A Cartographic Review of Teacher Educators’ Professional Learning with an Aesthetic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5577Keywords:
Cartographic review, post-qualitative inquiry, new materialism, aesthetic approach, teacher educators, collaborative professional learningAbstract
Experimenting with innovative and creative ways to conduct a literature review aligns with the paradigm shift from qualitative to post-qualitative research, which is concerned with doing and becoming rather than being. The aim of this article is twofold: to unfold the process of a cartographic approach to conducting a literature review; and by exploring the literature to discuss what an aesthetic approach activates in teacher educators’ collaborative professional learning activities. Inspired by Deleuze and Guattari (1988)’s cartographic principle of the rhizome, and post-qualitative inquiry more generally, this review generates knowledge through connections of concepts across 21 international research projects from teacher educators that use an aesthetic approach in their collaborative practices. New components of professional learning are found by mapping-and-tracing entangled concepts. A discussion of encounters within an aesthetic approach to professional learning shows how the processes involved in a cartographic review generates new directions in thinking, such as becoming-professional.
Metrics
References
Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
Austring, B. D. (2006). Æstetik og læring : grundbog om æstetiske læreprocesser. Reitzel.
Bankston, S. (2017). Deleuze and becoming. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474233583
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway : quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
Berbel-Gomez, N., Jaume, M., & Rovira, M. D. P. (2017). A cooperative learning experience through life stories linked with emotions: The ‘poliedric life stories’ experience [Article]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2017(October Special Issue INTE), 53-55.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Martyn-St James, M., & Booth, A. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (Third edition. ed.). SAGE.
Bowell, I. (2015). Beyond the gate: Community arts participation enhances teaching and learning [Article]. Curriculum Matters, 11, 31-51. https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0003
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Braidotti, R. (2019). A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. Theory, culture & society, 36(6), 31-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486
Chisholm, J. S., Jamner, J., & Whitmore, K. F. (2021). Amplifying Students' Musical Identities, Meanings, and Memories. English Journal, 110(4), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej202131127
Colebrook, C. (2017). What Is This Thing Called Education? Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725357
Czerniawski, G., Guberman, A., & MacPhail, A. (2017). The professional developmental needs of higher education-based teacher educators: an international comparative needs analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1246528
Davis, S. (2017). Drama and arts-based professional learning: exploring face-to-face, online and transmedia models [Article]. Teaching Education, 28(4), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2017.1296830
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus : capitalism and schizophrenia. Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. l. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia University Press.
Dengerink, J., Lunenberg, M., & Kools, Q. (2015). What and how teacher educators prefer to learn. Journal of education for teaching : JET, 41(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.992635
Dolphijn, R., & Tuin, I. v. d. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Open Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001
Duma, A. L., & Silverstein, L. B. (2008). Achieving a Greater Impact: Developing the Skills of Teaching Artists to Lead Professional Development for Teachers. Teaching Artist Journal, 6(2), 118-125.
Forsström, S., & Munthe, E. (2023). What Characterizes Nordic Research on Initial Teacher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. Nordic Studies in Education, 43(3), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v43.5588
Fowler, J. (2001). If the shoe fits, make it into art: Sole-mates in collaborative learning. Art Education, 54(5), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193931
Fox, N. J. (2023). Rhizomatic review: A materialist minor science approach to research evaluation. Qualitative research : QR. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941231216632
Garvis, S., Twigg, D., & Pendergast, D. (2011). Breaking the negative cycle: The formation of self-efficacy beliefs in the arts. A focus on professional experience in pre-service teacher education [Article]. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911103600206
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE.
Graham, M., & Hamlin, J. (2014). Teaching With Art21 and Contemporary Artists: Mark Bradford and the Use of Improvisation, Layering, and Text. Art Education, 67(4), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519283
Gruber, H. (2019). Lesson study with music: a new way to expand the dialogic space of learning and teaching [Article]. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(4), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2019-0019
Gunnarsson, K., & Bodén, L. (2021). Introduktion till postkvalitativ metodologi. Stockholm University Press. https://doi.org/10.16993/bbh
Harris, A. (2013). Peered and tiered learning: Action research as creative cultural pedagogy [Article]. Educational Action Research, 21(3), 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.815046
Harris, A., Snepvangers, K., & Thomson, P. (2018). Evolving Ecologies: Creative Policy, Partnerships and Practice in Education. In (pp. 1-9). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96725-7_1
Hart, P., & White, P. J. (2022). Special Issue: Postqualitative inquiry: Theory and practice in environmental education. Aust. J. environ. educ, 38(3-4), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.44
Hickey-Moody, A. (2016). Manifesto : the rhizomatics of practice as research. In A. Hickey-Moody & T. Page (Eds.), Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance : new materialisms (pp. 169-191). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Hoffmann, F., Allers, K., Rombey, T., Helbach, J., Hoffmann, A., Mathes, T., & Pieper, D. (2021). Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 138, 1-11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022
Jackson, A. Y. (2017). Thinking Without Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research - Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2023). Thinking with theory in qualitative research (Second edition. ed.). Routledge.
Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: self‐understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching, 15(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332
Kosnik, C., Menna, L., Dharamshi, P., Miyata, C., Cleovoulou, Y., & Beck, C. (2015). Four spheres of knowledge required: an international study of the professional development of literacy/English teacher educators. Journal of education for teaching : JET, 41(1), 52-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.992634
Kouvara, T. K., Karasoula, S. A., Karachristos, C. V., Stavropoulos, E. C., & Verykios, V. S. (2019). Technology and School Unit Improvement: Researching, Reconsidering and Reconstructing the School Context through a Multi-Thematic Digital Storytelling Project. SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020049
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2016). "The concept as method": Tracing-and-mapping the problem of the neuro(n) in the field of education. Cultural studies, critical methodologies, 16(2), 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634726
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2017). “This Is Not a Photograph of a Fetus”: A Feminist Reconfiguration of the Concept of Posthumanism as the Ultrasoundfetusimage. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732644
Levinsson, M., & Prøitz, T. S. (2017). The (Non-) Use of Configurative Reviews in Education. Educational Inquiry, 8(3), 209-231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1297004
Llull, J., Palacios, A., & Ulkuniemi, S. (2018). Fostering intercultural competence through art and ICT among university students in Spain and Finland. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (pp. 237-262). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5463-9.ch014
MacPhail, A., Ulvik, M., Guberman, A., Czerniawski, G., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., & Bain, Y. (2019). The professional development of higher education-based teacher educators: needs and realities. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 848-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1529610
Moate, J., Hulse, B., Jahnke, H., & Owens, A. (2019). Exploring the material mediation of dialogic space — A qualitative analysis of professional learning in initial teacher education based on reflective sketchbooks [Article]. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.003
Murphy, P. K., Knight, S. L., & Dowd, A. C. (2017). Familiar Paths and New Directions:Inaugural Call for Manuscripts. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317691764
Murris, K. (2021). Introduction: Making Kin. In K. Murris (Ed.), Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines : an introductory guide (pp. 1-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041177-0
Østern, T., Selander, S., & Østern, A.-L. (2019). Dybde//undervisning- sanselig designteoretiske og dramaturgiske perspektiver. In T. Østern (Ed.), Dybde//læring - en flerfaglig, relasjonell og skapende tilnærming. Universitetsforlaget.
Østern, T. P., Jusslin, S., Nødtvedt Knudsen, K., Maapalo, P., & Bjørkøy, I. (2023). A performative paradigm for post-qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 23(2), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211027444
Ping, C., Schellings, G., & Beijaard, D. (2018). Teacher educators' professional learning: A literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.003
Prøitz, T. S. (2023a). Methodiske tilnærminger til systematisk review. In T. S. Prøitz (Ed.), Forskningsoversikter i utdanningsvitenskap : systematikk og kreativitet (1. utgave. ed.). Fagbokforlaget.
Prøitz, T. S. (2023b). Systematisk review som inspirasjonskilde. In T. S. Prøitz (Ed.), Forskningsoversikter i utdanningsvitenskap : systematikk og kreativitet (1. utgave. ed., pp. 25-39). Fagbokforlaget.
Russell, T. (1997). Teaching teachers: How I teach is the message. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), In Teaching about teachers: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 32-47). Falmer Press.
Sauzet, S. (2021). What “what we know” does – a posthuman review methodology. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 12(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.4246
Spindler, F. (2013). Deleuze : tänkande och blivande. Glänta.
St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005
St. Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2016). New Empiricisms and New Materialisms: Conditions for New Inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616638694
Staikidis, K. (2009). Learning Outside the Box: How Mayan Pedagogy Informs a Community/University Partnership. Art Education, 62(1), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519000
Tack, H., Vanderlinde, R., Bain, Y., Kidd, W., O´Sullivan, M., & Walraven, A. (2021). Learning and design principles for teacher educators´ professional development. In R. Vanderlinde, K. Smith, J. Murray, & M. Lunenberg (Eds.), Teacher educators and their professional development. Learning from the past, looking to the future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037699-5
Taguchi, H. L., & St.Pierre, E. A. (2017). Using Concept as Method in Educational and Social Science Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 643-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417732634
Taylor, C. A. (2021). Knowledge matters: Five propositions concerning the reconceptualisation of knowledge in feminist new materialist, posthumanist and postqualitative approaches. In K. Murris (Ed.), Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist an critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines (pp. 22-42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041177-2
Tuin, I. v. d., Verhoeff, N., & Tuin, I. v. d. (2022). Critical concepts for the creative humanities. Rowman & Littlefield.
Uttley, L., Quintana, D. S., Montgomery, P., Carroll, C., Page, M. J., Falzon, L., Sutton, A., & Moher, D. (2023). The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 156, 30-41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011
Wade-Leeuwen, B. (2018). STEAM education: Creativity in teacher education programs. In Dimensions and Emerging Themes in Teaching Practicum: A Global Perspective (pp. 117-132). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351209885-9
Windsor, J. (2015). Desire lines: Deleuze and Guattari on molar lines, molecular lines, and lines of flight. New Zealand sociology, 30(1), 156-171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juliette Boks-Vlemmix, Jessica Aspfors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cited by
