arne Eggen. The study's analytical question is: How can a sculptor's process with form, movement, material, and timespace be understood in a rhythm-analytical perspective? The term rhythm is understood as the philosopher Henri Lefebvre has described the term as a tool in rhythm analysis. An analysis is carried out by intertwining extracts from the sculptor's thinking texts, conversations, image collages, and theoretical-philosophical reading of concepts related to rhythm as well as to agential realism. There is rhythm in form, movement, and material, rhythm in the sculptor's bodily intra-action with the sculpture, as well as the site-specific rhythm and the timespace created by placing the sculpture on a plinth outdoors. By reading the rhythmic aspects of the sculptor's thinking texts and in conversations with him, through concepts from agential realism, choices in the work process are analysed. The analytical points are collected in four braids. Rhythm as 'meta-sense' makes visible performative potentials articulated as intertwinings comprising the sculptor's thinking, bodily affects, and energy, as well as the materiality of the timespace of the working process.

Cover photo: Ole Martin Wold/ NTB

Author Biographies

Errol Fyrileiv, NTNU

Errol Fyrileiv is a sculptor and an associate professor at NTNU, Department of Teacher Education.

Anna-Lena Østern, NTNU and Åbo Akademi University

Anna-Lena Østern is professor emerita at NTNU and Åbo Akademi University

References

Arlander, A. (2013). Artistic research in a Nordic context. I R. Nelson, Practice as research in the arts. Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistance (s. 152–162). PalgraveMacmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282910_9

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq

Chen, Y. (2018). Practising rhythmanalysis. Theories and methodologies. Rowman & Littlefield.

Danbolt, G. (2014). Frå modernisme til det kontemporære, tendensar i norsk samtidskunst etter 1990. Det norske samlaget.

Danbolt, G. (2002). Blikk for bilder, om tolkning og formidling av billedkunst. Abstrakt forlag.

Gali, A. (2023). Kunst i offentlig rom- formidling og kommunikasjon. I M.K. Flåtter (Red.), Kultur for kunst – Trondheim kommunes kunstsamling (s. 73 –77). Orfeus publishing.

Høgseth, H. B. (2007). Håndverkerens redskapskasse. En undersøkelse av kunnskapsutøvelse i lys av arkeologisk bygningstømmer fra 1000-tallet. (Doktoravhandling, NTNU). NTNU Open. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/242854

Juelskjær, M. (2019). At tænke med agential realisme. Nyt fra samfundsvidenskabene.

Jusslin, S. (2020). Dancing/Reading/Writing Performative potentials of intra-active teaching pedagogies expanding literacy education. (Doktoravhandling), Åbo Akademi University.

Krauss, R. E. (2002). Avantgardens originalitet og andre modernistiske myter. Pax Forlag.

Kruse, B. (2015). Den tenkende kunstner. Komposisjon og dramaturgi som prosess og metode. Fagbokforlaget.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Wiley-Blackwell. (Først utgitt 1974).

Lefebvre, H. (2019). Rhythmanalysis. Space, time and everyday Life. Bloomsbury. (Først utgitt 1992 på fransk; oversatt til engelsk 2004 av Stuart Elden og Gerald Moore og utgitt på Continuum).

Lyon, D. (2021). Rhythmanalysis. Research methods. Bloomsbury.

Mørstad, E. (1992). Skulpturleksikon, begreper og betegnelser i billedhuggerkunsten. Ad Notam Gyldendal.

Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts. Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistance. Palgrave and MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282910

Sørum, E. von Hanno Bast & Sørum, H. von Hanno Bast (2012). Plassering av skulpturer i offentlige uterom. Masteroppgave, Universitetet for miljø- og biovitenskap. Institutt for landskapsplanlegging. https://nmbu.brage.unit.no/nmbu-xmlui/handle/11250/188301?show=full

Sørum, E. von Hanno Bast & Sørum, H. von Hanno Bast (2014). Plassering av skulpturer i offentlige uterom. Fakta, årgang 11 (1). https://fagus.no/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2014_1-FF-Sørum-Skulpturer-plassering-2.pdf

Troelsen, A. (red) (2002). Synsvinkler på skulpturen. Antologi om skulpturanalyse. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Ugelstad J. S. (2014). Portretter 1814- 2014. Sem & Stenersen Forlag.

Ørskov, G. (1995). Om skulptur og skulpturoplevelse. (1. utg, 2. opplag) Borgen.

Sculpture by Errol Fyrileiv of Nils Arne Eggen

Published

2024-06-24

How to Cite

Fyrileiv, E., & Østern, A.-L. (2024). The Sculptor as Rhythm Analyst. Nordic Journal of Art & Research, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.4788

Issue

Section

Articles, peer reviewed