What “what we know” does – a posthuman review methodology


  • Sofie Sauzet




This article unfolds a case, an argument and methodology for a posthuman approach for doing reviews from the vantage point of knowledge-fields where educational politics and knowledge production are entangled. As case, the article draws on a review on the topic of ‘social educators in schools’, following a reform of the public school in Denmark. From this review, an analytical strategy for performing ‘extendings’, is developed. ‘Extendings’ are defined as the analytical performance of co-existing, contradictory, statements concerning the same object of knowledge, within and across publications. ‘Extendings’ are proposed as an empirically embedded concept, as posthuman reviewing is considered performative of what particular knowledge-political fields do to their objects of knowledge. A posthuman, performative review methodology, then, is suggested to afford a change in knowledge-claims. The change involves a move away from representations of “what we know”, towards analytical performances of what “what we know does” to educational practice.


Metrics Loading ...




How to Cite

Sauzet, S. (2021). What “what we know” does – a posthuman review methodology. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4246