Regarding String: A Theory-Method-Praxis of/for Co-compos(t)ing Feminist Hope


  • Carol A. Taylor University of Bath
  • Karen Tobias-Green
  • Julia Sexton
  • Joan Healey



String, regard, hope, feminism, posthumanism, feminist new materialism


This article explores string – what string does, makes possible, and makes happen –as lively matter in co-compos(t)ing human-nonhuman objects, bodies and space. Based on the happenings-doings-thinking generated from a recent workshop, and taking a line of flight with-from Haraway’s (2016) Staying with the Trouble, the article considers how string figuring co-compos(t)ings can work as a post-qualitative experimental feminist materialist/posthumanist research-creation practice which moves outside normative research methods. The article develops a stringly-thingly methodology to explore string figuring’s temporal and spatial possibilities, and propose a theorisation of ‘regard’ which works as a feminist materialist enactment of response-ability which makes better futures in the here-and-now become do-able and thinkable. The theory-method-praxis we propose is an orientation  of/for co-compos(t)ing feminist hope.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Carol A. Taylor, University of Bath

Professor of Gender and Higher Education



Acker, S. & Wagner, A. (2019). Feminist scholars working around the neoliberal university. Gender and Education, 31(1), 62–81.

Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. London: Duke University Press.

Ault, A. (2015). How do spiders make their webs?, accessed 1 January 2018.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Berlant, L. (2010). Cruel optimism. In M. Gregg & G. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader. Duke University Press, Durham, NC (93–117).

Bhattacharya, K. (2021). Rejecting labels and colonization: In exile from post-qualitative approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 179–184.

Bozalek, V. (2017). Slow scholarship in writing retreats: A diffractive methodology for response-able pedagogies. Society for Research in Higher Education Annual Conference, Newport, South Wales, UK.

Brinkmann, S. (2015). GOFQI and the phoenix of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21 (7), 620–622.

Charteris, J., Jones, M., Nye, A. & Reyes, V. (2017) A heterotopology of the academy: mapping assemblages as possibilised heterotopias. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(4), 340–353.

Colebrook, C. (2010). Toxic feminism. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 323–335.

Davis, B. (2021). Entanglement in the world’s becoming and the doing of new materialist inquiry. London: Routledge.

Deleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues II: Revised edition. New York: Columbia University press.

Deleuze, G., and Guattari. F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1991) What is philosophy? London, Verso.

Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. Henley-on-Thames: Routledge and Kegan Paul Limited.

Eastop, D. (2014). String figures matter: Embodied knowledge in action. Craft Research, 5(2), 221–229.

Fairchild, N., Taylor, C.A., Benozzo, A., Carey, N., Koro, M., & Elmenhorst, C. (2022). Knowledge production in material spaces: Disturbing conferences and composing events. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces (1967), Heterotopias.

Gourlay, L. (2015). Open education as a ‘heterotopia of desire’, Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 310–327.

Griffiths, J. (1999). Pip, pip: A sideways look at time. London: Flamingo.

Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington and

Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Handforth, R. & Taylor, C. A. (2016). Doing academic writing differently: A feminist

bricolage. Gender and Education. 28(5), 627–643.

Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the

Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Durham: Duke University Press.

Hickey-Moody, A. & Page, T. (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance. Rowman and Littlefield International.

Hill, S. (2008). The vows of silence. London: Vintage Books.

Hill Collins, P. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of

empowerment. New York: Routledge.

Hughes, C. (2013). I draw the line at stringing pearls. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(2), 153–167.

Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing qualitative research. London: Sage.

Koro-Ljungberg, M. and MacLure, M. (2013). Provocations, re-un-visions, death, and other possibilities of ‘Data.’ Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 219–222.

Koro-Ljungberg, M., Löytönen, T. & Tesar, M. (2017) (Eds.), Disrupting data in qualitative inquiry. Entanglements with the post-critical and post-anthropocentric. New York, Peter Lang.

Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.

Lather, P. and St. Pierre, E. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lester, S. and Russell, W. (2014). Turning the world upside down: Playing as the deliberate creation of uncertainty. Children, 1(2), 241–260.

MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.

Manning, E. & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Nordstrom, S. N. (2017). Antimethodology: postqualitative generative conventions. Qualitative Inquiry. Onlinefirst.

Osgood, J., Andersen, C. & Otterstad, A.M. (2022). Portal-time and wanderlines: What does virusing-with make possible in childhood research? Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology (RERM). Vol. 13(3).

Perry, M. (2011). ‘Article 3 devising in the rhizome: The ‘sensational’ body in drama.’ Education Research. Applied Theatre Researcher. Griffith University (Australia): pp. 1443-1726 [Online] [Accessed 26th August 2015]

Renold, EJ & Ivinson, G. (2021). Posthuman co-production: Bbecoming response-able with what matters. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(1), 108–128.

Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London: Routledge.

Sillitoe, P. (1975). Why string figures? Cambridge Anthropology, 3(1), 13–26.

Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthuman research practices for education. In C. A. Taylor and C. Hughes (Eds.) Posthuman Research Practices in Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 7–36.

Taylor, C. A. (2022) Feminisms and the posts: quiet activism as interconnection across difference. Paper in double symposium ‘Feminisms and the posts’. European Congress of Qualitative Inquiry. Online. 2nd February 2022.

Taylor, C. A. & Fairchild, N. (2020). Towards a posthumanist institutional ethnography: Viscous matterings and gendered bodies. Ethnography and Education. 15 (4): 509–527.

Taylor, C. A. & Gannon, S. (2018). Doing time and motion diffractively: Academic life everywhere and all the time. Qualitative Studies in Education. 31 (6): 465–486.

Ulmer, J. (2017). Writing slow ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3), 201–211.

Young I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




How to Cite

Taylor, C. A., Tobias-Green, K. ., Sexton, J., & Healey, J. (2022). Regarding String: A Theory-Method-Praxis of/for Co-compos(t)ing Feminist Hope. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 13(2).