The stitch project

Traces of diapraxis and al masha within participatory textile projects

Forfattere

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.5796

Emneord (Nøkkelord):

participatory art, embroidery, textile, al masha, diapraxis

Sammendrag

In this article, I shall discuss participation – the artist's role and responsibility in participation, and the potentials of participatory textile projects in the public space. In doing so, I will focus on The stitch project (2012–). This project involves public interaction through acts of tactile textile making such as stitching on a tablecloth. I have based this study within a context of understanding matter and the embodiment of participation from feminist (Ahmed, 2006; Butler, 1988) and new materialist (Barad, 2003; Coole & Frost, 2010; Garber, 2019) perspectives. I am interested in the interactive aspects of The stitch project and how these aspects relate to the concepts of diapraxis (Nunes, 2019) and al masha (Hilal & Petti, 2018). In regard to these terms, I aim to examine the potentials and challenges of participatory textile art projects, like The stitch project, by examining their social and material aspects as well as the complexities of inclusion and participation.

Forfatterbiografi

Marie Skeie, Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge

Marie Skeie is currently a PhD candidate at the University of South-Eastern Norway in the Department of Visual and Performing Arts Education.  She holds an MA in Art and Public Spaces from Oslo National Academy of the Arts and a BA in Sociology from the University of Bergen. For many years she has worked as an artist, curator and producer within the public space often using textiles and a variety of materials and mediums in her work. Skeie’s interest in collective processes and artistic collaboration has led her to initiate and/or participate in projects such as Her og der, (F)jorden, The Stitch Project and Gaza (a)live.

Referanser

Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388074

Ahmed, S. (2019). What's the Use? On the Uses of Use. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478007210

Almaany (n.d.) مشاع . Retrieved October 29 from https://www.almaany.com/en/dict/ar-en/مشاع/

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831.

https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Barney, D., Coleman, G., Ross, C., Sterne, J., & Tembeck, T. (2016). The Participatory Condition. An Introduction. In D. Barney, G. Coleman, C. Ross, J. Sterne, & T. Tembeck (Eds.), The Participatory Condition in the Digital Age (pp. vii-xl). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

Bherer, L., Dufour, P., & Montambeault, F. (2016). The participatory democracy turn: an introduction. Journal of civil society, 12(3), 225-230.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1216383

Boomgaard, J. a. R. B. e. (2017). Being Public: How Art Creates the Public (Making Public). Amsterdam: Valiz.

Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Medford, MA: Polity.

Bryan-Wilson, J. (2017). Fray: Art and Textile Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226369822.001.0001

Burisch, N. (2016). From Objects to Actions and Back Again: The Politics of Dematerialized Craft and Performance Documentation. Textile, 14(1), 54-73.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2016.1142784

Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893

Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk

Coumans, A. (2017). Art as Encounter. In J. B. R. Brom (Ed.), Being public: how art creates the public. Amsterdam: Valiz.

Deadman, R. (2018). Labour of Love, New Approaches to Palestinian Embroidery. In Palestine Museum (Ed.). Birzeit.

Finkelpearl, T. (2014). Participatory Art. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Garber, E. (2019). Objects and New Materialisms: A Journey Across Making and Living With Objects. Studies in Art Education, 60(1), 7-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2018.1557454

Hilal, S., & Petti, A. (2018). Permanent temporariness. Stockholm: Art and Theory Publishing.

Kawar, W. K. (2011). Threads of Identity: Preserving Palestinian Costume and Heritage. Limassol, Cyprus: Rimal Publication.

Kwon, M. (2002). One place after another: site-specific art and locational identity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5138.001.0001

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Stitch. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stitch

Mitchell, V. (2013). Dialog stitching with metonymy. Textile, 11(3), 314-319.

https://doi.org/10.2752/175183513x13793321037601

Nunes, D. F. (2019). The Power of Listening: Diapraxis, Play and Another Grammar for the City. Oslo Biennalen First Edition 2019 - 2024: New, Ongoing and Completed by October 2019. Kulturetaten Oslo kommune.

Weizman, E. (2010). Introduction. In M. Miessen (Ed.), The nightmare of participation: (crossbench practice as a mode of criticality) (pp. 9-12). New York: Sternberg.

Wiktionary (n.d.) Action. Retrieved November 17, 2019 from https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=action&oldid=78207185

Hands of a person doing embroidery in The Stitch Project

Nedlastinger

Publisert

2024-04-07

Hvordan referere

Skeie, M. (2024). The stitch project: Traces of diapraxis and al masha within participatory textile projects. Nordic Journal of Art & Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/ar.5796