MR imaging of scaphoid fractures. Fat-saturated T2-weighted and Short tau inversion recovery images.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/radopen.2150Emneord (Nøkkelord):
bone bruise, fat saturation, image quality, magnetic resonance imaging, scaphoid, short tau inversion recovery,Sammendrag
Objective: Traumatic injuries of os scaphoideum are serious, and might lead to two main grades of consequences (i.e. osteoarthrosis or avascular necrosis), if a fracture remains undiagnosed. Bone bruise may be the only pathological sign of pain which can last for week or month. Articles describe the importance of early MRI and hereby predict bone bruise with the help of fat suppression sequence; however, only a limited selection articles compares various fat suppression techniques. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T2 fat saturation (FAT SAT) sequences, sectional directed along the scaphoid bone axis. In relation to background fat intensity suppression, this study sought the sequence that best evaluated posttraumatic bone marrow edema (bone bruise) on scaphoid injury musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5 T extremity scanner).
Materials and methods: Two hundred and fifty-one patients with relevant trauma and positive clinical test for scaphoid bone fractures, exceeding no more than 14 days, underwent MRI examinations. A fast STIR and T2 FAT SAT fast spin echo sequence (FSE) were obtained using a comparable parameter setting (scan time ca. 3 minutes). Three experienced readers (one radiographer and two radiologists) carried out the evaluation blinded to each other’s, based on a quantitative assessment of size (area) and image quality (image contrast, IC and contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR). The study period lasted March 2014-April 2015. Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. This prospective study was ethically approved by the institutional review board.
Results: There were no significant difference between the bone bruise areas (P=0.45, P=0.44 and P=0.83) or CNR (P=0.31, P=0.38 and P=0.17). However, image contrast showed significant difference in favour of T2 FAT SAT in all three readers’ reports (P<0.05, P<0.05 and P<0.05).
Conclusions: The two sequences appear almost identical. An interchangeable usage of the two sequences was found being acceptable for the diagnosis if the protocol is composed appropriately (1.5T). However, the T2 FAT SAT provided a higher image contrast by specific settings (e.g. short TI = 125 ms) compared to STIR.
Referanser
2. Geijer M. Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture: optimal imaging techniques. Reports in Medical Imaging. 2013;57–69. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S48951
3. Eustace S, Keogh C, Blake M, Ward RJ, Oder PD, Dimasi M. MR imaging of bone oedema: mechanisms and interpretation. Clinical Radiology. 2001 Jan;56(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0585
4. Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, Aro MR, Dean CW, Gold GE, et al. Fat-Suppression Techniques for 3-T MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.341135130
5. Murthy NS. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in scaphoid fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013 Oct;38(10):2047–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.055
6. Resnick DL, Kang HS, Prefferklieber ML. Internal Derangements of Joints, Vol 1. 2nd Eds. Saunders. 2007
7. Thavarajah D, Syed T, Shah Y, Wetherill M. Does scaphoid bone bruising lead to occult fracture? A prospective study of 50 patients. Injury. 2011;42(11):1303–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.02.020
8. Mccullough MP, Smith FW, Cooper JG. Early MRI in the management of the clinical scaphoid fracture. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011 18(3) 133-6.
https://doi.org./10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32833edb59
9. Taljanovic MS, Karantanas A, Griffith JS, Desilva GL, Rieke JD, Sheppard JE. Imaging and Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures and Their Complications. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology. 2012;16(2):159–74. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1311767
10. Rhemrev SJ, Ootes D, Beeres F, Meylaerts S, Schipper IB. Current methods of diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011;4(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-4
11. Mallee W, Doornberg JN, Ring D, van Dijk CN, Maas M GJ. Comparison of CT and MRI for diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2011;93(1):20–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S48951
12. Sendher R, Ladd AL. The Scaphoid. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2013;44(1):107–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2012.09.003
13. Bergh TH, Lindau T, Soldal LA, Bernardshaw SV, Behzadi M, Steen K BC. Clinical scaphoid score (CSS) to identify scaphoid fracture with MRI in patients with normal x-ray after a wrist trauma. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2014;31(8):659–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202219
14. Shetty S, Sidharthan S, Jacob J, Ramesh B. “Clinical scaphoid fracture”: Is it time to abolish this phrase? Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2011;93(2):146–8. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X560886
15. Cameron I. Techniques of Fat Suppression. MR Phys Ottawa Hosp 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 2009;7 http://cds.ismrm.org/protected/09MProceedings/files/Tues C36_01 Cameron.pdf
16. Kijowski1 R , Farber JM, Medina J, Morrison W, Jyng J, Buckwalder K. Comparison of Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Fast Spin-Echo Sequence and Modified STIR Sequence in the Evaluation of the Rotator Cuff Tendon. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005;185(2):8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850371
17. Dodd JD. Evidence-Based Practice in Radiology: Steps 3 and 4--Appraise and Apply Diagnostic Radiology Literature. Radiological Society of North America. 2007;242(2):342–54. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051679
18. Razavi SA, Sadigh G, Kelly AM CP. Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities for the diagnosis of upper and lower urinary tract malignancy: a critically appraised topic. Academic Radiology. 2012;19(9):1134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.004
19. El-Maraghi RH KA. CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis. Academic Radiology. 2009;16(5):564–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.008
20. GE Healthcare, Milwaukee. ONI Optima 1.5T MR430s Extremity. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. [Cited 2017 April 26] Available from: http://www3.gehealthcare.com/en/support/site_planning
21. Tomura N, Saginoya T, Kokubun M, Tsuchiya M, Yamamoto T. T2-weighted IDEAL fast spin echo imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison with STIR. Acta Radiologica. 2015;0(0):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114552292
22. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics Belmont, CA:Thomson-Brooks/Cole. 2006.
23. McRobbie DW, Moore EA, Graves MJ, Prince MR. MRI from Picture to Proton. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. 359 p.
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
