On following and becoming a follower
A phenomenological analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4871Keywords:
phenomenology, methodology, social media, algorithms, event memoryAbstract
This paper uses phenomenological analysis to consider the phenomenon of becoming a follower. The data includes my field notes from mediated encounters with three of the most-subscribed YouTube content creators, as well as my personal recollections about these experiences, which are interspersed as event memories throughout my notes. Analyzing my event memories of these encounters enables me to follow my affective relationship to these YouTubers and their content, to untangle some of these knobby multiplicities and map the possibilities of following as they emerge. As I follow following around, as a researcher and (perhaps) as a follower myself, I reflect on the role of algorithms shaping who, what, and how we follow online media. Lastly, the methodological ramifications of a researcher becoming a follower–how following and researching bleed into each other, and why this matters–are also explored in this paper.
Metrics
References
Abidin, C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. ADA: Journal of Gender, New Media and Technology, 8. https://adanewmedia.org/2015/11/issue8-abidin/
Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2007). A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107078139
Ahmed, S. (2010). In M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29-51). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047-001
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jkj2
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373377
Airoldi, M., Beraldo, D., & Gandini, A. (2016). Follow the algorithm: an exploratory investigation of music on YouTube. POETICS, 57, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.05.001
Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching Television Without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans. Television & New Media, 9(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476407307241
Are, C. (2021). The shadowban cycle: An autoethnography of pole dancing, nudity and censorship on Instagram. Feminist Media Studies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1928259
Arthurs, J., Drakopoulou, S., & Gandini, A. (2018). Researching YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517737222
Atay, A. (2020). What is cyber or digital autoethnography? International Review of Qualitative Research, 13(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720934373
BBC Asia. (2018, January 11). YouTube punishes Logan Paul over Japan suicide video. Retrieved December 30, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42644321
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716
Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2017). ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: The role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1288611
Brown, N. M. (2019). Methodological cyborg as black feminist technology: Constructing the social self using computational digital autoethnography and social media. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 19(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708617750178
Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd Ed.). Polity.
Caplan, R., & Gillespie, T. (2020). Tiered governance and demonetization: The shifting terms of labor and compensation in the platform economy. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120936636
Carah, N. (2017). Algorithmic brands: A decade of brand experiments with mobile and social media. New Media & Society, 19(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815605463
Ceci, L. (2023, February 6). Leading countries based on YouTube audience size as of January 2023. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/280685/number-of-monthly-unique-youtube-users/
Chapple, C., & Cownie, F. (2017). An investigation into viewers’ trust in and response towards disclosed paid-for-endorsements by YouTube lifestyle vloggers. Journal of Promotional Communications, 5, 110–36.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage.
Click, M. A. (Ed.) (2019). Anti-fandom: Dislike and hate in the digital age. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479866625.001.0001
Cunningham, S. & Craig, D. (2017). Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: Authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media International Australia, 164(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X17709098
Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14-S32.
Coté, M. & Pybus, J. (2007). Learning to immaterial labour 2.0: MySpace and social networks. ephemera, 7(1), 88–106. http://instruct.uwo.ca/mit/3771-001/Immaterial_Labour2_0.pdf
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672
Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum, 23(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310903003270
Davidson, E., Edwards, R., Jamieson, L., & Weller, S. (2019). Big data, qualitative style: A breadth-and-depth method for working with large amounts of secondary qualitative data. Quality & Quantity, 53, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0757-y
Dixon, S. (2023, February 14). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2023, ranked by number of monthly active users. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Dowling M. (2007). From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.026
Duffy, B. E., & Wissinger, E. (2017). Mythologies of creative work in the social media age:
Fun, free, and “just being me.” International Journal of Communication, 11, 4652-4671.
