Artistic and Art-Based Research Methods

The Mutual Developments of Theory and Practice in Contemporary Art Research

Forfattere

  • Boel Christensen-Scheel
  • Venke Aure OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet
  • Kristin Bergaust OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/information.5078

Sammendrag

This special issue is intended as a contribution to the field of artistic research with a particular focus on artistic and art-based methods. Finding that reflections and scientific articles on artistic research often argue for the relevance and position of artistic research as research in itself, it is here the intention to promote and develop the variety in artistic research methodology and also discuss the relations between artistic practice and research practice. The issue consists of one previously published video work and 12 original articles – 11 are written in English and one in Danish, the latter will appear in an English translation later this year.

The presented methods cover conceptual, material, analytical and observational modes of research, and most of the authors are both artists and researchers – that is, working in higher education and holding PhDs or positions as professors.

Table of contents

1. Forms of artistic and art-based research

2. Material constrictions and relations

3. Artistic research in a social context

4. Extended conceptions of knowledge in an art-related research context

Forfatterbiografier

Boel Christensen-Scheel

Boel Christensen-Scheel er professor i kunstteori og estetikk ved Kunsthøgskolen i Oslo hvor hun er dekan ved Avdeling kunst og håndverk.

Venke Aure, OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet

Venke aure er professor i kunstdidaktikk ved OsloMet, Fakultet for teknologi, kunst og design, Institutt for estetiske fag, drama og teaterkommunikasjon.

Kristin Bergaust, OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet

Kristin Bergaust er billedkunstner, kunstforsker og professor ved OsloMet, Fakultet for teknologi, kunst og design, Institutt for estetiske fag, drama og teaterkommunikasjon

Referanser

Aure, V. (2020). Exploring Eco-social Art Strategies to Expand Onto-epistemological and Methodological Positions in Qualitative Research. In K. Bergaust, R. Smite and D. Silina (Eds.), Oslofjord Ecologies. Artistic Research on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Acoustic Space Journal 18(3), 135-152. http://rixc.org/en/acousticspace/issue/788/

European Research Council, 2018, How to define research impact. ERC: European Research Council (europa.eu), retrieved September 12th 2022. https://erc.europa.eu/news/how-define-research-impact

Gieryn, T.F. (1983): “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists”, American Sociological Review 48(6) pp. 781-795, https://www.jstor.org/stable/i336539

Kunnskapsdepartmentet, 2018. Forskrift for gradene philosophiae doctor (ph.d.) og philosophiae doctor (ph.d.) i kunstnerisk utviklingsarbeid ved Norges teknisk–naturvitenskapelig universitet (NTNU), Retrieved 21.09.2022. https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2018-12-05-1878

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2022-10-03

Hvordan referere

Christensen-Scheel, B., Aure, V., & Bergaust, K. (2022). Artistic and Art-Based Research Methods: The Mutual Developments of Theory and Practice in Contemporary Art Research. Nordic Journal of Art & Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/information.5078