Teachers’ Experiences and Role in the Design Process of Online Degree Programmes in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.4698Keywords:
Online degree programmes, Higher education, Teachers' experiences, Design-based researchAbstract
Background The study was conducted at a university of applied sciences in Finland. The viewpoint is of those online degree programme teachers involved in the initial steps of design and implementation of the first online degree programmes in the organisation that follows a pedagogical strategy in all its operations.
Objectives The teachers as implementers of the intended pedagogical solution have an important role in the design process. Their views were sought to gain information about their experiences of the intended design of online degree programmes in the local context.
Methods This study presents the results of the second cycle of a design-based research (DBR) process in the holistic design of online degree programmes. Focus group interview and thematic analysis were used to gain the teachers’ experiences of the holistic design to further develop the initial design created in the first cycle.
Findings The results reveal teachers’ positive and negative experiences of the holistic online degree programme design in three layers: organisational, pedagogical and online degree programme. Results include several new considerations, including management support, collegial support, collaboration and co-creation, online degree community, extended online and onsite teaching environments, blended education, and international aspects.
Conclusions The results indicate that it is important for higher education organisations to involve teachers in the design process of online degree programmes. The resulting design principles may be of interest to those managers, coordinators and educators developing higher education online degree programmes.
References
Alghamdi, A. & Li, L. (2013). Adapting Design-Based Research as a Research Methodology in Educational Settings. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10). https://www.ijern.com/journal/October-2013/27.pdf
The Rectors’ Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences ARENE (2018). Towards the World’s Best Higher Education System. The structural development working group report. https://www.arene.fi/julkaisut/raportit/rake-selvitys/
Badia, A., Garcia, C. & Meneses, J. (2019). Emotions in response to teaching online: Exploring the factors influencing teachers in a fully online university. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(4), 446- 457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1546608
Baran, E., Correia A-P. & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competences of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3) https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293
Benson, A. (2003). Dimensions of quality in online degree programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 145-159, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1703_2
Bower, M. (2018). A critical analysis of technology‐enhanced learning design frameworks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 981-997. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12668
Chie, A., Tai, J. & Dawson, P. (2018). A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 453-467, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913
Chipere, N. (2017). A framework for developing sustainable e-learning programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 32(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1270198
Cober, R. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
D’Antoni, S. (Ed.). (2006). The virtual university. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Damşa, C., Langford, M., Uehara, D. & Scherer, R. (2021). Teachers’ agency and online education in times of crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106793
Digivisio2030 (2021). Higher Education Institutes’ Digivision 2030. https://digivisio2030.fi/wp-content/uploads/Digivisio2030_09_2021_eng.pdf
Downing, J. (2017). Design principles for applied learning: bringing theory and practice together in an online VET teacher-education degree. International Journal of Training Research, 15(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2017.1313756
Edwards, R. & Holland, J. (2013). What is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472545244
Ghanem, S. (2020). E-learning in Higher Education to Achieve SDG 4: Benefits and Challenges. Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs (51154). https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeeconf51154.2020.9319981
Govers, E. (2014). An analysis of ethical considerations in programme design practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(6), 773-793. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.765942
Green, N. C., Edwards, H., Wolodko, B., Stewart, C., Brooks, M. & Littledyke, R. (2010). Reconceptualising higher education pedagogy in online learning. Distance Education, 31(3), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.513951
Honkimäki, S., Jääskelä, P., Kratochvil, J. & Tynjälä, P. (2021). University-wide, top-down curriculum reform at a Finnish university: perceptions of the academic staff. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1906727
Jefferies P., Carsten‐Stahl, B. & McRobb, S. (2007). Exploring the Relationships between Pedagogy, Ethics and Technology: Building a Framework for Strategy Development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390601168122
Joshi, M. (2021). Holistic design of online degree programmes in higher education – a case study from Finland. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2020-0588
Joshi, M. (2022). Sustainable development in the design of online degree programmes for national cross-studies. Ammattikasvatuksen Aikakauskirja, 23(4), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.54329/akakk.113318