Feleatua, R. (2018). Insta brand me: Playing with notions of authenticity. Continuum, 32(6), 721–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1525921
Flyverbom, M. (2016). Transparency: mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication, 10, 110–122
franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C. and the Association of Internet Researchers (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Goodrow, C. (2021, September 15). On YouTube’s recommendation system. Inside YouTube [blog]. https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/on-youtubes-recommendation-system/
Giles, D. C. (2017). How do fan and celebrity identities become established on Twitter? A study of ‘social media natives’ and their followers. Celebrity Studies, 8(3), 445-460.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2017.1305911
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In: Gillespie T, Boczkowski PJ, Foot KA (Eds), Media technologies (pp. 167–194). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009
Gray, J. (2003). New audiences, new textualities: Anti-fans and non-fans. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877903006001004
Gray, J. (2005). Antifandom and the moral text: Television without pity and textual dislike. The American Behavioral Scientist, 48(7), 840–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204273171
Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538646
Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., & Eslami, M. (2014). A path to understanding the effects of algorithm awareness [Paper presentation]. CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Canada), Toronto, Ontario (pp. 631-642). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2578883
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Harman, S., & Jones, B. (2013). Fifty shades of ghey: Snark fandom and the figure of the anti-fan. Sexualities, 16(8), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713508887
Horak, L. (2014). Trans on YouTube: Intimacy, visibility, temporality. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2815255
“How YouTube Works.” (n.d.). YouTube. Retrieved March 7, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/
Jerslev, A. (2016). In the time of the microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. International Journal of Communication, 10, 19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5078/1822
Kane, G. C., Alavi, M., Labianca, G., & Borgatti, S. P. (2014). What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.13
Kim, J. (2012). The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture and Society, 34(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711427199
Lange, J. (2021). Platform stabilization: an autoethnographic exploration of the multiple relations and role of data behind the interface of online tutoring software. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1786708
Lee, J. E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5753-5760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
Leskin, P. (2020, February 18). YouTuber Jake Paul is trying to cash in on teaching fans how to become influencers – two years after his first project failed. Business Insider. Retrieved December 19, 2021, from https://www.businessinsider.com/jake-paul-financial-freedom-movement-influencer-school-edfluence-team-1000-2020-2
Lupton, D. (2019). Data selves: More-than-human perspectives. Polity Press.
Lupton, D., & Watson A. (2021). Towards more-than-human digital data studies: Developing research-creation methods. Qualitative Research, 21(4), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120939235
Markham, A. (2021). The limits of the imaginary: Challenges to intervening in future speculations of memory, data, and algorithms. New Media & Society, 23(2), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929322
Marwick, A. (2013, July 8). ‘They’re really profound women, they’re entrepreneurs’: Conceptions of authenticity in fashion blogging [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), Cambridge, MA.
Marwick, A. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the Instagram economy. Public Cultures, 27 (1), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807
Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H. (2015). Brand authenticity: Testing the antecedents and outcomes of brand management’s passion for its products. Psychology and Marketing, 33 (6), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20888
O’Callaghan, D., Greene, D., Conway, M., Carthy, J., & Cunningham, P. (2015). Down the (White) rabbit hole: The extreme right and online recommender systems. Social Science Computer Review, 33 (4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314555329
Paasonen, S. (2016). Fickle focus: Distraction, affect and the production of value in social media. First Monday, 21(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i10.6949
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Ramadan, Z., Farah, M.F., & Dukenjian, A. (2018). Typology of social media followers: the case of luxury brands. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(5), 558-571. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-01-2018-0039
Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736983
Raun, T. (2018). Connecting with the dead: Vernacular practices of mourning through photo-sharing on Facebook. In R. Andreasson, M. N. Petersen, K. Harrison, & T. Raun (Eds.), Mediated intimacies: Connectivities, relationalities and proximities (pp. 193-207). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315208589-17
Risi, E. & Pronzato, R. (2022). Back to practices and narratives: Auto-ethnography as a practice of access to data and algorithms. In G. Punziano & A. Delli Paoli (Eds.), Handbook of research on advanced research methodologies for a digital society (pp. 265-279). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8473-6.ch017
Roose, K. (Host). (2019). Rabbit hole [Audio podcast]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/column/rabbit-hole
Saurwein, F., & Spencer-Smith, C. (2021). Automated trouble: The role of algorithmic selection in harms on social media platforms. Media and Communication, 9(4), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4062
Schmidt, J., Merten, L., Hasebrink, U., Petrich, I., & Rolfs, A. (2019). How do intermediaries shape news-related media repertoires and practices?: Findings from a qualitative study. International Journal of Communication, 13, 853-873.
Sinclair, M. N. (2020). Unsettling transcription through “event memory”: Problem and possibility in exploring the phenomenological question. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(5), 447-453.
Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
Stokel-Walker, C. (2018, April 20). YouTube has turned into a merch-plugging factory, and the Pauls are leading the way. New York Magazine. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/04/jake-paul-and-logan-paul-are-youtube-merch-monsters.html
St. Pierre E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611–635). SAGE.
St. Pierre E. A., Jackson A., Mazzei L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616638694
Thorndahl, K. L., & Frandsen, L. N. (2021). Logged in while locked down: Exploring the influence of digital technologies in the time of corona. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(7), 870–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420960176
Tolson, A. (2010). A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511834
Torrance, H. (2019). Data as entanglement: New definitions and uses of data in qualitative research, policy, and neoliberal governance. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 734-742.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418807239
Tufekci, S. (2019, April 22). How recommendation algorithms run the world. Wired. Retrieved January 11, 2021, from https://www.wired.com/story/how-recommendation-algorithms-run-the-world/
Van der Nagel, E. (2018). Networks that work too well. Media International Australia, 168(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18783002
Van Driel, L., & Dumatrica, D. (2020). Selling brands while staying “authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers. Convergence, 27(1), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520902136
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Van Manen, M. (2017). But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 775-779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699570
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maureen Brewster
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
