Lokal yrkesfagskultur og ulikhet i fortellinger om ungdoms utdanningsvalg
- et stedssensitivt blikk på Oslo og Rogaland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3246Keywords:
educational aspirations; vocational education; place sensitivity; place; youthAbstract
The literature on vocational educational aspirations typically lacks a conception of space, place and local employment opportunities. This article compares two locations in Norway, that is, the capital Oslo, characterised by knowledge-intensive industries, and a rural district in Rogaland, characterised by manufacturing and oil-related industries, to illuminate how aspirations, class and location intersects. In Oslo, there is a lack of available apprenticeships, a strong east-west segregation regarding enrolment to vocational education and training, and few schools provide vocational programs. In contrast, Rogaland has a firmly established vocational culture, and large shares of youth opt for vocational educations following ten years of compulsory schooling. Drawing on interviews with young people in Oslo and Rogaland, the case-comparative analysis illustrates how these two locations are (re)producing very different educational logics, directing youth either away from or towards vocational education. The article aims to contribute to understandings of educational aspirations by advocating place-sensitivity in the complex ways that social inequality in education is shaped, maintained and reinforced.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Baker, D. P. (2011). The Future of the Schooled Society: The Transforming Culture of Education in Postindustrial Society. I M. T. Hallinan (Red.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education (Vol. 1, pp. 11-34): Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1576-9_2.
Bakken, A. (2018). Ung i Oslo 2018 (NOVA rapport 6/18). Oslo: NOVA, OsloMet.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Macrae, S. (2000). Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16. New Youth, New Economies in the Global City. London: Routledge.
Berg, N. G. (2007). Social and cultural geography in Norway: from welfare to difference, identity and power: Country report. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(2), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701360246.
Brekke, I., Røed, M., & Schøne, P. (2013). Påvirker innvandring investeringen i utdanning? Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 30(3), 169-188.
Colley, H., James, D., Diment, K., & Tedder, M. (2003). Learning as becoming in vocational education and training: class, gender and the role of vocational habitus. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 55(4), 471-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820300200240.
Evans, C. (2016). Moving away or staying local: the role of locality in young people's ‘spatial horizons’ and career aspirations. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(4), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1083955.
Evans, C. (2017). Framing young people’s educational transitions: the role of local and contemporary economic contexts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(5), 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1150154.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
Fosso, E. J. (2004). Unges flytting – et spørsmål om identitet og myter om marginale og sentrale steder? I N. G. Berg, B. Dale, H. K. Lysgård, & A. Løfgren (Red.), Mennesker, steder og regionale endringer (pp. 119-135). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2007). Young people and social change : new perspectives (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Grytnes, R. (2011). Making the right choice! Inquiries into the reasoning behind young people’s decisions about education. YOUNG, 19(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881101900305.
Haakestad, H., & Friberg, J. H. (2017). Deskilling revisited: Labour migration, neo-Taylorism and the degradation of craftwork in the Norwegian construction industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17735671.
Hansen, J. C. (2004). Ungdoms forhold til sted: Er Rjukan et blivende sted? I N. G. Berg, B. Dale, H. K. Lysgård, & A. Løfgren (Red.), Mennesker, steder og regionale endringer (pp. 102-118). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
Hodkinson, P., & Sparkes, A. C. (1997). Careership: A Sociological Theory of Career Decision Making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569970180102.
Høst, H. (Red.) (2015). Kvalitet i fag- og yrkesopplæringen. Sluttrapport (NIFU rapport 14/2015). Oslo: NIFU.
Kindt, M., & Hegna, K. (2017). Innvandrerdriv og klasseposisjon blant yrkesfagelever og elitestudenter – om innvandrerungdoms valg av høyere utdanning. I J. Ljunggren (Red.), Oslo – ulikhetenes by (pp. 275-291). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Kintrea, K., St Clair, R., & Houston, M. (2015). Shaped by place? Young people's aspirations in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.992315.
Lefebvre, H., & Nicholson-Smith, D. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Oxford Blackwell.
Ljunggren, J. (2017). Oslo og sosial ulikhet. I J. Ljunggren (Red.) (2017). Oslo – ulikhetenes by (pp. 11-28). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
Massey, D. (2013). Space, place and gender. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Olsen, O. J., Reegård, K., Seland, I., & Skålholt, A. (2015). Læringsmiljø og gjennomføring. I H. Høst (Red.), Kvalitet i fag- og yrkesopplæringen: Sluttrapport (pp. 83-144). NIFU rapport 14/2015. Oslo/Bergen: NIFU/Fafo/UiB/HiOA.
Oslo kommune. (2017). Næringsliv, sysselsetting og pendling. Hentet fra https://www.oslo.kommune.no/politikk-og-administrasjon/statistikk/boliger-byggevirksomhet-arbeids-og-naringsliv/naringsliv-sysselsetting-og-pendling/.
Paulgaard, G. (2002). Local identities in a 'globalised world'. YOUNG, 10(3-4), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880201000307.
Paulgaard, G. (2008). Re-centring periphery: negotiating identities in time and space. I J. O. Bærenholdt & B. Granås (Red.) (2008). Mobility and Place: Enacting Northern European Peripheries (pp. 49-60). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Roberts, K. (1968). Entry into employment: An approach towards a general theory. Sociological Review, 16(2), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1968.tb02570.x.
Rogaland fylkeskommune. (2019). Andel elever (Vg1) på yrkesfaglig utdanning. Hentet fra https://www.rogalandstatistikk.no/statistikk/b554221d-1af2-4167-a58f-df18f583339b.
Rosten, M. G. (2017). Territoriell stigmatisering og gutter som «leker getto» i Groruddalen. Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift, 1(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2017-01-04.
SSB. (2018a). Befolkningens utdanningsnivå. Fylkestall. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/utniv.
SSB. (2018b). KOSTRA nøkkeltall. Videregående opplæring. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/kommunefakta/kostra/rogaland/videregaende-opplaering.
Thiem, C. H. (2009). Thinking through education: the geographies of contemporary educational restructuring. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 154-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508093475.
Thompson, R., Russell, L., & Simmons, R. (2014). Space, place and social exclusion: an ethnographic study of young people outside education and employment. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.793793.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2017). Søkertall videregående opplæring for skoleåret 2016-2017. Hentet fra https://www.udir.no/globalassets/filer/tall-og-forskning/statistikk/sokere-til-vgo/sokere-til-vgo-2016---notat.pdf.
Vogt, K. C. (2013). Approaches to work and education over the life course. A two-cohort study of men skilled in male-dominated manual occupations in Norway (PhD thesis). University of Bergen, Bergen.
Wacquant, L., & Howe, J. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Kristinn Hegna, Kaja Reegård
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.