Perception of final year radiography students towards the proposed six-year Doctor of Radiography/Medical Imaging program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.4758Keywords:
Doctoral degree program, Medical Imaging students, Perception, RadiographersAbstract
Introduction: Medical imaging or radiography as a profession has evolved considerably. As a result, the radiography/medical imaging program would need to be upgraded to keep up with the changes. The purpose of this study was to find out how final-year radiography students feel about the proposed six-year Doctor of Radiography/Medical Imaging program.
Methods: From June to October 2021, a cross-sectional study of final-year radiography students was undertaken at the University of Cape Coast. All students received pilot tested questionnaires through email. There were 29 questions in all, grouped into three sections A, B and C. Data was analyzed statistically with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.
Results: This survey drew a total of 83 students, with 62 males (75%) and 21 females (25%) participating. The mean of all the listed items in section B was 1.78 while C was 1.77. This indicated strong optimistic about the proposed program's ability to generate high-quality, exceptional and diverse imaging specialists.
Conclusion: The final year students had a favorable perception toward the proposed six-year Doctor of Radiography/Medical Imaging program. As a result, they are confident that the program would result in more flexible imaging experts than the four-year bachelor's degree.
References
Sloane C, Miller PK. Informing radiography curriculum development: The views of UK radiology service managers concerning the ‘fitness for purpose’ of recent diagnostic radiography graduates. Radiography. 2017;23:S16-S22. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.013
Gorleku PN, Setorglo J, Edzie EK, et al. Assessment of effectiveness of problem based learning pedagogical approach in radiography education in a tertiary institution in Ghana. Univers J Educ Res. 2020;8(3):1108-1117. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080346
Pratt S, Adams C. How to create a degree course in radiography: A recipe. Radiography. 2003;9(4):317-322. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2003.10.003
Adejo T. An Inquest into the Quests and Conquests of the Radiography Profession in Nigeria. Vol 33.; 2019. doi:10.48153/jrrs/rubh5255
Lawal O, Ramlaul A, Murphy F. Problem based learning in radiography education: A narrative review. Radiography. 2021;27(2):727-732. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.001
McNulty JP, England A, Shanahan MC. International perspectives on radiography practice education. Radiography. 2021;27(4):1044-1051. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.04.004
Couto JG, McFadden S, Bezzina P, McClure P, Hughes C. An evaluation of the educational requirements to practise radiography in the European Union. Radiography. 2018;24(1):64-71. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.07.009
McNulty JP, Rainford L, Bezzina P, et al. A picture of radiography education across Europe. Radiography. 2016;22(1):5-11. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2015.09.007
England A, Geers-van Gemeren S, Henner A, et al. Clinical radiography education across Europe. Radiography. 2017;23:S7-S15. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.05.011
Strudwick RM. Radiography Education. Ethnogr Radiogr. 2021;(January):73-82. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7252-1_6
Boyd L, Henderson I, Rowntree P. Radiography Education Framework. Int Soc Radiogr RadiolTechnolDoc.2014;(July).https://www.isrrt.org/pdf/Radiography_Education_Framework_2014.pdf
Wuni AR, Courtier N, Kelly D. Developing a policy framework to support role extension in diagnostic radiography in Ghana. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021;52(1):112-120. doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2020.09.013
Ganguly D, Chakraborty S, Balitanas M, Kim TH. Medical imaging: A review. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol 78 CCIS.; 2010:504-516. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16444-6_63
Saunders-Russell CT. Critical Review of Literature on Radiologic Technology Education Program Evaluation. Open J Med Imaging. 2016;06(04):108-122. doi:10.4236/ojmi.2016.64011
Wuni AR, Courtier N, Kelly D. Opportunities for radiographer reporting in Ghana and the potential for improved patient care. Radiography. 2020;26(2):e120-e125. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2019.09.011
Ghana Society of Radiographers. Radiography in Ghana. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://ghanasor.org/radiography-in-ghana/
Idowu BM, Okedere TA. Diagnostic Radiology in Nigeria: A Country Report. J Glob Radiol. 2020;6(1). doi:10.7191/jgr.2020.1072
Foley S, Paulo G, Vassileva J. Large differences in education and training of radiographers in Europe and Central Asia: Results from an IAEA coordinated study. Radiography. 2021; doi:10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.016
Maduka BU. Doctor of Radiography Curriculum: Comparison of the Perception of Radiography Lecturers and Radiography Students towards the Proposed Curriculum. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2021;37(5):29809-29814. doi:10.26717/bjstr.2021.37.006063
Maduka BU, Ugwu AC, Adirika BN. Perception of radiography lecturers towards the proposed doctor of radiography program. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(1). doi:10.1186/s43055-021-00488-z
Lehto JT, Hakkarainen K, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Saarto T. Undergraduate curriculum in palliative medicine at Tampere University increases students’ knowledge. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):1-9. doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0182-8
Alaamer AS. Radiography Education and Training in Saudi Arabia. Open J Radiol. 2012;02(04):134-140. doi:10.4236/ojrad.2012.24025
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Emmanuel Fiagbedzi, Philip Nii Gorleku, Savanna Nyarko, Bernard Frimpong, Alberta Adjei, Abel Nkrumah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).