Public-Private Innovation in Health and Social Care: The Implications of Transaction Costs


  • Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad Centre for Care Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Eirin Lodgaard SINTEF Raufoss Manufacturing AS
  • Siv Magnussen Centre for Care Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology



Public-private innovation, health and social care, transaction costs, Norway


In response to the continual pressure on health and social services worldwide, there has been a demand for innovation in this sector. One area of interest has been collaboration between public and private actors in developing new solutions for service delivery. So far, knowledge of how such private-public innovation (PPI) processes emerge has been limited. We studied barriers to PPI, focusing on how transaction costs influence the innovation process.

We conducted a single case study, following the collaborative efforts of a Norwegian municipality and a local fire and rescue company searching for new care service delivery models. The data consist of interviews with central stakeholders and documents from the PPI process. The findings add to the knowledge on barriers in public-private innovation by highlighting transaction costs as a factor influencing the PPI process. An increased awareness of transaction costs throughout the innovation process may be important in planning and resource allocation. Findings from this case study may be useful in the development and implementation of innovative ideas. Our case illustrates the need for organisational change in service innovation. A focus on transaction costs can provide a useful tool for analysing necessary structures and their consequences when beginning PPI initiatives. 


Allen, P., Croxson, B., Roberts, J. A., Archibald, K., Crawshaw, S., & Taylor, L. (2002). The use of contracts in the management of infectious disease related risk in the NHS internal market. Health Policy, 59(3), 257–281.

Andreassen, H. K., Kjekshus, L. E., & Tjora, A. (2015). Survival of the project: A case study of ICT innovation in health care. Social Science & Medicine, 132, 62–69.

Ashton, T. (1998). Contracting for health services in New Zealand: A transaction cost analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 46(3), 357–367.

Bell, C.R. (2010). Transaction cost economics in 21st Centrury Economics: A referance handbook. Sage.

Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In J. Benington & M. H. Moore (Eds.), Public value: Theory and Practice (pp. 1–30). Macmillian International Higher Education.

Blåka, S., Tjerbo, T., & Zeiner, H. H. (2012). Kommunal organisering 2012. Redegjørelse for Kommunal-og regionaldepartementets organisasjonsdatabase. [Municipal organisation 2012. Account of the Ministry of Local governments database] Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.

Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15–33.

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

Carr, J. B., LeRoux, K., & Shrestha, M. (2009). Institutional ties, transaction costs, and external service production. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 403–427.

Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230.

Dittmer, P., Christiansen, C., & Kierkegaard, G. F. (2008). Public private partnership for innovation (PPPI) in Denmark. European Public Private Partnership Law Review, 4(4), 240–242.

Donato, R. (2010). Extending transaction cost economics: Towards a synthesised approach for analysing contracting in health care markets with experience from the Australian private sector. Social Science & Medicine, 71(11), 1989–1996.

Eberstadt, N., & Groth, H. (2007). Europe's coming demographic challenge: Unlocking the value of health: AEI Press.

Evald, R. M., Nissen, A. H., Clarke, H. A., & Munksgaard, B. K. (2014). Reviewing: Cross-field public private innovation. Literature: Current research themes and future research themes yet to be explored. International Public Management Review, 15(2), 32–57.

Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

Fuglsang, L., Hulgård, L., & Langergaard, L. L. (2015). An updated list of municipal public-private innovation studies in Europe, especially Nordic studies. Roskilde University.

Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass.

Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.

Hjalmarsson, A., Johannesson, P., Jüll-Skielse, G., & Rudmark, D. (2014). Beyond innovation contests: A framework of barriers to open innovation of digital services. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2014 Tel Aviv.

Klein, P.G. (2005) The make-or-bye decision: Lessons from empirical studies. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 435–464). Springer.

Magnussen, S. (2016). The power of enthusiasm in collaborative innovation: a case study of the power of individual action in the establishment of a local medical centre in Norway. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 7, 31–45.

Mick, S. F and Shay, P.D. (2016) Accontable care organizations and transaction cost economics. Medical Care Research and Review, 73(6), 649–659.

Nissen, A. H., Evald, R. M., & Clarke, A. H. (2014). Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through public-private-innovationpartnerships. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3).

North, D. C. (1995). The new institutional economics and third world development. In J. Harriss, C. Lewis, & J. Hunter (Eds.), The new institutional economics and third world development (pp. 17–26). Routledge.

Palmer, N., & Mills, A. (2003). Classical versus relational approaches to understanding controls on a contract with independent GPs in South Africa. Health Economics, 12(12), 1005–1020.

Roberts, P., & Greenwood, R. (1997). Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained-efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption. The Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 346–373.

Rubalcaba, L., Windrum, P., Gallouj, F., Di, M., Pyka, A., Sundbo, J., & Weber, M. (2011). ServPPIN. The contribution of public and private services to European growth and welfare, and the role of public-private innovation networks. Servppin final publishable summary report. European Commission.

Rønning, R. (2015). Innovations in social welfare and human services - the nobel art of tringulation. Paper presented at the Social Innovation Research Conference (SIRC), Shanghai.

Rønning, R., & Knutagård, M. (2015). Public innovation. A question of power? In R. Rønning & M. Knutagård (Eds.), Innovation in social welfare and human services (pp. 47–57). Routledge.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice: Margrit Schreier. SAGE.

Schroll, A., & Mild, A. (2012). A critical review of empirical research on open innovation adoption. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 62(2), 85–118.

Stiles, R. A., Mick, S. S., & Wise, C. G. (2001). The logic of transaction cost economics in health care organization theory. Health Care Management Review, 26(2), 85–92.

Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842-868.

Tavares, A. F., & Camöes, P. J. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 535–553.

Tavares, A. F., & Feiock, R. C. (2014). Intermunicipal cooperation and regional governance in Europe: an institutional collective action framework. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.

Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge University Press.

Vabø, M., Christensen, K., Jacobsen, F. F., & Trætteberg, H. D. (2013). Marketisation in Norwegian eldercare: preconditions, trends and resistance. In G. Meagher & M. Szebehely (Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A research report Stockholm: Department of Social Work, Stockholm University.

Wang, Y. S., Wu, S. C., Lin, H. H., Wang, Y. M., & He, T. R. (2012). Determinants of user adoption of web "automatic teller machines": An integrated model of "transaction cost theory" and "innovation diffusion theory". The Service Industries Journal, 32(9), 1505–1525.

Weihe, G., Højlund, S., Holljen, T. B. E., Petersen, H. O., Vrangbæk, K., & Ladenburg, J. (2011). Strategic use of public-private cooperation in the Nordic region. Nordic Concil of Ministers.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Free Press.

Williamson, O.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press

Williamson, O. E., & Masten, S. E. (1995). Transaction cost economics: Vol. 1: Theory and concepts. Edward Elgar.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.




How to Cite

Sogstad, M. K. R., Lodgaard, E., & Magnussen, S. (2020). Public-Private Innovation in Health and Social Care: The Implications of Transaction Costs. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 11(1), 129–150.




Cited by