A Response to Thought in Motion
Right in the middle: chaos. Or better put: chaoz. “A radically empirical, chaozmatic qualitative inquiry, then, is one that reckons with the quasi chaotic threshold of the middle—the middle of the method, the middle of the field, the middle of the muddle” (Bradley Robinson).
Metrics Loading ...
How to Cite
Manning, E. (2022). A Response to Thought in Motion. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5136
Copyright (c) 2022 Erin Manning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).