Backs and Fronts: Stitching Thread and Thought Through Manning, Methodology, and Art




This paper started with a messy embroidery back and a question: What happens when we play with/in mess, attending to how front/back, process/product, art/research, are counterparts in the event? To answer, we passed embroidery and writing techniques through each other, exploring what becomes possible when you think and make relationally, that is, between. Here, we stitch together Erin Manning’s theorization of the event with our experience. As we attuned ourselves to how thinking back-and-front together mattered, we found that our artful inquiry required us to rethink both what we thought and how we thought. Thus, we found that a methodology of front and back was made in this event, as a result of passing between. Finally, we invite readers to experiment with crafting their own methodologies of the between by flipping over their research as the embroidery hoop, and thereby opening the inquiry to its more-than.


Metrics Loading ...


Coogler, C. H. (2021). Lost in the becomings. In K. W. Guyotte & J. R. Wolgemuth (Eds.),

Philosophical mentoring in qualitative research: Collaborating and inquiring together.


Guyotte, K. W., Coogler, C. H., & Flint, M. A. (2022). I am with you: Artful (k)nottings

in/with qualitative pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. Advance Online

Publication 27 January 2022.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke

University Press.

Higgin, L. (1880). Handbook of embroidery. (Lady M. Alford, Ed.). Sampson Low, Marston,

Searle and Rivington. Retrieved from Project Gutenberg,

Hofverberg, H., & Kronlid, D. O. (2018). Human-material relationships in environmental and

sustainability education–an empirical study of a school embroidery project. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 955–968.

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed).

Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.

Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation's dance. Duke University Press.

Manning E. (2016a). Ten propositions for research-creation. In N. Colin and S. Sachsenmaier

(Eds.), Collaboration in performance practice (pp. 133–134). Palgrave Macmillan.

Manning, E. (2016b). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.

Manning, E. & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience.

University of Minnesota Press.

My Modern Met. (2019, February 17). Ultimate guide to embroidery: How it started and how

you can get started today.

Nordstrom, S. N. (2018). Antimethodology: Postqualitative generative conventions. Qualitative

Inquiry, 24(3), 215–226.

Smith, K. (2010). Mess: The manual of accidents and mistakes. Penguin Books.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the

new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3–9.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 603–

St. Pierre, E. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative

Inquiry, 20(6), 715–719.

Ulmer, J. B. (2018). Composing techniques: Choreographing a postqualitative writing

practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 728–736.




How to Cite

Coogler, C. H., & Guyotte, K. W. (2022). Backs and Fronts: Stitching Thread and Thought Through Manning, Methodology, and Art. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 13(3).

Cited by