Not-knowing-in-advance: Trying to think and see as if not doing a PhD.

Helen E. Bowstead

doi:10.7577/rerm.5141

Authors

Helen E. Bowstead https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-7490

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5141

Keywords:

research-creation, artfulness, thought-in-motion, neurotypical, exemplification

Abstract

In this piece, the writer offers up a tentative exemplification of how reframing a thesis in terms of what it can do rather than what it is has the potential to generate a joyful-artful engagement with the PhD process and to engender a more response-able relationship with the world. By refusing to engage in the dis-abling processes prescribed by institutional expectations of doctoral study, the act of writing emerges as a powerful antidote to the constraints of the neoliberal, neurotypical, university. Exploring a mode of expression that intertwines text and image, the writer enacts Erin Manning’s philosophical projects of research-creation, artfulness and thought-in-motion.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Bennett, J. (2011) Powers of the hoard: Artistry and agency in a world of vibrant matter [Video]. Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/29535247

Braidotti, R. (2013) Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1

Bridges-Rhoads, S. (2015) Writing paralysis in (post) qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(8), 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414566690

Bridges-Rhoads, S. (2018) Philosophical fieldnotes. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 646–660.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417733498

Cannon, S.O. (2020) Making kin with comprehensive exams: Producing scholar in intra-action. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419869962

Clough, P., & Issevenier, T. (2016). Worlding worlds with words in these times of data-fication. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 5(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2016.5.4.6

Guttorm, H. E. (2012) Becoming-(a)-paper, or an article undone: (Post-)knowing and writing (again), nomadic and so messy. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(7), 595–605.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412450157

Guttorm, H.E. (2016) Assemblages and swing-arounds: Becoming a dissertation, or putting

poststructural theories to work in research writing. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615618

Haraway, D.J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucen

Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q

Jackson, A.Y. (2017). Thinking without method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666–674.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355

MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277–286.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903462316

MacLure, M. (2013a). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,

(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755

MacLure, M. (2013b). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708613487863

Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.

Manning, E. (2008). Creative propositions for thought in motion, Inflexions, 1(1), 1–24. www.inflexions.org

Manning, E. (2009). What if it didn’t all begin and end with containment? Toward a

leaky sense of self. Body and Society, 15(3), 33–45.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09337785

Manning, E. (2014). Wondering the world directly – Or, how movement outruns the subject. Body and Society, 20(3&4), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14546357

Manning, E. (2015). ‘Artfulness’. In R. Grusin (Ed.), The Nonhuman Turn, 45– 79. University of Minnesota.

Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.

https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jhg1

Manning, E. (2019a). ‘FCJ-228 University, universitas’, Fibreculture Journal, 30, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.30.228.2019

Manning, E. (2019b). Toward a politics of immediation. Frontiers in Sociology, 3(42), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00042

Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679669.001.0001

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574

Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge: Polity.

Moten, F., & Harney, S. (2004). The University and the undercommons: Seven theses. Social

Text, 22(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-101

Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing as a method of inquiry. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). Sage.

Stewart, K. (2016). Worlding writing. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 5(4), 95–

https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2016.5.4.95

St. Pierre, E. A. (1995). Arts of existence: The construction of subjectivity in older, white southern women (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence.

Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1) 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418772634

St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1) 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005

Winterson, J. (2014). Sexing the cherry. Vintage Books.