Thinking with the world – to explore the becoming of phenomena




This article discusses how it is possible to think with the world in educational research. How can this thinking with the world generate knowledge about the becoming of phenomena? To answer this question this paper undertakes a diffractive reading of selected texts from Niels Bohr, Karen Barad, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, Donna Haraway, and Michel Serres. This diffractive reading reveals that the world becomes with itself contributing to an internal principle or an inner self-differentiation. This means that all phenomena can be understood as related to the world in one way or another. This paper contends that the researcher body is important to investigations of the becoming of phenomena with the world, therefore a haptic sensorium is developed as a means to visualize bodily affects and to recognize limit values to the world, for example, background noise. The article concludes with a discussion about creating knowledge of this process as a rhizome. The article attempts to illustrate that thinking with the world can generate new knowledge to understand the becoming of phenomena, which can contribute to the development of educational research.


Metrics Loading ...


Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the Material Self. Indiana University Press.

Anderson, B. & Harrison, P. (2010). Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography. Routledge.

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801-831.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice to come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240-268.

Barad, K. (2012). On touching – The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A journal of feminist cultural studies, 23(3), 206-223.

Bayley, A. & Taylor, C. A. (Eds.) (2018). Posthuman pedagogies. Parallax, 24(3), 243-253.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Bergstedt, B. (Ed.) (2017a). Posthumanistisk pedagogik, Teori, undervisning och forskningspraktik, Gleerups.

Bergstedt, B. & Herbert, A. (2017b). Pedagogik för förändring. Röster som utmanat kunskap och samhälle, Studentlitteratur.

Bergson, H. (1979). Creative mind: Introduction to metaphysics. Rowman & Littlefield.

Bohr, N. (2013). Filosofiska skrifter: Bind I–III. Forlaget Philosophia.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.

Christensen, I. (2018). Verden ønsker at se sig selv. Gyldendal.

Colebrook. C. (2010). Deleuze and the meaning of life. Continuum.

Danielsson, U. (2020). Världen själv. Fri Tanke förlag.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (2015). Tusen platåer. Tankekraft.

Favrholdt, D. (2009). Filosoffen Niels Bohr. Informations Forlag.

Grosz, E. (2018). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics and the limits of materialism. Colombia University Press.

Grusin, R. (Ed.) (2015). A Nonhuman Turn. University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (149-181). Routledge.

Haraway, D. (2004/1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In The Haraway Reader (63-124). Routledge.

Haraway, D. (2004). The Donna Haraway reader. Routledge.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Duke University Press.

Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and descriptions. Routledge.

Juelskjær, M. (2019). At tænke med Karen Barads agential realisme. Samfundslitteratur.

Juelskjær, M. (2020). Mattering pedagogy in precarious times of (un)learning. Matter: Journal of new materialist research, 1(1), 52-79.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

Lyngsø, N. (1994). En eksakt rapsodi: Om Michel Serres' filosofi. Borgens Forlag.

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press.

Otterstad, A. M. (2018). Å stå i trøbbelet. Kartograferinger av barnehageforskningens metodologier. Postkvalitativa passager og (ny)emipriske brytninger. Dr.Philos avhandling. Universitetet i Oslo.

Rawlings, A. (2019). Sound of mull. Laboratory for Aesthetics and Ecology.

Serres, M. (1993). Naturpagten. Rhodos.

Serres, M. (1997). The troubadour of knowledge. The University of Michigan Press.

Serres, M. (1998). Genese. Gyldendal.

Serres, M. (2007). The parasite. University of Minnesota Press.

Sjögren, H. (2016). Sustainability for Whom? The Politics of Imagining Environmental Change in Education. Linköping University, Dr- Philos. Department of Thematic Studies.

Spinoza, B. (2001). Etiken. Bokförlaget Thales.

Staunæs, D. & Krejsler, J. (2013). Editorial: Desire and (self-)management: Post-Lenses on Nordic intakes of transnational tendencies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(9), 1097-1110.

Staunæs, D & Kofoed, J. (2015). Producing curious affects: visual methodology as a an affecting and conflictual wunderkammer, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(10), 1229-1248.

St. Pierre, E. (2013). The post continues: becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.




How to Cite

Bergstedt, B. (2021). Thinking with the world – to explore the becoming of phenomena. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 12(2).




Cited by