Fielding Fractured Masculinities: Implications for Nonrepresentational Educational Research Methodology in the Philosophy of Erin Manning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5142Abstract
In this paper, I put Erin Manning’s philosophical project into conversation with gender theory and consider possibilities regarding what it means to theorize masculinities in educational research methodology. To do this, I first speak to the urgency for reconceptualizing masculinities in education, outline how educational researchers have previously theorized the field, and problematize previous work that theorized masculinity as a relatively stable and monolithic identity marker. Following this, I consider what Manning’s process philosophy might offer educational researchers in the field of masculinities. In thinking with masculinities, the ongoing and lived experiences of gender, and Manning, I offer “fractured masculinities,” which theorizes masculinities as multiple, mobile, relational, contextual, intersectional, and fractured.
Metrics
References
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” Routledge.
Butler, J. (2001). Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics, 31(4), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2004.0002
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
Connell, R. W. (1989). Cool guys, swots and wimps: The interplay of masculinity and education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498890150309
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
Connell R. W., (2007). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. In M. Kimmel and M. Messner (Eds.), Men’s Lives (7th Ed.) (610-625). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115250-2
Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2005). The minds of boys: Saving our sons from falling behind in school and life. Jossey-Boss.
Klindlon, D. J., Thompson, M., & Barker, T. (2000). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. Penguin Books.
Koro-Ljunberg, M. MacClure, M., & Ulmer, J. (2018). D…a…t…a…, data++, data, and some problematics. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (5th Ed.) (pp. 464-484). Sage.
Landreau, J., & Rodriguez, N. (Eds.). (2012) Queer masculinities: A critical reader in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2552-2
Mac an Ghaill, M., & Haywood, C. (2012). The queer in masculinity: Schooling, boys, and identity formation. In J. Landreau and N. Rodriguez (Eds.), Queer masculinities: A critical reader in education (pp. 69-84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2552-2_5
Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense movement, sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
Manning,, E. (2009) Relationscapes. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262134903.001.0001
Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smsmz
Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jhg1
McCready, L. T. (2010). Making space for diverse masculinities: Difference, intersectionality, and engagement in an urban high school. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0000-0
Reeser, T. W. (2010). Masculinities in theory: An introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317312
Sax, L. (2007). Boys adrift: The five factors driving the growing epidemic of unmotivated boys and underachieving young men. Basic Books.
Sweet, J. D. (2017). An autoethnography of masculinities: Flexibility and flexing in guyland. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(35).
Sweet, J. & Carlson D. L. (2018, April 13–17). Monocratic Masculinity as Hegemonic in the Age of Trump and its Implications for English Language Arts Instruction. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY.
Sweet, J. (2019a). (Re)considering diverse masculinities: Intersections amid art process and middle school boys fracturing masculinities. (13864512) [Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University] ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Sweet, J. (2019b). Deep friendship at a sausage party: A Foucauldian reading of friendship, fractured masculinities, and their potential for school practices. In D.L. Carlson & N. Rodriquez (Eds). Friendship as Ascesis: Foucault and Queer Studies in Education. (pp. 123–138). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31737-9_9
Tyre, P. (2008). The trouble with boys: A surprising report card on our sons, their problems at school, and what parents and educators must do. Three Rivers Press.
Verma, P., Kanno-Youngs, Z., Tavernise, S., Montague, Z., Waller, A., & Haberman, M. (2020) Highlights From the Transition: Trump, Refusing to Concede, Cheers On Supporters. The New York Times. Retrieved May 25 2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph D. Sweet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).