The Principle of Singularity

A Retrospective Study of How and Why the Legislation Process behind Sweden’s Education Act came to Prohibit Joint Leadership for Principals

Authors

  • Marianne Döös Stockholm University
  • Lena Wilhelmson
  • Jenny Madestam
  • Åsa Örnberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2757

Keywords:

education act, principal, school unit, shared leadership

Abstract

This paper provides insight into the legislative process behind the current Education Act of Sweden. The aim is to shed light on how and why it came to prohibit joint leadership for principals. Joint leadership is a sub-form of shared leadership between managers characterised by complete formal authority, hierarchic equality and merged work tasks. The sharing of a principal’s position is, in previous research, identified as potentially favourable for principals and schools as it decreases principals’ often heavy workload. Five retrospective interviews were done with people involved in the legislative process. The analysis points out both distrust in the governing line and uninformed notions of leadership among legislators as explanations behind the prohibition. In the legislative work, joint leadership was at most a marginal issue. Thus the legal prohibition was an unintended side-effect, yet completely in line with traditional and uninformed notions of leadership. The principle of singularity ruled and joint leadership was extinguished for principals without considering whether this favoured or harmed the overarching aims of the Education Act: increased peda-gogical responsibility and leadership with a focus on the students’ learning, results and democratic upbring-ing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2003). Managers doing leadership: The extra-ordinarization of the mundane. Human Relations, 56(12), 1435–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035612001

Aspers, P. (2011). Etnografiska metoder. Att förstå och förklara samtiden. Malmö: Liber.

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.x

Bolden, R., Jones, S., Davis, H., & Gentle, P. (2015). Developing and sustaining shared leadership in higher education. Stimulus paper. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

Bratton, J. (2010). Organizational design. In J. Bratton, P. Sawchuk, C. Forshaw, M. Callinan & M. Corbett (Eds.), Work and organizational behaviour (2 ed., pp. 276–306). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brooking, K., Collins, G., Court, M. R., & O'Neill, J. (2003). Getting below the surface of the principal recruitment 'crisis' in New Zealand primary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 47(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410304700204

Böhlmark, A., Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2012). The headmaster ritual: The importance of management for school outcomes (Working paper 2012:16). Uppsala: The Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.

Court, M. R. (1998). Women challenging managerialism: Devolution dilemmas in the establishment of co-principalships in primary schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand. School Leadership & Management, 18(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439869763

Court, M. R. (2003). Towards democratic leadership. Co-principal initiatives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120304823

de Voogt, A., & Hommes, K. (2007). The signature of leadership: Artistic freedom in shared leadership practice. The John Ben Shepperd Journal of Practical Leadership, 2(1), 1–5.

Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.667612

Ds. (2009:25). Den nya skollagen - för kunskap, valfrihet och trygghet. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.

Döös, M. (2015). Together as one: Shared leadership between managers. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(8), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n8p46

Döös, M., Backström, T., Melin, M., & Wilhelmson, L. (2012). Isolated cases or widespread practice? The occurrence of sharing managers in Swedish working life. Economics and Business Letters, 1(3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.1.3.2012.23-36

Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., & Backström, T. (2013). Delat ledarskap. Om chefer i samarbete. Stockholm: Liber.

Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017a). The shared principalship: Invitation at the top. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1321785

Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Å. (2017b). Shared principalship: The perspective of close subordinate colleagues. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1384503

Eckman, E. W. (2006). Co-principals: Characteristics of dual leadership teams. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600549596

Eckman, E. W. (2007). The coprincipalship: It's not lonely at the top. Journal of School Leadership, 17(3), 313–339.

Eckman, E. W. (2018). A case study of the implementation of the co-principal leadership model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1278243

Eckman, E. W., & Kelber, S. T. (2010). Female traditional principals and co-principals: Experiences of role conflict and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Change, 11(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9116-z

Fayol, H. (2008). Industriell och allmän administration (K. Holmblad Brunsson, Trans.). Stockholm: Santérus.

Feltenius, D. (2011). En ren partiangelägenhet? Om regionala och lokala intressen i författningspolitiken. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 113(3), 291–312.

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

Gronn, P. (2015). The view from inside leadership configurations. Human Relations, 68(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714563811

Jarl, M. (2012). Skolan och det kommunala huvudmannaskapet. Malmö: Gleerups.

Jones, S. (2014). Distributed leadership: A critical analysis. Leadership, 10(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011433525

Kelchtermans, G., Piot, L., & Ballet, K. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principals' work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2010.545192

Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Liljenberg, M. (2018). Att stärka skolans och förskolans förbättringskapacitet genom kunskap om den inre organisationen. In O. Johansson & L. Svedberg (Eds.), Att leda mot skolans mål (3 ed., pp. 261–274). Malmö: Gleerups.

Madestam, J. (2017). En rektor när staten åter vill styra. Förändringar i skollagen som uttryck för metagovernance. Nordisk Administrativt Tidsskrift, 94(2), 37–58.

Nihlfors, E., & Johansson, O. (2014). Låt rektor och förskolechef få leda! In E. Nihlfors & O. Johansson (Eds.), Skolledare i mötet mellan nationella mål och lokal policy (pp. 231–238). Malmö: Gleerups.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Prop. (1990/91:18). Om ansvaret för skolan. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.

Prop. (2009/10:165). Den nya skollagen - för kunskap, valfrihet och trygghet. Stockholm: Utbildnings­departementet.

Prop. (2016/17:171). En ny kommunallag. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet.

Rosengren, K., & Bondas, T. (2010). Supporting "two-getherness": Assumption for nurse managers working in a shared leadership model. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 26(5), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2010.08.002

Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905

SOU. (2002:121). Skollag för kvalitet och likvärdighet. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.

SOU. (2015:22). Rektorn och styrkedjan. Betänkande av Utredningen om rektorernas arbetssituation inom skolväsendet. Stockholm: Statens Offentliga Utredningar.

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678

Strandberg, U. (2015). Kommunal självstyrelse. In I. Mattson & O. Petersson (Eds.), Svensk författningspolitik (2 ed., pp. 189–212). Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.

Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

The Education Act. (SFS 2010:800). Skollagen.

Thomson, P., & Blackmore, J. (2006). Beyond the power of one: Redesigning the work of school principals. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0003-6

Wilhelmson, L. (2006). Transformative learning in joint leadership. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(7–8), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620610693042

Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2016). Joint principalship: A potential support for democratic practice in schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.31681

Wilhelmson, L., & Döös, M. (2018). Samledarskap i skola och förskola - en förlorad potential. In O. Johansson & L. Svedberg (Eds.), Att leda mot skolans mål (2:3 ed., pp. 151–164). Malmö: Gleerups.

Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgement. Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

Örnberg, Å. (2016). Rättsliga förutsättningar att dela på rektorsuppgiften i grund- och gymnasieskola. Förvaltningsrättslig tidskrift, 2016(1), 141–157.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-02

How to Cite

Döös, M., Wilhelmson, L., Madestam, J., & Örnberg, Åsa. (2018). The Principle of Singularity: A Retrospective Study of How and Why the Legislation Process behind Sweden’s Education Act came to Prohibit Joint Leadership for Principals. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2(2-3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2757