The Principle of Singularity
A Retrospective Study of How and Why the Legislation Process behind Sweden’s Education Act came to Prohibit Joint Leadership for Principals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2757Keywords:
education act, principal, school unit, shared leadershipAbstract
This paper provides insight into the legislative process behind the current Education Act of Sweden. The aim is to shed light on how and why it came to prohibit joint leadership for principals. Joint leadership is a sub-form of shared leadership between managers characterised by complete formal authority, hierarchic equality and merged work tasks. The sharing of a principal’s position is, in previous research, identified as potentially favourable for principals and schools as it decreases principals’ often heavy workload. Five retrospective interviews were done with people involved in the legislative process. The analysis points out both distrust in the governing line and uninformed notions of leadership among legislators as explanations behind the prohibition. In the legislative work, joint leadership was at most a marginal issue. Thus the legal prohibition was an unintended side-effect, yet completely in line with traditional and uninformed notions of leadership. The principle of singularity ruled and joint leadership was extinguished for principals without considering whether this favoured or harmed the overarching aims of the Education Act: increased peda-gogical responsibility and leadership with a focus on the students’ learning, results and democratic upbring-ing.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035612001
Aspers, P. (2011). Etnografiska metoder. Att förstå och förklara samtiden. Malmö: Liber.
Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x
Bolden, R., Jones, S., Davis, H., & Gentle, P. (2015). Developing and sustaining shared leadership in higher education. Stimulus paper. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.
Bratton, J. (2010). Organizational design. In J. Bratton, P. Sawchuk, C. Forshaw, M. Callinan & M. Corbett (Eds.), Work and organizational behaviour (2 ed., pp. 276–306). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brooking, K., Collins, G., Court, M. R., & O'Neill, J. (2003). Getting below the surface of the principal recruitment 'crisis' in New Zealand primary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410304700204
Böhlmark, A., Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2012). The headmaster ritual: The importance of management for school outcomes (Working paper 2012:16). Uppsala: The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
Court, M. R. (1998). Women challenging managerialism: Devolution dilemmas in the establishment of co-principalships in primary schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439869763
Court, M. R. (2003). Towards democratic leadership. Co-principal initiatives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120304823
de Voogt, A., & Hommes, K. (2007). The signature of leadership: Artistic freedom in shared leadership practice. The John Ben Shepperd Journal of Practical Leadership, 2(1), 1–5.
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.667612
Ds. (2009:25). Den nya skollagen - för kunskap, valfrihet och trygghet. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
Döös, M. (2015). Together as one: Shared leadership between managers. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n8p46
Döös, M., Backström, T., Melin, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2012). Isolated cases or widespread practice? The occurrence of sharing managers in Swedish working life. Economics and Business Letters, 1(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.1.3.2012.23-36
Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., & Backström, T. (2013). Delat ledarskap. Om chefer i samarbete. Stockholm: Liber.
Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017a). The shared principalship: Invitation at the top. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1321785
Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017b). Shared principalship: The perspective of close subordinate colleagues. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1384503
Eckman, E. W. (2006). Co-principals: Characteristics of dual leadership teams. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600549596
Eckman, E. W. (2007). The coprincipalship: It's not lonely at the top. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 313–339.
Eckman, E. W. (2018). A case study of the implementation of the co-principal leadership model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1278243
Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2010). Female traditional principals and co-principals: Experiences of role conflict and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 11(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9116-z
Fayol, H. (2008). Industriell och allmän administration (K. Holmblad Brunsson, Trans.). Stockholm: Santérus.
Feltenius, D. (2011). En ren partiangelägenhet? Om regionala och lokala intressen i författningspolitiken. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 113(3), 291–312.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Gronn, P. (2015). The view from inside leadership configurations. Human Relations, 68(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714563811
Jarl, M. (2012). Skolan och det kommunala huvudmannaskapet. Malmö: Gleerups.
Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011433525
Kelchtermans, G., Piot, L., & Ballet, K. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals' work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2010.545192
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Liljenberg, M. (2018). Att stärka skolans och förskolans förbättringskapacitet genom kunskap om den inre organisationen. In O. Johansson & L. Svedberg (Eds.), Att leda mot skolans mål (3 ed., pp. 261–274). Malmö: Gleerups.
Madestam, J. (2017). En rektor när staten åter vill styra. Förändringar i skollagen som uttryck för metagovernance. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 94(2), 37–58.
Nihlfors, E., & Johansson, O. (2014). Låt rektor och förskolechef få leda! In E. Nihlfors & O. Johansson (Eds.), Skolledare i mötet mellan nationella mål och lokal policy (pp. 231–238). Malmö: Gleerups.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prop. (1990/91:18). Om ansvaret för skolan. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
Prop. (2009/10:165). Den nya skollagen - för kunskap, valfrihet och trygghet. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
Prop. (2016/17:171). En ny kommunallag. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet.
Rosengren, K., & Bondas, T. (2010). Supporting "two-getherness": Assumption for nurse managers working in a shared leadership model. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 26(5), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2010.08.002
Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905
SOU. (2002:121). Skollag för kvalitet och likvärdighet. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
SOU. (2015:22). Rektorn och styrkedjan. Betänkande av Utredningen om rektorernas arbetssituation inom skolväsendet. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678
Strandberg, U. (2015). Kommunal självstyrelse. In I. Mattson & O. Petersson (Eds.), Svensk författningspolitik (2 ed., pp. 189–212). Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
The Education Act. (SFS 2010:800). Skollagen.
Thomson, P., & Blackmore, J. (2006). Beyond the power of one: Redesigning the work of school principals. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0003-6
Wilhelmson, L. (2006). Transformative learning in joint leadership. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(7–8), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620610693042
Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2016). Joint principalship: A potential support for democratic practice in schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.31681
Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2018). Samledarskap i skola och förskola - en förlorad potential. In O. Johansson & L. Svedberg (Eds.), Att leda mot skolans mål (2:3 ed., pp. 151–164). Malmö: Gleerups.
Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgement. Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Örnberg, Å. (2016). Rättsliga förutsättningar att dela på rektorsuppgiften i grund- och gymnasieskola. Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift, 2016(1), 141–157.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Marianne Döös, Lena Wilhelmson, Jenny Madestam, Åsa Örnberg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
