The Interview-Event-Agencement as Creative Movement and Methodological Disruption




In her article “Towards a Politics of Immediation,” Erin Manning (2019a) writes about the process of “immediation, the withness of time, of body in the making” (p. 1) that bodies subjectivity through the interstitial experience of/in the event. Drawing from Manning’s movement-oriented philosophy, and thinking-with her concepts of immediation, agencement, interval, and memory of the future, I invite alternate visualizations of interviewing as a research method through my study with international graduate students in a TESOL program at a Canadian university. By shifting focus from human-centred researcher intentionality and pre-determined research tools of the interviewing method, to the entangled human and non-human affective agencies of the interview-participant-voice-recorder-assemblage, I offer possibilities for experiencing the interview-event as an affective ecological attunement. Manning’s concepts also create interferences with existing institutional and TESOL representations and discourses, where multilingual students are often interpellated into rigid identity constructions and difference is seen as deficiency.


Metrics Loading ...


Bangou, F. (2014). On the complexity of digital video cameras in/as research: Perspectives and agreements. McGill Journal of Education, 49(3), 543 - 560.

Barlott, T., Shevallar, L., Turpin, M., & Setchell, J. (2020). The dissident interview: A deterritorializing guerilla encounter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 650 - 660.

Cannon, S.O. (2017). Teasing transcription: Iterations in the liminal space between voice and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(8), 1 - 13.

Cannon, S.O. (2020). A field guide to academic becoming. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8 - 9), 1110 - 1121.

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.

Ilieva, R., & Ravindran, A. (2018). Agency in the making: Experiences of international graduates of a TESOL program. System, 79, 7 - 18.

Koro Ljungberg, M., Löytönen, T., & Tesar, M. (2017). Disrupting data in qualitative inquiry: Entanglements with the post-critical and post-anthropocentric. Peter Lang.

Kuipers, H. (2019). How the minor moves us: Across thresholds, socialites, and techniques. A conversation with Erin Manning.

Lau, S.M.C., & Van Viegen, S. (Eds.). (2020). Plurilingual pedagogies: Creative endeavors for equitable language education. Springer.

MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 277 - 286.

MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228 - 232.

MacSwan, J. (2018). Academic English as a standard language ideology: A renewed research agenda for asset-based language education. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 1 – 9.

Manning, E. (2008). Creative propositions for thought in motion. Inflexions, 1.1.

Manning, E. (2009). Relationscapes: Movement, art, philosophy. The MIT Press.

Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Duke University Press.

Manning, E. (2014). Wondering the world directly – or, how movement outruns the subject. Body & Society, 3&4, 162 - 188.

Manning, E. (2016a). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.

Manning, E. (2016b). Ten propositions for research creation. In N. Colin & S. Sachsenmaier (Eds.), Collaborations in performance practice (pp. 133 - 139). Palgrave Macmillan.

Manning, E. (2019a). Towards a politics of immediation. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 1-11.

Manning, E. (2019b). Propositions for a radical pedagogy, or how to rethink value. In K.M. Leander & C. Ehret (Eds.), Affect in literacy teaching and learning (pp. 43 - 49). Routledge.

Manning, E. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press.

Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act. University of Minnesota Press.

Manning, E., Munster, A., & Thomsen, B.M.S. (2019a). Immediation I.

Manning, E., Munster, A., & Thomsen, B.M.S. (2019b). Immediation II.

Marn, T.M., & Wolgemuth, J.R. (2016). Purposeful entanglements: A new materialist analysis of transformative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(5), 365 - 374.

Marshall, S. (2020). Understanding plurilingualism and developing pedagogy: Teaching in linguistically diverse classes across the disciplines at a Canadian university. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 33(2), 142 - 156.

Marshall, S., & Moore, D. (2013). 2B or not 2B plurilingual? Navigating language literacies, and plurilingual competence in postsecondary education in Canada. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 472 - 499.

Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Polity Press.

Mazzei, L. (2013). A voice without organs: Interviewing in posthumanist research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 732 - 740.

Nordstrom, S.N. (2015). Not so innocent anymore: Making recording devices matter in qualitative interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(4), 388 - 401.

Nordstrom, S.N. (2018). Antimethodology: Postqualitative generative conventions. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 215 - 226.

Ravindran, A., & Ilieva, R. (2020). Affective affordances, desires, and assemblages. In F. Bangou, M. Waterhouse, & D. Fleming (Eds.), Deterritorializing language, teaching, learning and research: Deleuzo-Guattarian perspectives on second language education (pp. 110-132).

Scott, C., Safdar, S., Trilokekar, R.D., & El Masri, A. (2015). International students as ‘ideal immigrants' in Canada: A disconnect between policy makers' assumptions and the voices of international students. Comparative and International Education, 43(3), 1 - 6.

Shelton, S.A., & Flint, M.A. (2019). The spacetimemattering and Frankenstein-esque nature of

interview transcriptions. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 202 - 212.

Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge.

Springgay, S. (2015). ‘Approximate-rigorous abstractions’: Propositions of activation for posthumanist research in education. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 76 - 88). Routledge.

Springgay, S., & Truman, S.E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 203 - 214.

St. Pierre, E.A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111 - 124.

St. Pierre, E.A. (2018). Post-qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3 - 16.

Stille, S.V.V., Bethke, R., Bradley-Brown, J., Giberson, J., & Hall, G. (2016). Broadening educational practice to include translanguaging: An outcome of educator inquiry into multilingual students’ learning needs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(4), 480 - 503.

Taylor, C. (2018). Edu-crafting posthumanist adventures in/for higher education: A speculative musing. Parallax, 24(3), 371 - 381.

Van Viegen, S., & Zappa-Holman, S. (2020). Plurilingual pedagogies at the post-secondary level: Possibilities for intentional engagement with students’ diverse linguistic repertoires. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(2), 172 - 187.




How to Cite

Ravindran, A. (2022). The Interview-Event-Agencement as Creative Movement and Methodological Disruption. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 13(3).