Barn og unges hverdagssteder i endring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3293Keywords:
youth, education, place, neighbourhood, social changeAbstract
This article describes the ways in which children and young people’s everyday places have changed in the course of the Post-war period in Norway and suggests some opportunities and constraints arising from these changes. The analysis is based on biographical interviews with three generations in 23 Norwegian families, in addition to a wide selection of relevant research and statistics. Children and young people’s everyday places have become more institutionalized, organized and digitalized, and neighbourhoods have become less important as sites of everyday interaction. This development has varying implications for different groups of young people. Those who experience failure in school are in the greatest need of experiences of mastery in other areas. Recruitment to organized leisure activities is closely related to parental resources, and whereas experiences of household work previously could point the way into prac-tical occupations, many practically inclined young people now lack direction, opportunities and motiva-tion, except for different varieties of consumption. The mastery experienced in today’s everyday places can be relevant and valuable in the labour market, albeit in different ways than the building, tinkering and care work of previous periods.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aanerød, L. M. T., & Mossige, S. (2018). Nettovergrep mot barn i Norge 2015–2017: Rapport basert på erfaring fra Kripos, politiet, tjenesteleverandører og internasjonal forskning (NOVA Rapport 10/18). Hentet fra http://kriminalitetsforebygging.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Nettutg-NOVA-Rapport-Nettovergrep-10-2018.pdf
Abbott, A. (1997). Of Time and Space: The Contemporary Relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75(4), 1149–1182. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/75.4.1149
Aries, P. (1965). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. Oxford: Vintage Books.
Bakke, I. M., & Solheim, L. J. (2016). "Skulle ønske jeg kunne være med på turn, jeg" Om fattige foreldres utfordringer med å legge til rette for barnas fysiske aktivitet. I Ø. Seippel, M. K. Sisjord, & Å. Strandbu (Red.), Ungdom og idrett (s. 193–212). Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
Bakken, A. (2018). Ungdata Nasjonale Resultater (NOVA Rapport 8/18). Hentet frå: http://www.hioa.no/content/download/147550/4124628/file/Ungdata-2018.%20Nasjonale%20resultater.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.84.2.191
Bertaux, D. (1981). Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bikova, M. (2017). The Egalitarian Heart. Global Care Chains in the Filipino Au Pair Migration to Norway (PhD-avhandling). Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen.
Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2011). Comparative biographies in case-based cross-national research: methodological considerations. Sociology, 45(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511406602
Brattbakk, I., & Andersen, B. (2018). Barn og unge på Grønland og Tøyen: Trange innerom og risikable uterom. Oslospeilet, 2(Juni), 13–23.
Christie, N. (1971). Hvis skolen ikke fantes. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Dunne, C. (2011). The Place of the Literature Review in Grounded Theory Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the Great Depression: Social Change in Life Experience. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Elder, G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. I J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Red.), Handbook of the life course (s. 3–19). New York: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_1
Epland, Jon (2017). Færre unge har deltidsjobb. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/arbeid-og-lonn/artikler-og-publikasjoner/faerre-unge-jobber. Lesedato: 15.03.2019.
Eriksen, I. M., & Seland, I. (2019). Ungdom, kjønn og fritid (NOVA Rapport 6/19). Hentet fra https://fagarkivet.oslomet.no/nb/item/asset/dspace:13345/NOVA-Rapport-6-2019-Ungdom,%20kjønn%20og%20fritid-Ingunn-Marie-Eriksen.pdf
Farrugia, D. (2015). Space and place in studies of childhood and youth. I J. Wyn & H. Cahill (Red.), Handbook of children and youth studies (s. 609–624). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_25
Friberg, J. H. (2016). Arbeidsmigrasjon: hva vet vi om konsekvensene for norsk arbeidsliv, samfunn og økonomi? (Fafo-rapport 2016-02). Hentet fra https://www.fafo.no/index.php/zoo-publikasjoner/fafo-rapporter/item/arbeidsmigrasjon
Frønes, I. (1979). Et sted å være - et sted å lære: en bok om sosial læring og forebyggede miljøarbeid. Oslo: Tiden.
Frønes, I. (1997). The transformation of childhood: children and families in postwar Norway. Acta Sociologica, 40(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939704000102
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (2000). Case study method: Key texts, key issues. London: Sage.
Gullestad, M. (1988). Agents of modernity: children's care for children in urban Norway. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 23, 38–52.
Gullestad, M. (1996). From obedience to negotiation: dilemmas in the transmission of values between the generations in Norway. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034631
Hagestad, G. (2008). The book-ends: emerging perspectives on children and old people. I C. Saraceno (Red.), Families, Ageing and Social Policy: Intergenerational Solidarity in European Welfare States (s. 20–37). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Hansen, M. N. (2011). Finnes det en talentreserve? Betydningen av klassebakgrunn og karakterer for oppnådd utdanning. Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 28(3), 173–189.
Hareven, T. K. (1985). Historical changes in the family and the life course: implications for child development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(4/5), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333860
Hareven, T. K. (1994). Aging and generational relations: A historical and life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.20.1.437
Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. E. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online: in-depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of 9- to 16-year-olds and their parents in 25 European countries. London: EU Kids Online.
Heggelund, A. R., Anderssen, H., & Schmidt, I. (2017). Ungdom og fritid: Klubbundersøkelsen 2016 / 2017. Hentet fra https://www.ungdomogfritid.no/wp-content/uploads/180207-klubbundersøkelsen.pdf. Lesedato 14.03.2019.