Kali, Y. (2015). Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning. Instructional Science. 43(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9343-4
Kek, M. & Huijser, H. (2017). Problem-based Learning into the Future Imagining an Agile PBL Ecology for Learning. Springer: Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2454-2
Kellen, K. & Kumar, S. (2021). Types of barriers experienced by online instructors in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 23(4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter244/kellen_kumar244.html
Kettunen, J., Kairisto-Mertanen, L. and Penttilä, T. (2013). Innovation pedagogy and desired learning outcomes in higher education. On the Horizon, 21(4), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2011-0024
Kirschner, P. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
Konst, T. & Scheinin, M. (2018). The changing world has implications on the higher education and the teaching profession. On the Horizon, 26(1),1-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2017-0008
Konst, T. & Kairisto-Mertanen, L. (2020), Developing innovation pedagogy approach, On the Horizon, 28 (1), 45-54, https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-08-2019-0060
Kumar, S. (2014). Signature pedagogy, implementation and evaluation of an online program that impacts educational practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.11.001
Martin, F., Kumar, S. & She, L. (2021). Examining Higher Education Instructor Roles and Competencies in Online Teaching. Online Learning Journal, 25(4), 267-295. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i4.2570
Ministry of Education and Culture (2014). Universities of Applied Sciences Act. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2014/en20140932_20200000.pdf
Murtonen, M. & Vilppu, H. (2020). Change in University Pedagogical Culture – The Impact of Increased Pedagogical Training on First Teaching Experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.20
Murtonen, M., Laato, S., Hakanurmi, S., Salmento, H., & Lehtinen, E., (2020). Digital Technologies and Online Learning in Higher Education (Finland). In Bloomsbury Education and Childhood Studies. London: Bloomsbury. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350996502.0019
Naidu, S. (2019). Recalibrating Institutional Choreographies for a Future Focused Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(3). https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/369
Ng, M. L., Bridges, S., Po Law, S. & Whitehill, T. (2014) Designing, implementing and evaluating an online problem-based learning (PBL) environment – A pilot study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(1-2),117-13. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.807879
OECD (2021), The state of higher education: One year in to the COVID-19 pandemic. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/83c41957-en
Paniagua, A. & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing: Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085374-en
Penttilä, T. (2016). Developing educational organizations with innovation pedagogy. International e-journal of Advances in Education, 2(5), 259-267. http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org/download/article-file/225687
Peters, O. (2001). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London: Kogan Page.
Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., McKenney, S. & Zhu, C. (2019). Supporting teacher reflection during online professional development: a logic modelling approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1602077
Plomp, T. (2007). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: SLO.
Ragusa, A. T., & Crampton, A. (2017). Online learning: Cheap degrees or educational pluralization?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1208-1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12489
Reunanen T. & Taatila V. (2021). Felt Justice. Correlations Between University Students and University Personnel. In: Kantola J.I., Nazir S., Salminen V. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 267. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80876-1_21
Rovai, A. P. & Downey, J. R. (2010). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.001
Saldana, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press, inc.
Sener, J. (2015). Updated eLearning Definitions. Definitions of E-Learning Courses and Programs Version 2.0, April 4, 2015. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/updated-e-learning-definitions-2/
Shelton, K. (2011). A review of paradigms for evaluating the quality of online education programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(1). https://ojdla.com/archive/spring141/shelton141.pdf
Syvänen, A., Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Syrjä, S., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., & Viteli, J. (2016). When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar.Net, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2281
Tondeur, J. (2018). Enhancing future teachers’ competencies for technology integration in education: Turning theory into practice. Seminar.Net, 14(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2981
Tynjälä, P. (2017). Pedagogical Perspectives in Higher Education Research. In P. Teixeira, & J.Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, 1-6. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_170-1
Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Xiao, Junhong (2018). On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Education, 39(2), 259-274, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1429213
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marjo Joshi, Mauri Kantola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.