Disequilibrium, Disorder, Discord at a Video Game Design Camp: Welling the Chaos in Qualitative Inquiry
Whereas the colloquial notion of chaos as disorder, chance, and anarchy is laden with negative connotations in educational contexts—that is, chaos inhibits rather than promotes—the author attempts to rehabilitate chaos by drawing on a process philosophical view that emphasizes chaos’s generative potential. To develop this line of inquiry, the author offers a genealogical account of chaos across the work of Erin Manning before discussing its implications for qualitative inquiry in education. The text then picks up speed through an anarchival experiment with the Giga-Games Camp (pseudonym), a video game design camp for adolescents. Through this work, the author suggests that worlds cohere and are expressed through chaos, not in spite of it, and that qualitative researchers might therefore seek the virtue in chaos, especially in such chaotic times as our own.
Boldt, G. (2021). Theorizing vitality in the literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.307
Buchanan, I. (2017). Assemblage theory, or, the future of an illusion. Deleuze Studies, 11(3), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2017.0276
Bussanich, J. (1983). A theoretical interpretation of Hesiod's Chaos. Classical Philology, 78(3), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1086/366783
Daisley, B., Osbourne, O., & Rhoads, R. (1980). Crazy train [Song]. On Blizzard of Ozz. Jet.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Athlone. (Original work published 1980)
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published in 1991)
Ehret, C., Ehret, L., Low, B., & Čiklovan, L. (2019). Immediations and rhythms of speculative design: Implications for value in design‐based research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1603-1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12802
Ehret, C., Hollett, T., & Jocius, R. (2016). The matter of new media making: An intra-action analysis of adolescents making a digital book trailer. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(3), 346-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12802
Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
Hesiod. (2017). The poems of Hesiod: Theogony, works and days, and the shield of Herakles (B.B. Powell, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work composed c. 730-700 BCE) https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520966222
Iommi, A.F., Osbourne, O., Butler, T.M.J., Ward, W.T. (1971). Iron man [Song]. On Paranoid. Warner Bros. https://genius.com/Black-sabbath-iron-man-lyrics#song-info
James, W. (1996). Essays in radical empiricism. University of Nebraska Press.
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015). Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making
games for learning. Educational psychologist, 50(4), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022
Leander, K.M., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of Multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1): 22-46.
Manning, E. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense, movement, sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
Manning, E. (2008). Creative propositions for thought in motion. INFleXions, 1(1), 1–24. https://www.inflexions.org/n1_Creative-Propositions-for-Thought-in-Motion-by-Erin-Manning-1.pdf
Manning, E. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262134903.001.0001
Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smsmz
Manning, E. (2016a). Ten propositions for research-creation. In N. Colin & S. Sachsenmaier (Eds.), Collaboration in performance practice: Premises, workings and failures (pp. 133-141). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137462466_7
Manning, E. (2016b). The minor gesture. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jhg1
Manning, E. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478012597
Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679669.001.0001
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. John Wiley & Sons.
Ovid. (1993). The metamorphoses of Ovid. (A. Mandelbaum, Trans.). Harcourt Brace. (Original work published in 8 CE)
SenseLab-3e. (n.d.) SenseLab-3e. http://senselab.ca/wp2/
St. Pierre, E. A. (2017). Haecceity: Laying out a plane for post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 686-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727764
St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). The lure of the new and the hold of the dogmatic. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(5), 480-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420939133
Tanner, S. J., Leander, K. M., & Carter‐Stone, L. (2021). Ways with worlds: Bringing improvisational theater into play with reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.304
Tempest, J. (1986). The final countdown [Song]. On The final countdown. Epic.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Bradley Robinson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).