Black Screens
From problem to something useful?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5494Emneord (Nøkkelord):
Black screens, zoom, online education, adaptive structuration theorySammendrag
In this article, we ask the question: Why do students choose to turn their cameras off during online teaching? We discuss this issue from the perspective of adaptive structuration theory and media richness theory. We use qualitative data from 169 free text answers from two surveys conducted during the pandemic: in May/June 2020 and May/June 2021. In our analysis, we have developed three categories – “the social context”, “window mirror” and the “noisy classroom” – to better understand why students turn off their cameras. Based on these categories, we describe problems that turning off the camera is a response to. These problems are: too many cues, attributes of the home that might promote negative feelings, disclosure of home and personal activities, and online self-image. Our findings are in line with other research that contends that turning off the camera helps to reduce problems, such as an invasion of privacy that could be distracting and uncomfortable, and “digital fatigue”. We contribute to the research field by describing that some students turn off their camera for another reason: to maintain their self-image. However, although turning off cameras solves problems, the resulting “black screens” create new problems, in the form of less engagement for collaborative learning activities and an increased feeling of isolation among students.
Referanser
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS quarterly, 355-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/248682
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5(2), 121-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Christoforou, M. (2021). Language teaching through the ‘Black screen’: Implications of an emergency remote teaching context in higher education. In EDULEARN21 Proceedings (pp. 2603-2610). IATED. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.0566
Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’ behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673
Gonzalez, R., Sørum, H., & Raaen, K. (2022). Emergency digital teaching during the COVID-19 lockdown: Students’ perspectives. Education Sciences, 12(3), 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030152
Hernwall, P., Käck, A., & Stymne, J. (2022). Norms, appropriation, and social affordances in studying in emergency remote teaching: A meta-analysis of student experiences. Högre utbildning, 12(3), 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/hu.v12.3830
Ishii, K., Lyons, M. M., & Carr, S. A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.138
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 52(1), 96-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-b
Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17-48 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1148622
Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Eteokleous, N., & Stylianou-Georgiou, A. (2022). Emergency remote learning in higher education in Cyprus during COVID-19 lockdown: A Zoom-out view of challenges and opportunities for quality online learning. Education Sciences, 12(7), 477. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070477
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. & Kramer, R. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In Kramer R. M. (Ed.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–196). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452243610.n9
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Managing use not technology: A view from the trenches. Mastering Information Management. Prentice-Hall.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
Waluyo, B., & Wangdi, T. (2023). Reasons and impacts of camera on and off during synchronous online English teaching and learning: Insights from Thai EFL Context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 179-198.
Åkesson, E., Just, E., & Barajas, K. E. (2022). Closer and further away – Emergency-remote teacher education, orientations and student-bodies. Högre utbildning, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/hu.v12.3573
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2023 Inge Hermanrud, Gunhild Wedum, Trine Løvold Syversen, Sigrid Myklebø, Monica Johanessen Lervik, Jens Petter Madsbu, Åse Storhaug Hole
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.