Herlofson, K., & Hagestad, G. (2012). Transformations in the role of grandparents across welfare states. I S. Arber & V. Timonen (Red.), Contemporary Granparenting: Changing Family Relationships in Global Contexts (s. 27–50). Brison: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429681.003.0002
Hill, R. (2017). Bakgrunn for bruk av betalt leksehjelp i videregående skole: En kvalitativ studie av elever og foreldre (Masteroppgave). Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen.
Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Isaksen, L. W., Devi, S. U., & Hochschild, A. R. (2008). Global care crisis: a problem of capital, care chain, or commons? American Behavioral Scientist, 52(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208323513
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Katznelson, N., Sørensen, N. U., & Illeris, K. (2018). Understanding Learning and Motivation in Youth. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170039
Kitterød, R. (2016). Mot et symmetrisk foreldreskap? Yrkesarbeid og familiearbeid blant foreldre i Norge. I I. Frønes & L. Kjølsrød (Red.), Det Norske Samfunn. 7. utg. Oslo: Gyldendal.
Kjørholt, A. T. (2013). Childhood as social investment, rights and the valuing of education. Children & Society, 27, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12037
Kunnskapsdepartmenetet (2006) ... og ingen sto igjen: Tidlig innsats for livslang læring. (Meld. St. 16 2006-2007). Hentet fra https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/a48dfbadb0bb492a8fb91de475b44c41/no/pdfs/stm200620070016000dddpdfs.pdf
Lidèn, H., & Kitterød, R. (2019). Delt bosted: Barns perspektiver og utfyllende kunnskap (Institutt for samfunnsforskning Rapport 2019:3). Hentet fra https://samfunnsforskning.brage.unit.no/samfunnsforskning-xmlui/handle/11250/2580824
Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose Lives? How History, Societies, and Institutions Define and Shape Life Courses. Research in Human Development, 1(3), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427617rhd0103_3
Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nilsen, A. (1996). Stories of Life - Stories of Living. Women's Narratives and Feminist Biographies. Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 1(4), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.1996.9959686
Nilsen, A. (2014). Cohort and generation: concepts in studies of social change from a lifecourse perspective. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(3), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674314X14110459685627
Nilsen, A. C. E., & Wærdahl, R. (2015). Gender differences in Norwegian children’s work at home. Childhood, 22(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568213518082
Olsen, O. J. (2004). The Firm as a Place of Learning in Vocational Education. Results From Studies of Norwegian VET. I R. Husemann & A. Heikkinen (Red.), Governance and marketization in vocational and continuing education (s. 177–189). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Paiva, D. (2015). Experiencing virtual places: insights on the geographies of sim racing. Journal of Cultural Geography, 32(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2014.978128
Parsons, T. (1955). The American Family. I T. P. R. F. Bales (Red.), Family: socialization and interaction process (s. 3–33). Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York: Penguin.
Ryder, N. B. (1965). The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090964
Rønningsen, T. M. V. (2018). Det musikalske og det institusjonelle livsløpet - En kvalitativ studie av musikkens betydning i unge menneskers liv (Masteroppgave). Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen.
Sax, L. (2015). The Collapse of Parenting. New York: Basic Books.
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000602
SSB. (2019a). Gjennomføring i videregående opplæring. Statistisk Sentralbyrå. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/vgogjen. Lesedato: 15.03.2019.
SSB. (2019b). Historisk statistikk. Examen artium/fullført treårig allmennfaglig studieretning.Statistisk sentralbyrå. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/a/histstat/tabeller/5-5-11t.html. Lesedato: 15.03.2019.
SSB. (2019c). Historisk statistikk. Folkemengde, fødte, døde, ekteskap, flyttinger og folketilvekst. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Hentet fra https://www.ssb.no/a/histstat/tabeller/3-13.html. Lesedato: 15.03.2019.
Stefansen, K., Smette, I., & Strandbu, Å. (2018). Understanding the increase in parents’ involvement in organized youth sports. Sport, Education and Society, 23(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1150834
Strandbu, Å., Gulløy, E., Andersen, P. L., Seippel, Ø., & Dalen, H. B. (2017). Ungdom, idrett og klasse: Fortid, samtid og framtid. Norsk Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 1(02), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2017-02-03
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1927). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turkle, S. (2016). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York: Penguin.
Vassenden, A. (2017). Bolig og barnevern. I I. Studsrød & S. E. Tuastad (Red.), Barneomsorg på norsk: i samspill og spenning mellom hjem og stat (s. 39–61). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Vestel, V., & Smette, I. (2007). Fritidsklubben som forebyggende arena – har den «gått ut på dato»? Tidsskrift for Ungdomsforskning, 7(1), 77–102.
Vogt, K. C. (2017a). From job-seekers to self-searchers: changing contexts and understandings of school-to-work transitions. YOUNG Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 26(4S), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308817741006
Vogt, K. C. (2017b). Men in Manual Occupations: Changing Lives in Times of Change. Oslo: Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.17585/noasp.10.30
Vogt, K. C. (2017c). Vår utålmodighet med ungdom. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 58(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2017-01-05
Vogt, K. C. (2018a). Age norms and early school leaving. European Societies, 20(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2017.1358391
Vogt, K. C. (2018b). The timing of a time out: the gap year in life course context. Journal of Education and Work, 31(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2017.1407493
Wærness, K. (1978). The invisible welfare state: women's work at home. Acta Sociologica, 1978(Supplement), 193–207.
Zimbardo, P., & Coulombe, N. (2015). Man (dis)connected: How Technology has Sabotaged What it Means to be Male. London: Rider.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Kristoffer Vogt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.