Black Screens

From problem to something useful?

Authors

  • Inge Hermanrud Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-4751
  • Gunhild Wedum Associate professor, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences.
  • Trine Løvold Syversen Assistant professor, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-6685
  • Sigrid Myklebø Associate professor, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-8077
  • Monica Johanessen Lervik Assistant professor, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2173-482X
  • Jens Petter Madsbu Associate professor, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
  • Åse Storhaug Hole Professor emirita, Inland School of Business and Social Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5494

Keywords:

Black screens, zoom, online education, adaptive structuration theory

Abstract

In this article, we ask the question: Why do students choose to turn their cameras off during online teaching? We discuss this issue from the perspective of adaptive structuration theory and media richness theory. We use qualitative data from 169 free text answers from two surveys conducted during the pandemic: in May/June 2020 and May/June 2021. In our analysis, we have developed three categories – “the social context”, “window mirror” and the “noisy classroom” – to better understand why students turn off their cameras. Based on these categories, we describe problems that turning off the camera is a response to. These problems are: too many cues, attributes of the home that might promote negative feelings, disclosure of home and personal activities, and online self-image. Our findings are in line with other research that contends that turning off the camera helps to reduce problems, such as an invasion of privacy that could be distracting and uncomfortable, and “digital fatigue”. We contribute to the research field by describing that some students turn off their camera for another reason: to maintain their self-image. However, although turning off cameras solves problems, the resulting “black screens” create new problems, in the form of less engagement for collaborative learning activities and an increased feeling of isolation among students.

References

Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS quarterly, 355-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/248682

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5(2), 121-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Christoforou, M. (2021). Language teaching through the ‘Black screen’: Implications of an emergency remote teaching context in higher education. In EDULEARN21 Proceedings (pp. 2603-2610). IATED. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0566

Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’ behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673

Gonzalez, R., Sørum, H., & Raaen, K. (2022). Emergency digital teaching during the COVID-19 lockdown: Students’ perspectives. Education Sciences, 12(3), 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030152

Hernwall, P., Käck, A., & Stymne, J. (2022). Norms, appropriation, and social affordances in studying in emergency remote teaching: A meta-analysis of student experiences. Högre utbildning, 12(3), 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/hu.v12.3830

Ishii, K., Lyons, M. M., & Carr, S. A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.138

Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 52(1), 96-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-b

Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17-48 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1148622

Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Eteokleous, N., & Stylianou-Georgiou, A. (2022). Emergency remote learning in higher education in Cyprus during COVID-19 lockdown: A Zoom-out view of challenges and opportunities for quality online learning. Education Sciences, 12(7), 477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070477

Meyerson, D., Weick, K. & Kramer, R. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In Kramer R. M. (Ed.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–196). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n9

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Managing use not technology: A view from the trenches. Mastering Information Management. Prentice-Hall.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.

Waluyo, B., & Wangdi, T. (2023). Reasons and impacts of camera on and off during synchronous online English teaching and learning: Insights from Thai EFL Context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 179-198.

Åkesson, E., Just, E., & Barajas, K. E. (2022). Closer and further away – Emergency-remote teacher education, orientations and student-bodies. Högre utbildning, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/hu.v12.3573

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

Hermanrud, I., Wedum, G., Løvold Syversen, T., Myklebø, S., Johanessen Lervik, M., Madsbu, J. P., & Storhaug Hole, Åse. (2023). Black Screens: From problem to something useful?. Seminar.net, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5494