Student- and system-level assessment in Nordic countries and in Estonia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6549Keywords:
compulsory education, system-level assessment, student assessment, Nordic countriesAbstract
Although the Nordic countries and Estonia share many similarities in their basic education system, student assessment and evaluation of educational systems in these countries are implemented in many ways. Even though international assessments such as the OECD's PISA and their results have influenced the development of the educational systems of these countries, in this review article, we analyze and compare how national student-level assessments and system-level evaluations are implemented in the Nordic countries and Estonia. This study is based on a critical analysis of 40 documents. The document analysis has been used in an abductive-driven manner. Our results show that, in both student- and system‑level assessments, there are significant differences among all the Nordic countries and Estonia in terms of how many assessments are conducted, in which grades they take place during compulsory education, and for what purposes the results are used. The results show how system-and student-level assessments are implemented differently in the Nordic countries and in Estonia. However, our results also show that mother tongue and mathematics are almost invariably assessed at the system- and student-level. The research themes and results discussed in this paper are essentially related to the special issue of this journal from the perspective of how learning outcomes and students’ performance are assessed.
Downloads
References
Adolfsson, C. H. (2024). The local governance of Swedish schools in light of a new educational policy landscape empirical exploration and theoretical elaboration. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 10(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2024.2348298
Ahonen, S. (2003). Yhteinen koulu. Tasa-arvoa vai tasapäisyyttä? [A common school: Equality or uniformity?]. Vastapaino.
Bauer, T., Zviagintsev, R., & Kampa, N. (2026). Credibility of intersectionality frameworks in question: evidence from a large-scale study in Austria.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 41, 63.
Beuchert, L. V., & Nandrup, A. B. (2018). The Danish national tests at a glance. Nationaløkonomisk tidsskrift, 2018(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2996431
Breakspear, S. (2014). How does PISA shape education policy making? Why how we measure learning determines what counts in education (Seminar Series Paper No. 240). Centre for Strategic Education. https://simonbreakspear.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Breakspear-PISA-Paper.pdf
Buli-Holmberg, J., Sigstad, H. M. H., Morken, I., & Hjörne, E. (2022). From the idea of inclusion into practice in the Nordic countries: a qualitative literature review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2031095
Chelimsky, E. (1997). Thoughts for a new evaluation society. Evaluation, 3(1), 97-109.
Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209922
Corral-Granados, A., Rapp, A. C., & Smeplass, E. (2023). Nordic challenges related to exclusion and local responses in Swedish, Finnish, and Norwegian urban compulsory education. Education Inquiry, 16(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2163002
Eisenschmidt, E., Heidmets, M., Kitsing, M., Kasesalk, M., & Vanari, K. (2023). Aim high and work hard: Building a world-class learning system in Estonia. National Center on Education and the Economy.
Finnish Education Evaluation Center. (2024). National education evaluation plan 2024–2027. https://www.karvi.fi/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/documents/National%20Education%20Plan%202024-2027.pdf
Hovdhaugen, E., Flobakk-Sitter, F. & Fossum, L.W. (2025). Nordic research on organisation and implementation of exams and final assessments – a systematic scoping review. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 37, 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-025-09469-6
Hudson, C. (2011). Evaluation – the (not so) softly approach to governance and its consequences for compulsory education in the Nordic countries. Education Inquiry, 2(4), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v2i4.22006
Huhta, A. (2010). Innovations in diagnostic assessment and feedback: An analysis of the usefulness of the DIALANG language assessment system [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Jyväskylä. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-86-0718-2
Husén, T. (1972). Social background and educational career: Research perspectives on equality of educational opportunity. OECD/CERI.
Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2013). Oppimistulosten arviointijärjestelmistä ja niiden kehittämishaasteista [Learning-outcome assessment systems and their development challenges]. In A. Räisänen (Ed.), Oppimisen arvioinnin kontekstit ja käytännöt (pp. 13–36). Opetushallitus. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/Oppimisen%20arvioinnin%20kontekstit%20ja%20k%C3%A4yt%C3%A4nn%C3%B6t%202.pdf
Jakku-Sihvonen, R. & Kuusela, J. (2002). Mahdollisuuksien koulutuspolitiikan tasa-arvo [Equity in an education policy of opportunities] (Arviointi 7/2002). Opetushallitus.
