A part of the problem
An exploration of YouTube videos about depression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.5243Keywords:
Youtube, Depression, Young women, Text analysis, Vlogging, Health communication, Social mediaAbstract
In recent years, ordinary individuals with diverse health conditions have increasingly turned to social media platforms to share their experiences with illness. This trend has raised concerns regarding the informational value of these expressions, as well as the motivations behind them and their impact on viewers. This article is a critical examination of the textual characteristics and potential appeal of YouTube videos about depression uploaded by young Norwegian women who have personally experienced the disease. The discussion is grounded in a multimodal analysis of six videos. Utilizing Norman Fairclough’s concept of media discourse, the article explores three dimensions of these video blogs (vlogs): the representation of depression, their interaction with viewers and the identities of the vloggers. The analysis reveals that the vloggers do not disseminate misinformation about the symptoms of depression. Their statements align with clinical discourse. However, they remain vague about the disease’s underlying causes and do not reflect upon how social structures might influence their mental life. The relationship between the vloggers and their audience is characterized by intimacy and mutual support. Regarding their identities, the vloggers present themselves as nurturing women who aim to combat stigma and assist viewers in overcoming their mental challenges. However, their personas are not strictly maternal; rather, they exude a more glamorous appearance with makeup and long eyelashes. As potential role models for their audience, they inadvertently contribute to the societal pressure of maintaining a flawless image, a pressure that has intensified in the era of social media. Notably, research consistently indicates that young women often grapple with negative body image, which frequently intersects with depression. In other words, the depression vlogs are potentially part of the problem they try to solve.
References
Andreassen, H., Bujnowska-Fedak, M., Chronaki, C., Dumitru, R., Pudule, I., Santana, S., Voss, H., & Wynn, R. (2007). European citizens’ use of E-health services: A study of seven countries. BMC public health, 7, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-53
Andreassen, H. K., Wangberg, S. C., Wynn, R., Sørensen, T., & Hjortdahl, P. (2006). Helserelatert bruk av Internett i den norske befolkningen. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. https://tidsskriftet.no/2006/11/aktuelt/helserelatert-bruk-av-internett-i-den-norske-befolkningen
Cahiers du cinema. (2008). Johns Fords Young Mr. Lincoln. In Auteurs and authorship (ss. 212–227). Blackwell
Christ, B. (2019). The Glamorization of Depression. The Fordham Ram. https://thefordhamram.com/68100/culture/the-glamorization-of-depression/
Degenhard, J. (2021). Youtube users in the World 2025. Statista. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1144088/youtube-users-in-the-world
Eriksen, N. (2020, januar 23). Stress, press og psykiske plager blant unge. Ungdata. https://www.ungdata.no/stress-press-og-psykiske-plager-blant-unge/
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edvard Arnold.
Fergie, G., Hunt, K., & Hilton, S. (2013). What young people want from health-related online resources: A focus group study. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(5), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.744811
Gaus, Q., Jolliff, A., & Moreno, M. A. (2021). A content analysis of YouTube depression personal account videos and their comments. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100050
Harris, A. (2016). The Ethics of Researching Images Found Online. I Ethics and Visual Research Methods: Theory, Methodology, and Pratice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_5
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Ipsos. (2021). Ipsos SoMe-tracker Q1’21. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/nb-no/ipsos-some-tracker-q121
Jadayel, R., & Medlej, K. (2017). Mental Disorders: A Glamourous Attraction on Social Media? Journal of Teaching and Education, 7(01), 465–476.
Jhaveri, T. (2021). The Glamorization of Mental Illness in Social Media. Columbia Science Review. http://www.columbiasciencereview.com/1/post/2021/02/the-glamorization-of-mental-illness-in-social-media.html
Karlsen, R., Borrás Morell, J. E., & Traver Salcedo, V. (2017). Are Trustworthy Health Videos Reachable on YouTube? - A Study of YouTube Ranking of Diabetes Health Videos: Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006114000170025
Kurtin, K. S., O’Brien, N., Roy, D., & Dam, L. (2018). The Development of Parasocial Relationships on YouTube. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(1), 233–252.
Liu, L. S., Huh, J., Neogi, T., Inkpen, K., & Pratt, W. (2013). Health vlogger-viewer interaction in chronic illness management. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470663
Lorenz, T. (2018, oktober 12). YouTube Stars Are Being Accused of Profiting Off Fans’ Depression. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/10/youtube-stars-accused-of-profiting-off-depression-betterhelp-shane-dawson-phillip-defranco-elle-mills/572803/
Madathil, K. C., Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J., Greenstein, J. S., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2015). Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal, 21(3), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
Mohsin, M. (2021, january 25). 10 Youtube Statistics That You Need to Know in 2021. https://www.oberlo.com/blog/youtube-statistics
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A. (2020). Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 5(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x
Naslund, J. A., Grande, S. W., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Elwyn, G. (2014). Naturally Occurring Peer Support through Social Media: The Experiences of Individuals with Severe Mental Illness Using YouTube. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110171
Norsk helseinformatikk AS. (2021). Depresjon, en oversikt. NHI.no. https://nhi.no/sykdommer/psykisk-helse/depresjon/depresjon-en-oversikt/
Sangeorzan, I., Andriopoulou, P., & Livanou, M. (2019). Exploring the experiences of people vlogging about severe mental illness on YouTube: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.119
Strangelove, M. (2010). Watching YouTube: Extraordinary Videos by Ordinary People. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442687035
Svennevig, J., Sandvik, M., & Vagle, W. (1995). Tilnærminger til tekst: Modeller for språklig tekstanalyse. I Norbok. Landslaget for norskundervisning. https://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-nb_digibok_2008022900031
Teach Me. (2023). How to Monetize Your Youtube Channel. Teach Me. https://www.epidemicsound.com/blog/how-to-monetize-your-channel/
Waitzkin, H. (1989). A Critical theory of Medical Discourse: Ideology, social Control, and the Processing of Social Context in Medical Encounters. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30 (June), 220–239.
Watts, N. (2015). The Beauty Myth (Vintage Feminism Short Edition). ARK. https://www.ark.no/produkt/boker/dokumentar-og-faktaboker/the-beauty-myth-vintage-feminism-short-edition-9781784870416
YouTube Creator Academy. (2021). YouTube’s Community Guidelines—YouTube. https://creatoracademy.youtube.com/page/course/community-guidelines?hl=en&hl=en
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eva Bakøy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Seminar.net is a fully open access journal, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. The journal allow reuse and remixing of content in accordance with a Creative Commons license CC-BY
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Seminar.net does not charge authors for publishing with us.