Kauko, J., Pitkänen, H., & Varjo, J. (2022). Quality in Finnish comprehensive schools: Entrenching enhancement-led evaluation. In C. de la Porte, G. B. Eydal, J. Kauko, D. Nohrstedt, P. Hart, & B. S. Tranøy (Eds.), Successful public policy in the Nordic countries: Cases, lessons, challenges (pp. 432–455). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856296.003.0021
Kilpi, N., Ouakrim-Soivio, N., Minkkinen, L., & Söyrinki, S. (2025). Oppimistuloskehitys ja koulutuspoliittiset toimet Pohjoismaissa ja Virossa 2010-luvulta 2020-luvun alkuun [Trends in learning outcomes and education policy measures in the Nordic countries and Estonia from the 2010s to the early 2020s] (Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos, Raportteja ja työpapereita 13). Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos. https://doi.org/10.17011/ktl-rt/13
Klapp, A. (2015). Does grading affect educational attainment? A longitudinal study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.988121
Klapp Lekholm, A. (2011). Effects of school characteristics on grades in compulsory school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(6), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.555923
Klapp Lekholm, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2009). Effects of student characteristics on grades in compulsory school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802470425
Korkeakoski, E. (2005). Perusopetuksen oppimistulokset ohjausjärjestelmän osaksi [Integrating learning outcomes in compulsory education into the steering system]. In H. K. Lyytinen & A. Räisänen (Eds.), Kehittämissuuntaa arvioinnista (pp. 175–192). Koulutuksen arviointineuvosto. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-3242-8
Krejsler, J. B., & Moos, L. (Eds.) (2023). School policy reform in Europe. Exploring Transnational Alignments, National Particularities and Contestations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35434-2
Kuusela, J., & Hautamäki, J. (2005). Mitataan oppilaita, mutta päätellään koulusta [Pupils are assessed, but conclusions are drawn about schools]. In H. K. Lyytinen & A. Räisänen (Eds.), Kehittämissuuntaa arvioinnista (pp. 229–241). Koulutuksen arviointineuvosto. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-3242-8
Lag om ändring i skollagen. (2025). Lag om ändring i skollagen (2010:800) (SFS 2025:729) [Act amending the Education Act (2010:800)]. Svensk författningssamling. https://svenskforfattningssamling.se/sites/default/files/sfs/2025-06/SFS2025-729.pdf
Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (2006). Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.) (LOV nr. 313 af 19/04/2006) [Act amending the Folkeskole Act (strengthened evaluation and use of national tests as a pedagogical tool and compulsory examinations, etc.)]. Retsinformation. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2006/313
Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2016). Betygssystem i internationell belysning [Grading systems in an international perspective]. Skolverket. https://www.skolverket.se/sok-publikationer/publikationsserier/ovrigt-material/2017/betygssystem-i-internationell-belysning
Lundahl, C., Hultén, M., & Tveit, S. (2017). The power of teacher-assigned grades in outcome-based education. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1317229
Lynch, K., & Baker, J. (2005). Equality in education: An equality of condition perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 3(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878505053298
Lysne, A. (2006). Assessment theory and practice of students' outcomes in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743365
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2010). The hatred of public schooling: School as the mark of democracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5–6), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00692.x
Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002013
Mills, B. (2021). Education research and evaluation in leading education nations. How nations organize, focus and fund their research and policy making. Education Policy Institute.
Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory – 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X004010007
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en.
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/01820d6d-en
Oja, M. (2024). External evaluation as an influencer of history teaching: Analyzing the final exam in Estonia’s basic schools. In J. Wojdon, E. van Eeden, A. John, M. Oja, A. Palikidis, R. Weintraub, & B. Vajda (Eds.), International Journal of History Education & Culture: Yearbook of the International Society for History Didactics (Vol. 45, pp. 111–138). Wochenschau Verlag. https://jhec.wochenschau-verlag.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2025/05/issue_2024.pdf
Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge University Press.
Opetushallitus. (2026). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2014 [National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014]. https://eperusteet.opintopolku.fi/#/fi/perusopetus/419550/tiedot
Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2013). Toimivatko päättöarvioinnin kriteerit? Oppilaiden saamat arvosanat ja Opetushallituksen oppimistulosten seuranta-arviointi koulujen välisten osaamiserojen mittareina [Do the final assessment criteria work? Grades awarded to pupils and the Finnish National Board of Education’s follow-up assessment of learning outcomes as measures of differences in competence between schools] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Helda. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/41026
Ouakrim-Soivio, N. (2024). Assessment of and for learning. Otava.
Ouakrim-Soivio, N., Rautopuro, J., & Hildén, R. (2018). Shadows under the North Star: The inequality developing in Finnish school education. Nordidactica. Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 8(3), 65–86. https://journals.lub.lu.se/nordidactica/article/view/19073
Pelletier, C. (2009). Emancipation, equality and education: Rancière's critique of Bourdieu and the question of performativity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300902809054
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39–83). Rand McNally.
Seppänen, P., Kosunen, S., & Rinne, R. (2018). Lohkoutuuko koulutuspolku, katoaako tasa-arvo? In R. Rinne, N. Haltia, S. Lempinen, & T. Kaunisto (Eds.), Eriarvoistuva maailma – tasa-arvoistava koulu? (pp. 65–91). Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-5401-84-4
Simon, M., Ercikan, K., & Rousseau, M. (2012). Introduction. In M. Simon, K. Ercikan, & M. Rousseau (Eds.), Improving large-scale assessment in education: Theories, issues and practice (pp. 1–8). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154519
Skolverket. (2015a). Skolreformer i praktiken: Hur reformerna landade i grundskolans vardag 2011–2014 [School reforms in practice: How the reforms were realised in everyday compulsory school practice 2011–2014] (Rapport 418). https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3553
Skolverket. (2015b). Resultat på nationella prov i årskurs 3, 6 och 9, läsåret 2014/15 [Results of national tests in grades 3, 6, and 9 in the 2014/15 academic year]. https://www.skolverket.se/download/18.6bfaca41169863e6a65bbf7/1553966415233/pdf3556.pdf
Skolverket. (2020). Likvärdiga betyg och meritvärden: Ett kunskapsunderlag om modeller för att främja betygens och meritvärdenas likvärdighet [Equivalent grades and merit values: A knowledge base on models for promoting the equivalence of grades and merit values] (Rapport 2020:7). https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=7582
Tannenbaum, R. J., & Kane, M. T. (2019). Stakes in testing: Not a simple dichotomy but a profile of consequences that guides needed evidence of measurement quality. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12255
Taras, M. (2009). Summative assessment: the missing link for formative assessment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802638671
Telhaug, A. O., Asbjørn Mediås, O., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic Model in Education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743274
Tire, G., & Värä, E. (2022). Cross-national achievement surveys and educational monitoring in Estonia. In L. Volante, S. V. Schnepf, & D. A. Klinger (Eds.), Cross-National Achievement Surveys for Monitoring Educational Outcomes: Policies, Practices and Political Reforms within the European Union (pp. 192–207). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/406165
Ukkola, A., Suomilammi, M., Silverström, C., Metsämuuronen, J., & Marjanen, J. (2025). Matematiikan ja äidinkielen taidot kuudennen luokan lopussa – Perusopetuksen oppimistulosten pitkittäisarviointi 2018–2024 [Competence in mathematics and mother tongue and literature at the end of sixth grade – A longitudinal assessment of learning outcomes in basic education 2018–2024] (Julkaisut 1:2025). Kansallinen koulutuksen arviointikeskus. https://www.karvi.fi/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/documents/KARVI_0125.pdf
van Hulst, M., & Visser, E. L. (2025). Abductive analysis in qualitative research. Public Administration Review, 85(2), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13856
van Maanen, J., Sørensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). Introduction to special topic forum: The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586080
Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1522045
Volmari, K. (Ed.). (2019). Basic education in the Nordic region: Similar values, different policies. Finnish National Agency for Education.
von Davier, M., Kennedy, A. M., Reynolds, K. A., Gonzalez, E., & Khorramdel, L. (2025). TIMSS 2023 Longitudinal International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.dn2487
Wallenius, T. (2020). Schools, performance and publicity: Contrasting the policy on publicising school performance indicators in Finland with the other Nordic countries [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Helda. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/318298
Wallenius, T., Juvonen, S., Hansen, P., & Varjo, J. (2018). Schools, accountability and transparency – Approaching the Nordic school evaluation practices through discursive institutionalism. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1537432
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. SAGE Publications.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Najat Ouakrim-Soivio, Nestori Kilpi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaration on copyright
- The author/s will keep their copyright and right of reproduction of their own manuscript, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, but give the journal a permanent right to 1) present the manuscript to the public in the original form in which it was digitally published and 2) to be registered and cited as the first publication of the manuscript.
- The author itself must manage its financial reproduction rights in relation to any third-parties.
- The journal does not provide any financial or other remuneration for contributions submitted.
- Readers of the journal may print the manuscripts presented under the same conditions that apply to reproduction of a physical copy. This means that mass reproduction of physical copies or production of copies for commercial purposes is not permitted without the agreement of the author/s.
